Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:51:16.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Sand Stockpiles as Potential Sources of Cranberry Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joanne Mason ,
Hilary A. Sandler  and
Laura K. Hunsberger
Joanne Mason
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts-Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA 02538
Hilary A. Sandler*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts-Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA 02538
Laura K. Hunsberger
Affiliation:
University of Maryland Cooperative Extension, Snow Hill, MD 21863
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sand stockpiles, located near commercial cranberry beds in Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington, and Wisconsin, were sampled quarterly over a 2-yr period. Samples were collected from the surface and the interior of the piles. Utilizing a simple greenhouse germination bioassay, 74 plant species representing 23 plant families were identified across all locations and samples. Plant density varied by region and by sampling depth; species richness varied by region only. More seedlings germinated from samples taken from the surface of the stockpile compared with interior samples. Almost half of all species detected in either surface or interior samples were represented by only one seedling. Fifty-nine percent of the plant species from Massachusetts and New Jersey samples, and 79% and 96% of the plant species from Wisconsin and Washington, respectively, were considered to be weeds in cranberry production. Only one-third of the identified species had wind-blown seeds; seed dispersal was by other mechanisms in almost half of the species. This survey documented the weed management implications of spreading stockpiled sand on cranberry bogs for horticultural or pest management purposes. To minimize the introduction of additional weed problems, growers and integrated pest management consultants should evaluate the seedbank potential of a stockpile prior to application of the sand to the production area.

Keywords

CranberryVaccinium macrocarpon AitIntegrated weed managementcultural practicesseedling emergencegerminationweed seed dispersalseedbank dynamics
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 58 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Averill, A. L. and Sylvia, M. M. 1998. Cranberry insects of the Northeast. East Wareham, MA: UMass Amherst Cranberry Sta. Ext. Publ. 112 p.Google Scholar
Beckwith, C. S. and Fiske, J. G. 1925. Weeds of cranberry bogs. New Brunswick, NJ: New Jersey Agric. Exp. Sta. Circ. 171. 22 p.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. 1997. Weed biology: importance to weed management. Weed Sci. 45:349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowley, S. R. 1995. A hitchhiker's guide to statistics in plant biology. Guelph, ON: Plants et al. 250 p.Google Scholar
Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. 1996. Nature and properties of soils, 11th ed. New York: Prentice-Hall. 704 p.Google Scholar
Brown, D. 1992. Estimating the composition of a forest seed bank: a comparison of the seed extraction and seedling emergence methods. Can. J. Bot. 70:1603–1612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1999. Weed population responses to weed control practices. I. Seed bank, weed populations, and crop yields. Weed Sci. 47:416–422.Google Scholar
Cardina, J. and Sparrow, D. H. 1996. A comparison of methods to predict weed seedling populations from the soil seedbank. Weed Sci. 44:46–51.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Webster, T. M., Herms, C. P., and Regnier, E. E. 1999. Development of weed IPM: levels of integration for weed management. J. Crop Prot. 2:239–267.Google Scholar
Dana, M. N. 1987. Cranberry weeds in Wisconsin. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Department of Horticulture. 33 p.Google Scholar
DeMoranville, C. J., Sandler, H. A., and Bicki, T. 1996. Sanding. East Wareham, MA: UMass Cranberry Sta. Ext. Publ. 6 p.Google Scholar
Demoranville, I. E. 1984. Weeds of Massachusetts cranberry bogs, Part 1. East Wareham, MA: Univ. of Mass. Coop. Ext. Publ. SP-148. 22 p.Google Scholar
Demoranville, I. E. 1986. Weeds of Massachusetts cranberry bogs, Part 2. East Wareham, MA: Univ. of Mass. Coop. Ext. Publ. SP-149. 24 p.Google Scholar
Eck, P. 1990. The American cranberry. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press. 420 p.Google Scholar
Else, M. J., Sandler, H. A., and Schluter, S. 1995. Weed mapping as a component of integrated pest management in cranberry production. Hort. Technol. 5:302–305.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. and Cronquist, A. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p.Google Scholar
Gross, K. L. 1990. A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in soil. J. Ecol. 78:1079–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, K. L. and Renner, K. A. 1989. A new method for estimating seed numbers in the soil. Weed Sci. 37:836–839.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, C. L. and Cronquist, A. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest: An illustrated manual. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 730 p.Google Scholar
Holm, L., Doll, J., Holm, E., Pancho, J., and Herberger, J. 1997. World weeds: Natural histories and distribution. New York: Wiley. 1129 p.Google Scholar
Holmgren, N. H. 1998. Illustrated companion to Gleason and Cronquist's manual: Illustrations of the vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden. 937 p.Google Scholar
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., and Wolfinger, R. D. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 633 p.Google Scholar
Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb's wildflower guide. Boston: Little Brown. 490 p.Google Scholar
Sandler, H. A., Else, M. J., and Sutherland, M. 1997. Application of sand for inhibition of swamp dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) seedling emergence and survival on cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) bogs. Weed Technol. 11:318–323.Google Scholar
Shawa, A. Y., Shanks, C. H., Bristow, P. R., Shearer, M. N., and Poole, A. P. 1984. Cranberry production in the Pacific Northwest. Pullman, WA: Pac. Northwest Coop. Ext Bull. PNW-247. 50 p.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., Regnier, E. E., and Nafziger, E. D. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3:155–181.Google Scholar
ter Heerdt, G. N. J., Verweij, G. L., Bekker, R. M., and Bakker, J. P. 1996. An improved method for seed-bank analysis: seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Func. Ecol. 10:144–151.Google Scholar
Uva, R. H., Neal, J. C., and DiTomaso, J. M. 1997. Weeds of the Northeast. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. 397 p.Google Scholar
Waddington, D. V., Beegle, D. B., and Gover, A. E. 1994. Nutrient concentrations of turfgrass and soil test levels as affected by soil media and fertilizer rate and placement. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 25:1957–1990.Google Scholar
Williamson, R. C. and Potter, D. A. 1997. Nocturnal activity and movement of black cutworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and response to cultural manipulations on golf course putting greens. J. Econ. Entomol. 90:1283–1289.Google Scholar