Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:33:02.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fluridone and Encapsulated Acetochlor Reduce Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitor Use in a Glufosinate-Based Palmer Amaranth Management Program for Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Lewis R. Braswell ,
Charles W. Cahoon Jr. ,
Alan C. York ,
David L. Jordan  and
Richard W. Seagroves
Lewis R. Braswell
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Charles W. Cahoon Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Richard W. Seagroves
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Flumioxazin and fomesafen are commonly used to control glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in cotton and other crops, thus increasing risk to select for Palmer amaranth biotypes resistant to protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors. A field experiment was conducted to determine the potential for fluridone and acetochlor to substitute for soil-applied PPO inhibitors in a Palmer amaranth management system with glufosinate applied twice POST and diuron plus MSMA POST-directed in conservation tillage cotton. Fluridone and flumioxazin applied preplant 23 to 34 d prior to planting were similarly effective. Fluridone and acetochlor plus diuron applied PRE controlled Palmer amaranth as well as fomesafen plus diuron PRE. All systems with preplant and PRE herbicides followed by glufosinate POST and diuron plus MSMA layby controlled Palmer amaranth well. Cotton yield did not differ among herbicide treatments. This research demonstrates that fluridone and acetochlor can substitute for soil-applied PPO-inhibiting herbicides in management systems for Palmer amaranth.

Flumioxazin y fomesafen son usados comúnmente para controlar Amaranthus palmeri resistente a glyphosate en algodón y otros cultivos, lo que incrementa el riesgo de seleccionar biotipos resistentes de A. palmeri a inhibidores de protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO). Se realizó un experimento de campo para determinar el potencial de fluridone y acetochlor para sustituir inhibidores de PPO aplicados al suelo en sistemas de manejo de A. palmeri con glufosinate aplicado dos veces POST y diuron más MSMA aplicados POST-dirigido en algodón bajo labranza de conservación. Fluridone y flumioxazin aplicados 23 y 34 d antes de la siembra fueron similarmente efectivos. Fluridone y acetochlor más diuron aplicados PRE controlaron A. palmeri tan bien como fomesafen más diuron PRE. Todos los sistemas con herbicidas en presiembra y PRE seguidos por glufosinate POST y diuron más MSMA POST-dirigido controlaron A. palmeri bien. El rendimiento del algodón no difirió entre tratamientos de herbicidas. Esta investigación demuestra que fluridone y acetochlor pueden sustituir herbicidas inhibidores de PPO aplicados al suelo en sistemas para el manejo de A. palmeri.

Keywords

AcetochlordiuronflumioxazinfluridonefomesafenglufosinateMSMAPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watts.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.Herbicide resistance managementherbicide-resistant weedsPRE herbicidespreplant herbicides
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 838 - 847
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7616.

Current address: Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA 23420-2826.

Associate editor for this paper: Daniel Stephenson, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2016a) Warrant herbicide. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld9KA005.pdf. Accessed February 13, 2016Google Scholar
Anonymous (2016b) Brake F16 herbicide. http://www.sepro.com/documents/BrakeF16_label.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2016Google Scholar
Anonymous (2016c) Brake FX herbicide. http://www.sepro.com/documents/BrakeFX_label.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2016Google Scholar
Banks, PA, Merkle, MG (1979) Field evaluations of the herbicidal effects of fluridone on two soils. Agron J 71: 759–762 Google Scholar
Berard, DF, Rainey, DP, Lin, CC (1978) Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of fluridone in selected crop species. Weed Sci 26: 252–254 Google Scholar
Branson, JW, Smith, KL, Barrentine, JL (2005) Comparison of trifloxysulfuron and pyrithiobac in glyphosate-resistant and bromoxynil-resistant cotton. Weed Technol 19: 404–410 Google Scholar
Burgos, NR, Culpepper, S, Dotray, P, Kendig, JA, Wilcut, J, Nichols, R (2006) Managing herbicide resistance in cotton cropping systems. Cotton Inc Tech Bull for the Southern US. http://www.cottoninc.com/fiber/AgriculturalDisciplines/Weed-Management/Herbicide-Resistance-Cotton-Cropping-Systems/Cotton-Herbicide-Resistance.pdf. Accessed February 13, 2016Google Scholar
Burgos, NR, Salas, RA, Tranel, PJ, Song, J, Scott, RC, Barber, T, Norsworthy, JK, Nichols, RL, Glasgow, L (2016) PPO-inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth has arrived In Proceedings of the Fifty-sixth Meeting Weed Science Society of America and Sixty-ninth Meeting Southern Weed Science Society. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/38/proceedings.html. Accessed July 28, 2016Google Scholar
Burke, IC, Schroeder, M, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2007) Palmer amaranth interference and seed production in peanut. Weed Technol 21: 367–371 Google Scholar
Cahoon, CW, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Everman, WJ, Seagroves, RW (2014) An alternative to multiple protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor applications in no-till cotton. Weed Technol 28: 58–71 Google Scholar
Cahoon, CW, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Seagroves, RW, Everman, WJ, Jennings, KM (2015) Cotton response and Palmer amaranth control with pyroxasulfone applied preemergence and postemergence. J Cotton Sci 19: 212–223 Google Scholar
Corbett, JL, Askew, SD, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2004) Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol 18: 443–453 Google Scholar
Crow, WD, Steckel, LE, Montgomery, GB, Wiggins, MS (2015) Evaluation and comparison of preemergence herbicides for control of glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Page 534 in Proceedings of the 2015 Beltwide Cotton Conferences. San Antonio, TX: National Cotton Council of America Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS (2015) Weed management in cotton. Pages 70–118 in 2015 Georgia Cotton Production Guide. Publ. CSS-15-01. Athens, GA: Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54: 620–626 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, York, AC (2010) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in the United States. Pages 195–212 in Nandula, VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1997) Weed management in no-tillage bromoxynil-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 11: 335–345 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1998) Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. J Cotton Sci 2: 174–185 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1999a) Weed management in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 13: 324–333.Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1999b) Weed management and net returns with transgenic, herbicide-resistant, and non-transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Weed Technol 13: 411–420 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Batts, RB, Jennings, KM (2000) Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 14: 77–88 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Roberts, P, Whitaker, JR (2009) Weed control and crop response to glufosinate applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF’ cotton. Weed Technol 23: 356–362 Google Scholar
Dunnett, CW (1955) A multicomparisons procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 50: 1096–1121 Google Scholar
Faircloth, WH, Patterson, MG, Monks, CD, Goodman, WR (2001) Weed management programs for glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 15: 544–551 Google Scholar
Frans, RE, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46 in Camper, ND, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Gardner, AP, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Monks, DW (2006) Management of annual grasses and Amaranthus spp. in glufosinate-resistant cotton. J Cotton Sci 10: 328–338 Google Scholar
Gianessi, LP (2005) Economic and herbicide use impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manage Sci 61: 241–245 Google Scholar
Green, J, Martin, J (2016) Introduction of herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth and waterhemp biotypes across Kentucky. in Proceedings of the Fifty-sixth Meeting Weed Science Society of America and Sixty-ninth Meeting Souther Weed Science Society. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/38/proceedings.html. Accessed July 28, 2016Google Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed July 28, 2016Google Scholar
[HRAC] Herbicide Resistance Action Committee 2016 Classification of Herbicides According to Site of Action. http://www.hracglobal.com/pages/classificationofherbicidesiteofaction.aspx. Accessed: April 24, 2016Google Scholar
Hill, ZT, Norsworthy, JK, Johnson, DB, Schrage, BW, Bell, HD, Rana, SS (2013) Use of fluridone for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in Arkansas cotton. Page 324 in Proceedings of the 2013 Beltwide Cotton Conferences. San Antonio, TX: National Cotton Council of America Google Scholar
Hixson, AC (2008) Soil Properties Affect Simazine and Saflufenacil Fate, Behavior, and Performance. Ph.D. dissertation. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. 226 pGoogle Scholar
Jordan, DL, Frans, RE, McClelland, MR (1993) Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to DPX-PE350 applied postemergence. Weed Technol 7: 159–162 Google Scholar
Klingaman, TE, Oliver, LR (1994) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 42: 523–527 Google Scholar
Legleiter, TR, Bradley, KW (2008) Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci 56: 582–587 Google Scholar
MacRae, AW, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS, Kichler, JM (2013) Cotton yield loss potential in response to length of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference. J Cotton Sci 17: 227–232 Google Scholar
Marshall, MW (2014) Combinations of at-plant Brake and Reflex for weed control in cotton. Page 1047 in Proceedings of the 2014 Beltwide Cotton Conferences. New Orleans, LA: National Cotton Council of America Google Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, RS, Horak, MJ, Boyer, J (2001) Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci 49: 202–208 Google Scholar
Mehlich, A (1984) Photometric determination of humic matter in soils, a proposed method. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15: 1417–1422 Google Scholar
Meijer, AD, Edmisten, KL, Collins, GD (2016) Cotton production with conservation tillage. Pages 166–174 in 2016 Cotton Information. Publ. AG-417. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Google Scholar
Meyer, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2010) Interference of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in sweetpotato. Weed Sci 58: 199–203 Google Scholar
Montgomery, GB, Steckel, LE, Wiggins, MS, Culpepper, AS (2015) Evaluation of a new fluridone premix for Palmer amaranth control in cotton. Page 535 in Proceedings of the 2015 Beltwide Cotton Conferences. San Antonio, Texas: National Cotton Council of America Google Scholar
Moore, JW, Murray, DS, Westerman, B (2004) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) effects on the harvest and yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Technol 18: 23–29 Google Scholar
Morgan, GD, Baumann, PA, Chandler, JM (2001) Competitive impact of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield. Weed Technol 15: 408–412 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(Special issue 1):31–62 Google Scholar
Patzoldt, WL, Hager, AG, McCormick, JS, Tranel, PJ (2006) A codon deletion confers resistance to herbicides inhibiting protoporphyrinogen oxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 329–334 Google Scholar
Poirier, AH, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Chandi, A, Everman, WJ, Whitaker, JR (2014) Distribution of glyphosate- and thifensulfuron-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in North Carolina. Int J Agron 2014: 747810. DOI: 10.115/2014/747810Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Culpepper, AS, Kelton, JA, Nichols, RL, Schomberg, H (2011) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth: a threat to conservation tillage. J Soil Water Conserv 66: 265–275 Google Scholar
Reddy, KN, Locke, MA (1996) Imazaquin spray retention, foliar washoff, and runoff losses under simulated rainfall. Pestic Sci 48: 179–187 Google Scholar
Reddy, KN, Locke, MA, Wagner, SC, Zablotowicz, RM, Gaston, LA, Smeda, RJ (1995) Chlorimuron ethyl sorption and desorption kinetics in soils and herbicide-desiccated cover crop residues. J Agric Food Chem 43: 2752–2757 Google Scholar
Rowland, MW, Murray, DS, Verhalen, LM (1999) Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 45: 305–309 Google Scholar
Smith, DT, Baker, RV, Steele, GL (2000) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) impacts on yield, harvesting, and ginning in dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 14: 122–126 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS (2014) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) increases herbicide use, tillage, and hand-weeding in Georgia cotton. Weed Sci 62: 393–402 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Kichler, JM, Wallace, RD, Culpepper, AS (2011) Multiple resistance in Palmer amaranth to glyphosate and pyrithiobac confirmed in Georgia. Weed Technol 59: 321–325 Google Scholar
Spaunhorst, DJ, Johnson, WG (2016) Confirmation of protoporphyrinogen oxidase resistance in an Indiana Palmer amaranth population. in Proceedings of the Fifty-sixth Meeting Weed Science Society of America and sixty-ninth Meeting Southern Weed Science Society. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/38/proceedings.html. Accessed July 28, 2016Google Scholar
Thompson, LG, Hammond, MW (1978) Fluridone, a new broad spectrum cotton herbicide. Pages 130–132 in Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science. Sparks, NV: Western Society of Weed Science Google Scholar
Vencill, WK, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Soteres, JK, Mallory-Smith, C, Burgos, NR, Johnson, WG, McClelland, MR (2012) Herbicide resistance: toward an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Sci 60(Special Issue): 2–30 Google Scholar
Waldrep, TW, Taylor, HM (1976) 1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4(1H)-pyridinone, a new herbicide. J Agric Food Chem 24: 1250–1251 Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2013) Weed survey—southern states: broadleaf crops subsection. Page 275–287 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Birmingham, AL: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Whitaker, JR, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Culpepper, AS, Sosnoskie, LM (2011) Residual herbicides for Palmer amaranth control. J Cotton Sci 15: 89–99 Google Scholar
Wiggins, MS, Hayes, RM, Steckel, LE (2016) Evaluating cover crops and herbicides for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in cotton. Weed Technol 30: 415–422 Google Scholar
Wilcut, JW, York, AC, Jordan, DL (1995) Weed management systems for oil seed crops. Pages 343–400 in Smith, A. E., ed. Handbook of Weed Management Systems. New York, NY: Marcel-Dekker Google Scholar
Wilson, DG Jr, York, AC, Jordan, DL (2007) Effect of row spacing on weed management in glufosinate-resistant cotton. Weed Technol 21: 489–495 Google Scholar
Wuerffel, RJ, Young, JM, Tranel, PJ, Young, BG (2015) Soil-residual protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides influence the frequency of associated resistance in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci 63: 529–538 Google Scholar
York, AC (2016) Weed management in cotton. Pages 84–129 in 2016 Cotton Information. Publ. AG-417. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Google Scholar