Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:16:00.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of sequential applications of quizalofop-p-ethyl and propanil plus thiobencarb in acetyl-coA carboxylase inhibitor–resistant rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2020

Samer Y. Rustom Jr. Open the ORCID record for Samer Y. Rustom Jr. [Opens in a new window] ,
Eric P. Webster ,
Benjamin M. McKnight  and
David C. Blouin
Samer Y. Rustom Jr.*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Eric P. Webster
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Benjamin M. McKnight
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Samer Y. Rustom Jr., School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 70803. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted in 2015 and 2016 at the H. Rouse Caffey Rice Research Station near Crowley, Louisiana, to evaluate the interactions of quizalofop and a mixture of propanil plus thiobencarb applied sequentially or mixed to control weedy rice and barnyardgrass. Visual weed control evaluations occurred at 14, 28, and 42 d after treatment (DAT). Quizalofop was applied at 120 g ai ha−1 at 7, 3, and 1 d before and after propanil plus thiobencarb were each applied at 3,360 g ai ha−1. In addition, quizalofop was applied alone and in a mixture with propanil plus thiobencarb at day 0. Control of red rice ‘CL-111’ and ‘CLXL-745’ was greater than 91% when quizalofop was applied alone at day 0, similar to control for quizalofop applied 7, 3, and 1 d prior to propanil plus thiobencarb at all evaluation dates. Control of the same weeds treated with quizalofop plus propanil plus thiobencarb applied in a mixture at day 0 was 70% to 76% at each evaluation date, similar to quizalofop applied 1 or 3 d after propanil plus thiobencarb. A similar trend in control of barnyardgrass by 88% to 97% occurred when quizalofop was applied alone and by 48% to 53% at 14, 28, and 42 DAT when the mixture was used. ‘PVL01’ rough rice yield was 4,060 kg ha−1 when treated with quizalofop alone; however, yield was reduced to 3,180 kg ha−1 when it was treated with quizalofop mixed with propanil plus thiobencarb at day 0, similar to PVL01 rice treated with quizalofop 1 or 3 d following the propanil plus thiobencarb application.

Keywords

mixturesequential applicationapplication timingweed controlquizalofoppropanilthiobencarbbarnyardgrassEchinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauvweedy rice, Oryza sativa Lrice, Oryza sativa L
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 506 - 510
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Jason Bond, Mississippi State University

References

Askew, SD, Shaw, DR, Street, JE (1998) Red rice (Oryza sativa) control and seedhead reduction with glyphosate. Weed Technol 12:504–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnwell, P, Cobb, AH (1994) Graminicide Antagonism by Broadleaf Weed Herbicides. Pesticide Sci 41:77–85Google Scholar
Beste, CE (1983) Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, O’Donovan, JT (2006) Broadleaf herbicide effects on clethodim and quizalofop-p efficacy on volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 20:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, IC, Wilcut, JW, Porterfield, D (2002) CGA-362622 antagonizes annual grass control with clethodim. Weed Technol 16:749–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, VF 3rd, Hoagland, RE, Talbert, RE (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2011) Imazethapyr plus propanil programs in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 25:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, SG, Nyuist, WE, Walker, WM (1989) Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three factor treatment designs. Agron J 81:665–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, LJ, Lee, DS, Song, ZP, Suh, HS, Lu, BR (2004) Gene flow from cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) to its weedy and wild relatives. Annal Bot-London 93:67–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corkern, CB, Reynolds, DB, Vidrine, PR, Griffin, JL, Jordan, DL (1998) Bromoxynil antagonizes johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with graminicides. Weed Technol 12:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craigmiles, JP (1978) Introduction. Page 5–6 in Eastin, EF, ed. Red rice research and control. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin B-1270Google Scholar
Crooks, HL, York, AC, Culpepper, AS, Brownie, C (2003) CGA-362622 antagonizes annual grass control by graminicides in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 17:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croughan TP, inventor; Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, Mechanical College, assignee (1999). Herbicide resistant rice. US Patent 5,952,553Google Scholar
Croughan, TP (2003) Clearfield rice: It’s not a GMO. La Agr 46:24–26Google Scholar
De Wet, JM, Harlan, JR (1975). Weeds and domesticates: evolution in the man-made habitat. Econ Bot 29:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dernoeden, PH, Fidanza, MA (1994) Fenoxaprop activity influenced by auxin-like herbicide application timing. Hort Sci 29:1518–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estorninos, LE Jr, Gealy, DR, Gbur, EE, Talbert, RE, McClelland, MR (2005) Rice and red rice interference. II. Rice response to population densities of three red rice (Oryza sativa) ecotypes. Weed Sci 53:683–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2015) Imazethapyr co-application interactions in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 29:689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2016) Imazamox plus propanil mixtures for grass weed management in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 30:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gealy, DR, Mitten, DH, Rutger, JN (2003) Gene flow between red rice (Oryza sativa) and herbicide-resistant rice (O. sativa): implications for weed management. Weed Technol 17:627–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J, Valverde, BE (2009) A strategy to provide long‐term control of weedy rice while mitigating herbicide resistance transgene flow, and its potential use for other crops with related weeds. Pest Manage Sci 65:723–731CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Bollero, GA, Stroller, EW (2003) Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 17:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, SL, Smith, RJ Jr, Talbert, RE (1992) Comparative growth and development of red rice (Oryza sativa) and rice. Weed Sci 40:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumder, ND, Ram, T, Sharma, AC (1997) Cytological and morphological variation in hybrid swarms and introgressed population of interspecific hybrids (Oryza rufipogon Griff. × Oryza sativa L.) and its impact on evolution of intermediate types. Euphytica 94:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messeguer, VM, Catala, MM, Guiderdoni, E, Mele, E (2004) A field study of pollen-mediated gene flow from Mediterranean GM rice to conventional rice and the red rice weed. Mol Breed 13:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton, BW, Shaw, DR, Kurtz, ME (1989) Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol 3:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, PF, Coble, HD (1992) Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol 6:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterholt, MJ, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM (2019) Quizalofop interactions when mixed with clomazone and pendimethalin in ACCase-resistant rice. Weed Technol 33:778–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP (2004) Imazethapyr at different rates and timings in drill- and water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Technol 18:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2003) Herbicide mixtures in water-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:836–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajguru, SN, Burgos, NR, Shivrain, VK, Stewart, JM (2005) Mutations in the red rice ALS gene associated with resistance to imazethapyr. Weed Sci 53:567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Srivastava, V, Nandula, V, Bond, JA, Scott, RC (2013) Physiological and molecular basis of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicide resistance in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). J Agric Food Chem 61:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustom, SY, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM (2018) Interactions between quizalofop-p-ethyl and acetolactate synthase–inhibiting herbicides in acetyl-coA carboxylase inhibitor–resistant rice production. Weed Technol 32:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustom, SY, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM (2019) Interactions of quizalofop-p-ethyl mixed with contact herbicides in ACCase-resistant rice production. Weed Technol 33:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Pages 254–255 in Herbicide Handbook 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1965) Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1988) Weed thresholds in southern US rice, Oryza sativa. Weed Technol 2:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr, Hill, JE (1990) Weed control technology in U.S. rice. Pages 314–327 in Grayson, BT, Green, MB, Copping, LG, eds. Pest Management in Rice. London: ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, ZP, Lu, B, Zhu, Y, Chen, J (2002) Pollen competition between cultivated and wild rice species (Oryza sativa and O. rufipogon). New Phytol 153:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, ZP, Lu, BR, Zhu, YG, Chen, JK (2003) Gene flow from cultivated rice to the wild species Oryza rufipogon under experimental field conditions. New Phytol 157:657–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudianto, E, Beng-Kah, S, Ting-Xiang, N, Saldain, NE, Scott, RC, Burgos, NR (2013) Clearfield® rice: Its development, success, and key challenges on a global perspective. Crop Prot 49:40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, RE, Burgos, NR (2007) History and management of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:324–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidrine, PR, Reynolds, DB, Blouin, DC (1995) Grass control in soybean (Glycine max) with graminicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol 9:68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Carlson, TP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Imazethapyr plus residual herbicide programs for imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 26:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, EP, Rustom, SY, McKnight, BM, Blouin, DC, Teló, GM (2019) Quizalofop-p-ethyl mixed with synthetic auxin and ACCase inhibiting herbicides for weed management in rice production. Int J Agron 2019, 10.1155/2019/6137318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Leon, CT (2005) Fenoxaprop interactions for barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice. Weed Technol 19:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar