Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:31:44.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of sulfonylurea chemistries for strawberry crop safety and Carolina geranium (Geranium carolinianum) efficacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2019

Shaun M. Sharpe
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Associate, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, FL, USA
Nathan S. Boyd*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, FL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Nathan S. Boyd, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, FL, USA. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

POST weed control atop the bed during strawberry production is limited to hand weeding, clopyralid, and acetyl CoA carboxylase inhibitors. Identification of additional modes of action is desirable to increase available options for producers and alleviate herbicide resistance concerns. The study objective was to screen sulfonylurea herbicides for safety of strawberry coordinated with efficacy against Carolina geranium. Herbicide treatments included metsulfuron-methyl, flazasulfuron, foramsulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, trifloxysulfuron-sodium, and rimsulfuron. Strawberry plants were heavily damaged by all herbicides apart from foramsulfuron. Although the strawberry plant was dramatically affected by the evaluated herbicides, demonstrating strong epinasty, there were no differences in resultant biomass at 31 d after treatment (DAT) compared to controls. Carolina geranium was severely injured by metsulfuron-methyl, flazasulfuron, and thifensulfuron-methyl, and moderately injured by foramsulfuron. There were consistent reductions in biomass by 31 DAT by metsulfuron-methyl and flazasulfuron. Overall, metsulfuron-methyl and flazasulfuron are suitable candidates for Carolina geranium control in row-middles. Foramsulfuron is a suitable candidate for additional field-based screening for utility in POST use in strawberry production atop the bed. Consideration toward doses, surfactants, timings, and cultivar tolerance may be necessary to minimize injury as observed in the greenhouse (15% to 20%).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Darren Robinson, University of Guelph

References

Anonymous (2011) Stinger® supplemental labeling for annual strawberry in Florida. Indianapolis IN: Dow AgroSciences LLC. 2 pGoogle Scholar
Blum, RR, Isgrigg, J, Yelverton, FH (2000) Purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) turf. Weed Technol 14:357365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, NS, Dittmar, P (2015) Impact of application time and clopyralid rate on strawberry growth and yield. Weed Technol 29:821826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, NS, Dittmar, P (2018) Evaluation of postemergence-directed herbicides for purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control in fresh-market tomato. Weed Technol 32:260266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buker, RS, Steed, ST, Stall, WM (2002) Confirmation and control of a paraquat-tolerant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) biotype. Weed Technol 16:309313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, JV, Odero, DC, MacDonald, GE, Ferrell, J, Gettys, LA (2015) Confirmation, characterization, and management of glyphosate-resistant ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) in the everglades agricultural area of south Florida. Weed Technol 29:233242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, RA, Doohan, DJ (2006) Selectivity and efficacy of clopyralid on strawberry (Fragaria ananassa). Weed Technol 20:101103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, WJ, Besler, BA, Brewer, KD (2003) Purple nutsedge control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) tolerance to sulfentrazone and halosulfuron. Weed Technol 17:485490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunnicutt, CJ, MacRae, AW, Dittmar, PJ, Noling, JW, Ferrell, JA, Alves, C, Jacoby, TP (2013a) Annual strawberry response to clopyralid applied during fruiting. Weed Technol 27:573579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunnicutt, CJ, MacRae, AW, Whitaker, VM (2013b) Response of four strawberry cultivars to clopyralid applied during fruiting stage. HortTechnology 23:301305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, KM (2010) Tolerance of fresh-market tomato to postemergence-directed imazosulfuron, halosulfuron, and trifloxysulfuron. Weed Technol 24:117120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, GR, Fennimore, SA (2001) Evaluation of low-rate herbicides to supplement methyl bromide alternative fumigants to control weeds in strawberry. HortTechnology 11:603609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMurray, GL, Monks, DW, Leidy, RB (1996) Clopyralid use in strawberries (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) grown on plastic mulch. Weed Sci 44:350354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Meister, CW (2007) Tolerance of cantaloupe to postemergence applications of rimsulfuron and halosulfuron. Weed Technol 21:3036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60 (Special Issue I):3162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekarek, RA, Monks, DW, Jennings, KM, Hoyt, GD (2013) Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) tolerance to imazosulfuron and thifensulfuron-methyl. Weed Technol 27:741746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, SM, Boyd, NS (2019) Utility of glufosinate in postemergence row middle weed control in Florida plasticulture production. Weed Technol:18Google Scholar
Sharpe, SM, Boyd, NS, Dittmar, PJ (2016) Clopyralid dose response for two black medic (Medicago lupulina) growth stages. Weed Technol 30:717724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, SM, Boyd, NS, Dittmar, PJ, MacDonald, GE, Darnell, RL (2018a) Clopyralid tolerance in strawberry and feasibility of early applications in Florida. Weed Sci 66:508515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, SM, Boyd, NS, Dittmar, PJ, MacDonald, GE, Darnell, RL, Ferrell, JA (2018b) Spray penetration into a strawberry canopy as affected by canopy structure, nozzle type, and application volume. Weed Technol 32:8084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, SM, Boyd, NS, Dittmar, PJ, MacDonald, GE, Darnell, RL, Ferrell, JA (2018c) Control recommendations for black medic (Medicago lupulina) based on growth and development in competition with strawberry. Weed Sci 66:226233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture (2018) National Agricultural Statistics Service. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed: May 6, 2019Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2014) Weed survey––southern states 2014. Vegetable, fruit and nut crop subsection. Page 288in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society 67th Annual Meeting, Birmingham, AL. Westminster, CO: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, VM, Boyd, NS, Peres, NA, Noling, JW, Renkem, J (2017) Strawberry production. Pages 293312in Vallad, G, Smith, H, Dittmar, PJ, Freeman, JH, eds. Vegetable Production Handbook of Florida 2017–2018. Gainesville, FL: University of FloridaGoogle Scholar