Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:46:02.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flufenacet and Metribuzin Combinations for Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Tolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. James Grichar ,
Brent A. Besler ,
Kevin D. Brewer  and
Drew T. Palrang
W. James Grichar*
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
Brent A. Besler
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
Kevin D. Brewer
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
Drew T. Palrang
Affiliation:
Bayer Corp., Austin, TX 78739
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1999 and 2000 at seven locations in south Texas to evaluate flufenacet plus metribuzin for weed control and corn tolerance. Texas panicum control with flufenacet plus metribuzin was variable with less than 70% control in 1999 and greater than 75% control in 2000. Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory control ranged from 41 to 100%. Corn stunting (4 to 13%) was noted in soils with greater than 75% sand. Corn yields with flufenacet and metribuzin combinations were increased up to 19% over the untreated check where stunting was not observed.

Keywords

FlufenacetmetribuzinPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. #3 AMAPApitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa (L.) # IPOLATexas panicum, Panicum texanum Buckl. # PANTEcorn, Zea mays L. ‘AS986’, ‘Pioneer 3223’, ‘Pioneer 32K61’, ‘DK-668’Corn toleranceivyleaf morninggloryweed managementPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 346 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ashburn, C. A., Mueller, T. C., and Hayes, R. M. 1998. Broadleaf signalgrass (Bracharia platyphylla) control in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 16.Google Scholar
Behrens, R. 1975. Corn and weeds. Weeds Today 6: 15–18.Google Scholar
Bosnic, A. C. and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45: 276–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, K. D., Grichar, W. J., Prostko, E. P., Besler, B. A., Palrang, A. T., and Cagle, J. E. 1999. Corn tolerance and weed control with Axiom in Texas. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52: 219.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B. and DeFelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39: 232–237.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B. and Kells, J. J. 1995. Timing of total postemergence herbicide applications to maximize weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol. 9: 356–361.Google Scholar
Fausey, J. C., Kells, J. J., Swinton, S. M., and Renner, K. A. 1997. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) interference in nonirrigated corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45: 256–260.Google Scholar
Gasper, J. J., Street, J. R., Harrison, S. K., and Pound, W. E. 1999. Pendimethalin efficacy and dissipation in turfgrass as influenced by rainfall incorporation. Weed Sci. 42: 586–592.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil pH. Weed Sci. 45: 733–738.Google Scholar
Hatzois, K. K. ed. 1998. Herbicide Handbook Supplement. 7th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 6–9.Google Scholar
Hopkins, J. A., Donaldson, F. S., Komm, D. A., Palrang, A. T., Rudolph, R. D., and Bloomberg, J. R. 1998. Performance of Axiom in field corn in the southern United States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 223–224.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Bradley, P. R., Hart, S. E., Buesinger, M. L., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14: 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, L. S., Day, B. E., and Clark, W. A. 1963. Effect of incorporation and method of application on preemergence herbicides. Weeds 11: 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. V., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42: 568–573.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. P., Shaw, D. R., and Holloway, J. C. Jr. 1999. Evaluation of soil-applied herbicides in sequential programs with CGA-277476 in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 271–275.Google Scholar
Palrang, A. T., Bloomberg, J. R., Lin, H., Sleesman, J. P., and Scoggan, A. C. 1997. Weed control in conventional tillage corn and soybeans with Axiom. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 59.Google Scholar
Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten, Bayer 1997. Special issue on BAY FOE 5043. 50: 101–194.Google Scholar
Prostko, E. P., Johnson, W. C. III, and Mullinix, Benjamin G. Jr. 2001. Annual grass control with preplant incorporated and preemergence applications of ethalfluralin and pendimethalin in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15: 36–41.Google Scholar
Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1999. Herbicide incorporation techniques and equipment. In Steart, C., Stagman, J., and Garvis, M., eds. Applied Weed Science. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. pp. 371–375.Google Scholar
Smith, D. T. and Anisco, J. 2000. Corn in Texas. Web page: http://www.aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/extension/cropbriefs/com.html. Accessed: October 15, 2002.Google Scholar
Tredaway, J. A., Mueller, T. C., and Hayes, R. M. 1997. Evaluation of PRE herbicides for broadleaf signalgrass control in no-till corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 57.Google Scholar
Vizantinopoulos, S. and Katranis, N. 1998. Weed management of Amaranthus spp. in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 12: 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America. 1998. Herbicide Handbook Supplement. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 104 p.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-crop competition. A review. Corvallis, OR: International Plant Protection Center, Oregon State University. pp. 46–49.Google Scholar