Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:54:34.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glyphosate-Resistant Italian Ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) Control with Fall-Applied Residual Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason A. Bond*
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
Thomas W. Eubank
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
Robin C. Bond
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
Bobby R. Golden
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
H. Matthew Edwards
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Dense populations of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Italian ryegrass are problematic for spring burndown herbicide programs and crop establishment in the midsouthern United States. Two field studies were conducted to evaluate fall-applied residual herbicides for control of GR Italian ryegrass and to identify the most effective application timing for these herbicides. Fall applications of clomazone at 0.84 and 1.12 kg ai ha−1, pyroxasulfone at 0.16 kg ai ha−1, and S-metolachlor at 1.79 kg ai ha−1 controlled GR Italian ryegrass ≥ 93% 180 d after application. Control from incorporated applications of pendimethalin at 1.59 kg ai ha−1 and trifluralin at 1.68 kg ai ha−1 and surface applications of S-metolachlor at 1.42 kg ha−1 provided control similar to the best treatments. Glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass control following clomazone, pyroxasulfone, S-metolachlor, or trifluralin applied in mid September, October, or November exceeded that from fall tillage by 19 to 56% at 90 and 140 d after the last treatment. Pyroxasulfone and S-metolachlor controlled more GR Italian ryegrass following October or November applications compared with those in September at both 90 and 140 d after the last application timing. However, the benefit of delaying clomazone application from October to November was not realized until the last evaluation (140 d after the last treatment). Clomazone, pyroxasulfone, and S-metolachlor offer growers the best opportunity for residual control of GR Italian ryegrass, and control is optimized when these herbicides are applied in November.

Poblaciones densas de Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum resistente a glyphosate (GR) son problemáticas para los programas de eliminación de vegetación en la primavera y para el establecimiento de cultivos en el centro-sur de los Estados Unidos. Se realizaron dos estudios de campo para evaluar aplicaciones de herbicidas residuales en el otoño para el control de L. perenne GR y para identificar el momento de aplicación más efectivo para estos herbicidas. Aplicaciones en el otoño de clomazone a 0.84 y 1.12 kg ai ha−1, pyroxasulfone a 0.16 kg ai ha−1, y S-metolachlor a 1.79 kg ai ha−1 controlaron L. perenne GR ≥93%, 180 d después de la aplicación. El control a partir de aplicaciones incorporadas de pendimethalin a 1.59 kg ai ha−1 y trifluralin a 1.68 kg ai ha−1 y aplicaciones superficiales de S-metolachlor a 1.42 kg ha−1 brindaron un control similar a los mejores tratamientos. El control de L. perenne GR después de aplicaciones de clomazone, pyroxasulfone, S-metolachlor, o trifluralin, en la mitad de Septiembre, Octubre, o Noviembre, excedieron el control obtenido con labranza en el otoño en 19 a 56%, a 90 a 140 d después del tratamiento. Pyroxasulfone y S- metolachlor aplicados en Octubre o Noviembre controlaron L. perenne GR más que las aplicaciones en Septiembre a 90 y 140 d después del último momento de aplicación. Sin embargo, el beneficio de retrasar la aplicación de clomazone de Octubre a Noviembre no se vio sino hasta la última evaluación (140 d después del tratamiento). Clomazone, pyroxasulfone, y S-metolachlor ofrecen a los productores la mejor oportunidad de control residual de L. perenne GR, y el control se optimiza cuando estos herbicidas se aplican en Noviembre.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Appleby, AP, Brewster, BD (1992) Seeding arrangement on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield and interaction with Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Technol 6:820823 Google Scholar
Appleby, AP, Olson, PD, Colbert, DR (1976) Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron J 68:463466 Google Scholar
Barnes, MA, Peeper, TF, Epplin, FM, Krenzer, EG Jr. (2001) Effects of herbicides on Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), forage production and ecomonmic returns from dual-purpose winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 15:264270 Google Scholar
Bell, CE (1995) Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) yield loss from Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne) interference. Weed Sci 43:117120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165169 Google Scholar
Bond, JA, Eubank, TW, Nandula, VK, Bond, RC (2011) Managing glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass in the midsouth. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 64:225 Google Scholar
Bond, JA, Stephenson, DO IV, Barnes, JB, Bararpour, MT, Oliver, LR (2005) Diclofop-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in imidazolinone-tolerant wheat. Weed Technol 19:437442 Google Scholar
Bond, RC, Bond, JA, Eubank, TW, Nandula, VK. 2011. Clethodim-based programs for managing glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 64:17 Google Scholar
Broster, JC, Pratley, J (2006) A decade of monitoring herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum in Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 46:11511160 Google Scholar
Carey, JH (1995) Lolium multiflorum. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis. Accessed August 19, 2013Google Scholar
Carpenter, J, Gianessi, L (1999) Herbicide tolerant soybeans: why growers are adopting Roundup Ready varieties. AgBio Forum 2:6572 Google Scholar
Cerdeira, A L, Duke, SO (2006) The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: a review. J Environ Qual 35:16331658 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauhan, BS, Gill, GS, Preston, C (2007) Effect of seeding systems and dinitroaniline herbicides on emergence and control of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in wheat. Weed Technol 21:5358 Google Scholar
Christoffoleti, PJ, Trentin, R, Tocchetto, S, Marochi, A, Galli, AJB, Lopez-Ovejero, RF, Nicolai, M (2005) Alternative herbicides to manage Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam) resistant to glyphosate at different phenological stages. J Environ Sci Health 40:5967 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clemmer, KC, York, AC, Brownie, C (2004) Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in imidazolinone-resistant wheat. Weed Technol 18:481489 Google Scholar
Crooks, HL, York, AC, Jordan, DL (2003) Wheat (Triticum aestivum) tolerance and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control by AE F130060 plus AE F115008 mixed with other herbicides. Weed Technol 17:881889 Google Scholar
Davies, W (1928) The factor of competition between one species and another in seeds mixtures. Pages 82149 in Stapledon, RG, Davies, W, eds. Seeds Mixture Problems: Competition. Bull Welsh Pl Breed Stn Ser H 8:1–162Google Scholar
Eubank, TW, Bond, JA, Nandula, VK, Bond, RC (2011) Addition of photosystem II inhibitors to paraquat improves control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum). Proc South Weed Sci Soc 64:28 Google Scholar
Geier, PW, Stahlman, PW, Frihauf, JC (2006) KIH-485 efficacy comparisons in conventional and no-tillage corn. Weed Technol 20:622626 Google Scholar
Grey, TL, Bridges, DC (2003) Alternatives to diclofop for the control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 17:219223 Google Scholar
Hafenrichter, AL, Schwendiman, JL, Harris, HL (1968) Grasses and legumes for soil conservation in the Pacific Northwest and Great Basin states. Page 69 in Agriculture Handbook 339. Washington, DC: United States Departments of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Google Scholar
Hall, MH (1992) Ryegrass Agronomy Facts 19. State College, PA: The Pennsylvania State College of Agricultural Sciences Cooperative Extension Google Scholar
Hannaway, D, Fransen, S, Cropper, J, Teel, M, Chaney, M, Griggs, T, Halse, R, Hart, J, Cheeke, P, Hansen, D, Klinger, R, Lane, W (1999) Annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/html/pnw/pnw501/. Accessed August 19, 2013Google Scholar
Hashem, A, Radosevich, SR, Roush, ML (1998) Effect of proximity factor on competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci 46:181190 Google Scholar
Hasty, RF, Sprague, CL, Hager, AG (2004) Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Weed Technol 18:887892 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2013) Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/. Accessed August 19, 2013Google Scholar
Hulting, AG, Dauer, JT, Hinds-Cook, B, Curtis, D, Koepke-Hill, RM, Mallory-Smith, C (2012) Management of Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) in western Oregon with preemergence applications of pyroxasulfone in winter wheat. Weed Technol 26:230235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justice, GG, Peeper, TF, Solie, JB, Epplin, FM (1994) Net returns from Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 8:317323 Google Scholar
McAllister, FM, Holtum, JAM, Powles, SB (1995) Dinitroaniline herbicide resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Weed Sci 43:5562 Google Scholar
[MSU-AE] Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics (2012) 2013 Cotton Planning Budgets. Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics, December 2012. Budget Report 2012-03 Google Scholar
[MSU-ES] Mississippi State University Extension Service (2013) Herbicide-resistant weeds. Pages 928 in Byrd, JD Jr., ed. 2013. Weed Control Guidelines for Mississippi. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Extension Service and Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experimental Station Google Scholar
Mueller, TC, Steckel, LE (2011) Efficacy and dissipation of pyroxasulfone and three chloroacetamides in a Tennessee field soil. Weed Sci 59:574579 Google Scholar
Nandula, VK, Poston, DH, Eubank, TW, Koger, CH, Reddy, KN (2007) Differential response to glyphosate in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) populations from Mississippi. Weed Technol 21:477482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, M, Walsh, MJ, Llewellyn, R, Powles, SB (2007) Widespread occurrence of multiple herbicide resistance in western Australian annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) populations. Aust J Agric Res 58:711718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, A, Kogan, M (2003) Glyphosate-resistant Lolium multiflorum in Chilean orchards. Weed Res 43:1219 Google Scholar
Perez-Jones, A, Park, K, Colquhoun, J, Mallory-Smith, C, Shaner, D (2005) Identification of glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in Oregon. Weed Sci 53:775779 Google Scholar
Rauch, TA, Thill, DC, Gersdorf, SA, Price, WJ (2010) Widespread occurrence of herbicide-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in northern Idaho and eastern Washington. Weed Technol 24:281288 Google Scholar
Ritter, RL, Menbere, H (2002) Control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 16:5559 Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2008) The SAS system for Windows. Release 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Saxton, AM (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. Pages 12431246 in Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary, NC SAS Institute Google Scholar
Service, RF (2007) Glyphosate—the conservationist's friend? Science 316:11161117 Google Scholar
Stanger, CE, Appleby, E, Arnold, P (1989) Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci 37:350352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, GL, Porpiglia, PJ, Chandler, JM (2005) Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) and selected broadleaf weeds in corn. Weed Technol 19:866869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stougaard, RN, Kapusta, G, Roskamp, G (1984) Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci 32:293298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardiff, FJ, Powles, SB (1999) Effect of malathion on resistance to soil-applied herbicides in a population of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Weed Sci 47:258261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, JM, Coats, GE (1996) Identification of sulfometuron-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) selections. Weed Technol 10:943946 Google Scholar
Tharp, BE, Kells, JJ (2000) Effect of soil-applied herbicides on establishment of cover crop species. Weed Technol 14:596601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (2013) Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum (Lam.) Husnot. http://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=LOPEM2. Accessed August 19, 2013Google Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Fowler, TM, Crowe, B, Ambe, T, Powles, SB (2011) The potential for pyroxasulfone to selectively control resistant and susceptible rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) biotypes in Australian grain crop production systems. Weed Technol 25:3037 Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2012) Weed survey—grass crops subsection. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 65:267288 Google Scholar
Wilken, DH (1993). Lolium . Page 1400 in Hickman, JC, ed. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Google Scholar
Young, BG (2006) Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 20:301307 Google Scholar