Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:50:49.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of sequential applications of quizalofop-P-ethyl and florpyrauxifen-benzyl in acetyl CoA carboxylase-resistant rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2020

Tameka L. Sanders ,
Jason A. Bond Open the ORCID record for Jason A. Bond [Opens in a new window] ,
Benjamin H. Lawrence ,
Bobby R. Golden ,
Thomas W. Allen  and
Taghi Bararpour
Tameka L. Sanders
Affiliation:
Research Associate II
Jason A. Bond*
Affiliation:
Research/Extension Professor
Benjamin H. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Assistant Extension/Research Professor
Bobby R. Golden
Affiliation:
Associate Extension/Research Professor
Thomas W. Allen
Affiliation:
Extension/Research Professor
Taghi Bararpour
Affiliation:
Assistant Research/Extension Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Jason A. Bond, Research/Extension Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS38776. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information on performance of sequential treatments of quizalofop-P-ethyl with florpyrauxifen-benzyl on rice is lacking. Field studies were conducted in 2017 and 2018 in Stoneville, MS, to evaluate sequential timings of quizalofop-P-ethyl with florpyrauxifen-benzyl included in preflood treatments of rice. Quizalofop-P-ethyl treatments were no quizalofop-P-ethyl; sequential applications of quizalofop-P-ethyl at 120 g ha−1 followed by (fb) 120 g ai ha−1 applied to rice in the 2- to 3-leaf (EPOST) fb the 4-leaf to 1-tiller (LPOST) growth stages or LPOST fb 10 d after flooding (PTFLD); quizalofop-P-ethyl at 100 g ha−1 fb 139 g ha−1 EPOST fb LPOST or LPOST fb PTFLD; quizalofop-P-ethyl at 139 g ha−1 fb 100 g ha−1 EPOST fb LPOST and LPOST fb PTFLD; and quizalofop-P-ethyl at 85 g ha−1 fb 77 g ha−1 fb 77 g ha−1 EPOST fb LPOST fb PTFLD. Quizalofop-P-ethyl was applied alone and in mixture with florpyrauxifen-benzyl at 29 g ai ha−1 LPOST. Visible rice injury 14 d after PTFLD (DA-PTFLD) was no more than 3%. Visible control of volunteer rice (‘CL151’ and ‘Rex’) 7 DA-PTFLD was similar and at least 95% for each quizalofop-P-ethyl treatment. Barnyardgrass control with quizalofop-P-ethyl at 120 fb 120 g ha−1 LPOST fb PTFLD was greater (88%) in mixture with florpyrauxifen-benzyl. The addition of florpyrauxifen-benzyl to quizalofop-P-ethyl increased rough rice yield when quizalofop-P-ethyl was applied at 100 g ha−1 fb 139 g ha−1 EPOST fb LPOST. Sequential applications of quizalofop-P-ethyl at 120 g ha−1 fb 120 g ha−1 EPOST fb LPOST, 100 g ha−1 fb 139 g ha−1 EPOST fb LPOST, or 139 g ha−1 fb 100 g ha−1 EPOST fb LPOST controlled grass weed species. The addition of florpyrauxifen-benzyl was not beneficial for grass weed control. However, because quizalofop-P-ethyl does not control broadleaf weeds, florpyrauxifen-benzyl could provide broad-spectrum weed control in acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase–resistant rice.

Keywords

Florpyrauxifen-benzyl, quizalofop-P-ethylbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv. ECHCGvolunteer rice, Oryza sativa L. ORYSArice, Oryza sativa L. ‘PVL01’Application rateapplication timingpostfloodprefloodsequential applications
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 258 - 262
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Drew Lyon, Washington State University

References

Abit, M, Al-Khatib, K, Stahlman, P, Geier, P (2012) Response of aryloxyphenoxypropionate-resistant grain sorghum to quizalofop-P-ethyl at various rates and application timings. Weed Technol 26:14–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2017) Provisia herbicide label. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldDJK000.pdf. Accessed: December 5, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2018) Loyant herbicide label. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldE6F006.pdf. Accessed: February 19, 2019Google Scholar
Barrentine, WL, Street, JE, Kurtz, ME (1984) Postemergence control of red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 32:832–834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehring, NW, ed. (2008) Mississippi Rice Growers Guide. Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University Extension Service. 80 pGoogle Scholar
Buehring, NW, Bond, JA (2008) Rice weed control. Pages 34–43 in Mississippi Rice Growers Guide. Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University Extension Service Publication 2255Google Scholar
Burgos, NR, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2008) Red rice status after 5 years of Clearfield rice technology in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:200–208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Singh, V, Tseng, TM, Black, H, Young, ND, Huang, Z, Caicedo, AL (2014) The impact of herbicide-resistant rice technology on phenotypic diversity and population structure of United States weedy rice. Plant Phys 166:1208–1220 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, VF III, Hoagland, RE, Talbert, RE (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Bond, JA, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Economic evaluations of imazethapyr rates and timings on rice. Weed Technol 26:24–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, JB, Alexander, AL, Balko, TW, Buysse, AM, Brewster, WK, Bryan, K, Daeuble, JF, Fields, SC, Gast, RE, Green, RA, Irvine, NM, Lo, WC, Lowe, CT, Renga, JM, Richburg, JS, Ruiz, JM, Satchivi, NM, Schmitzer, PR, Siddall, TL, Webster, JD, Weimer, MR, Whitaker, GT, Yerkes, CN (2016) The discovery of ArlyexTM active and RinskorTM active: two novel auxin herbicides. Bioorgan Med Chem 24:362–371 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khodayari, KM, Smith, RJ Jr, Black, HL (1987) Red rice (Oryza sativa) control with herbicide treatments in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 35:127–129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, T, Sasaki, Y (1994) Compartmentalization of two forms of Acetyl-CoA carboxylase in plants and the origin of their tolerance toward herbicides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 9:3598–3601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, ZD, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC (2018a) Evaluation of quizalofop-P-ethyl-resistant rice for Arkansas rice production systems. Int J Ag 2018. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6315865 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, ZD, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC (2018b) Sensitivity of grass crops to low rates of quizalofop-P-ethyl. Weed Technol 32:304–308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, MS, Burgos, NR, Talber, RE (2010) Confirmation and control of propanil-resistant and quinclorac-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in rice. Weed Technol 24:226–233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, TC, Street, J (2008) Introduction. Page 2 in Mississippi Rice Growers Guide. Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University Extension Service Publication 2255Google Scholar
Norman, RJ, Slanton, NA, Roberts, TL (2013) Soil fertility. Pages 69–102 in Hardke, TJ, ed. Rice Production Handbook. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service MP192Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Burgos, NR, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2007) Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:832–839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottis, BV, Chandler, JM, McCauley, GN (2003) Imazethapyr application methods and sequences for imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:526–533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2004) Potential use of imazethapyr mixtures in drill-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 18:1037–1042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Bond, JA, Barapour, MT, Wilson, MJ, Scott, RC (2012) Resistance of Echinochloa crus-galli populations to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Int J Agron 2012:893–953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustom, SY, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, McKnight, BM (2018) Interactions between quizalofop-P-ethyl-p-ethyl and acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in acetyl-coA carboxylase inhibitor-resistant rice production. Weed Technol 32:297–303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, FP, Smith, RJ Jr, Talbert, RE (1989) Control and seedhead suppression of red rice (Oryza sativa) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol 3:238–241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, TL, Bond, JA, Lawrence, BH, Golden, BR, Allen, TW Jr, Bararpour, T (2020a) Evaluation of weed control in acetyl coA carboxylase-resistant rice (Oryza sativa) with tank-mixtures of quizalofop-P-ethyl and auxinic herbicides. Weed Technol 34:498–505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, TL, Bond, JA, Lawrence, BH, Golden, BR, Allen, TW Jr, Bararpour, T (2020b) Response of acetyl-CoA carboxylase-resistant rice cultivars and advanced lines to florpyrauxifen-benzyl [published online ahead of print June 16, 2020]. Weed Technol DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, AM (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. Pages 1243–1246 in Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
Scott, B, Norsworthy, J, Barber, T, Hardke, J (2013) Rice weed control. Pages 53–62 in Hardke, TJ, ed. Rice Production Handbook. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service MP192Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 401–402 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1988) Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 2:232–241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudianto, E, Beng-Kah, S, Ting-Xiang, N, Saldain, NE, Scott, RC, Burgos, NR (2014) Corrigendum to “Clearfield® rice: its development, success, and key challenges on a global perspective Crop Prot 55:142–144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agriculture Statistics Service (2019) Statistics by subject. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/index.php?sector=CROPS. Accessed: February 21, 2019Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2012) Weed survey-grass crops subsection. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 65:267–288 Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Linscombe, SD, Webster, E, Tan, S, Oard, J (2006) Risk assessment of the transfer of imazethapyr herbicide tolerance from Clearfield rice to red rice (Oryza sativa). Euphytica 152:75–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar