Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:37:45.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate Spray Drift Management with Drift-Reducing Nozzles and Adjuvants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Adam K. Johnson ,
Fred W. Roeth ,
Alex R. Martin  and
Robert N. Klein
Adam K. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, P.O. Box 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Fred W. Roeth
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, P.O. Box 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Alex R. Martin*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, P.O. Box 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Robert N. Klein
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, P.O. Box 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of five spray-nozzle types and three drift-control adjuvants (DCA) on glyphosate spray drift. The extended-range (XR) flat-fan nozzle at 280 kPa was used as the standard comparison. DCAs were evaluated for drift reduction with the use of the XR and air-induction (AI) nozzles. Wind speed ranged from 1.3 to 9.4 m/s (3 to 21 mph). Lethal drift (DL) and injury drift (DI) were determined by downwind visual observation of grain sorghum response. Drift distances were measured from the spray swath edge. The Turbo FloodJet and AI nozzles reduced DL distance by 34%. All four drift-reducing (DR) nozzles reduced DI distance by 22 to 32%. Reducing the pressure of the XR flat-fan nozzle from 280 to 140 kPa did not reduce DL or DI distance. When applied through AI nozzles, each DCA increased droplet volume diameter, one DCA reduced DI distance and none reduced DL distance when applied through XR tips. The DCAs did not affect DL or DI distance.

Keywords

Glyphosategrain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) ‘Topaz’Drift-control adjuvantflat-fan nozzleflood nozzleAI, air inductionAMS, ammonium sulfateDAP, days after plantingDAT, days after treatmentDCA, drift-control adjuvantDG, preorifice flat fanDI, injury driftDL, lethal driftDR, Combo-JetGR, glyphosate resistantHRC, herbicide-resistant cropsTD, TurboDropTF, Turbo FloodJetTT, Turbo TeeJetVMD, volume median diameterXR, extended range
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 893 - 897
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bode, L. E. 1987. Spray application technology. In Methods of Applying Herbicides 87. WSSA Monograph 4. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Bouse, L. F., Carlton, J. B., and Jank, P. C. 1988. Effect of water soluble polymers on spray droplet size. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 31:1633–1641.Google Scholar
Bouse, L. F., Kirk, I. W., and Bode, L. E. 1990. Effect of spray mixture on droplet size. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 33:783–788.Google Scholar
Combellack, J. H., Western, N. M., and Richardson, R. G. 1996. A comparison of the drift potential of a novel twin fluid nozzle with conventional low volume flat-fan nozzles when using a range of adjuvants. Crop Prot. 15:147–152.Google Scholar
Derksen, R. C., Ozkan, H. E., Fox, R. D., and Brazee, R. D. 1999. Droplet spectra and wind tunnel evaluation of venturi and pre-orifice nozzles. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 42:1573–1580.Google Scholar
Fietsam, J. F. W., Young, B. G., and Steffen, R. W. 2004. Differential response of herbicide drift reduction nozzles to drift control agents with glyphosate. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 47:1405–1411.Google Scholar
Grover, R., Maybank, J., Caldwell, B. C., and Wolf, T. M. 1997. Airborne off-target losses and deposition characteristics from a self-propelled, high speed and high clearance ground sprayer. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, F. R., Downer, R. A., and Latting, J. A. 1998. Improving herbicide efficacy with adjuvant/ammonium sulfate combinations. in McMullan, P. M., ed. Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. Challenges and Opportunities. in Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. Volume I. Memphis, TN: Chemical Producers and Distributors Association. Pp. 475–480.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A., Garcia-Plazaola, J. I., and Becerril, J. M. 1999. Glyphosate effects on phenolic metabolism of nodulated soybean (glycine max L. Merr). J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:2920–2925.Google Scholar
Liu, S. Hua, Campbell, R. A., Studens, J. A., and Wagner, R. G. 1996. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) as influenced by droplet size, droplet number, and herbicide concentration. Weed Sci. 44:482–488.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. A. 1986. The shikimate/arogenate pathway: link between carbohydrate metabolism and secondary metabolism. Physiol. Plant. 66:164–168.Google Scholar
Kirk, I. W. 2003. Spray mix adjuvants for spray drift mitigation—progress report. ASAE paper number 03–1060. 2003 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, July 27–30.Google Scholar
Lafferty, C. L. and Tian, L. F. 2001. The impacts of pre-orifice and air-inlet design features on nozzle performance. ASAE paper number 01–1079. 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Sacramento, CA, July 30– August 1.Google Scholar
McMullan, P. M. 2000. Utility adjuvants. Weed Technol. 14:792–797.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C. and Womac, A. R. 1997. Effect of formulation and nozzle type on droplet size with isopropylamine and trimesium salts of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:639–643.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2005. Web page: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bba/acrg0605.pdf.Google Scholar
Padgette, S. R., Kolacz, K. H., Delannay, X., Re, D. B., LaVallee, B. J., Tinius, C. N., Rhodes, W. K., Otero, Y. I., Barry, G. F., Eichholtz, D. A., Peschke, V. M., Nida, D. L., Taylor, N. B., and Kishore, G. M. 1995. Development, identification, and characterization of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line. Crop Sci. 35:1451–1461.Google Scholar
Ramsdale, B. K. and Messersmith, C. G. 2001. Drift-reducing nozzle effects on herbicide performance. Weed Technol. 15:453–460.Google Scholar
Vangessel, M. J. and Johnson, Q. R. 2005. Evaluating drift control agents to reduce short distance movement and effect on herbicide performance. Weed Technol. 19:78–85.Google Scholar
Wolf, R. E. and Frohberg, D. D. 2002. Comparison of drift for four drift-reducing flat-fan nozzle types measured in a wind tunnel and evaluated using DropletScan software. Written for presentation at the 2002 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Chicago, IL, July 28–31, 2002.Google Scholar
Wolf, R. E. 2005. Comparing downwind spray droplet deposits of four flat-fan nozzle types measured in a wind tunnel and analyzed using DropletScan software. Appl. Eng. Agric. 21:173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, W. E., Cowden, R. E., and Akesson, N. B. 1985. Drop size spectra from nozzles in high speed airstream. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 28:405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H. R., Dexter, R. W., Fox, R. D., Reichard, D. L., Brazee, R. D., and Ozkan, H. E. 1997. Effects of polymer composition and viscosity on droplet size of recirculated spray solutions. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 67:35–45.Google Scholar