Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:55:25.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced Activity of Nicosulfuron in Combination with Soil-Applied Insecticides in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Anis Rahman
Affiliation:
Weed Research Group, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
Trevor K. James
Affiliation:
Weed Research Group, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the occurrence and the extent of interaction among four soil-applied organophosphate insecticides and the sulfonylurea herbicide nicosulfuron applied POST to corn. Nicosulfuron was damaging to corn when the crop was planted with terbufos, phorate, or fonofos applied into the open furrow. Terbufos was the most damaging and also caused damage when applied as a 17-cm band prior to or after closing the furrow, with or without incorporation. Phytotoxic symptoms appeared within 3 d of application of nicosulfuron and damage increased as the rate was increased from 53 g ai/ha to 140 g ai/ha. However, despite severe damage of up to 50% recorded in some terbufos combinations, all plants had completely recovered within 4 wk and none of the treatments had any effect on grain yield or crop maturity. No damage resulted from nicosulfuron when corn was planted with the insecticide chlorpyrifos. Efficacy data of nicosulfuron on the main weeds present are also reported.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abivardi, C. and Altman, J. 1978. Effect of cycloate and aldicarb alone and in combination on growth of three sugarbeet species (Beta spp.). Weed Sci. 30:161162.Google Scholar
2. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hays, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylurea herbicides. p. 117189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicide: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. 3rd ed. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.Google Scholar
3. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bahnson, B. M. 1990. Quackgrass control in field corn with CGA-136872 and DPX-V9360. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:86.Google Scholar
4. Blair, A. M. and Martin, T. D. 1988. A review of the activity, fate and mode of action of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 22:195219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brown, H. M. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29:263281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cink, J. H., Peeper, T. F., and Stiegler, J. H. 1985. Interaction of sulfonylurea herbicides and insecticides on wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:109.Google Scholar
7. Delvin, R. M. and Zbiec, I. I. 1990. Effect of BAS-145138 as an antidote for sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:337340.Google Scholar
8. Freeman, J. A. 1983. The response of sweet corn cultivars to combinations of thiocarbamate herbicides and the insecticide fonofos. Acta Hortic. (The Hague) 136:2934.Google Scholar
9. Hahn, R. R. 1991. Annual weed control in corn with sulfonylurea herbicides. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:32.Google Scholar
10. Holshouser, D. L., Chandler, J. M., and Smith, H. R. 1991. The influence of terbufos on the response of five corn (Zea mays) hybrids to CGA-136872. Weed Technol. 5:165168.Google Scholar
11. Kimura, F., Haga, T., Sakashita, N., Murai, S., and Fujikawa, K. 1989. SL-950, a novel sulfonylurea herbicide for corn. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds—1989:2934.Google Scholar
12. Johnson, M. D., Stahlberg, L. A., Propiglia, P. J., Pruss, S. W., and Gillespie, G. R. 1989. Interaction between postemergence applications of CGA-136872 and soil-applied insecticides in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:40.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, M. D., Vitolo, D. B., Abbott, J. D., Moseley, C. M., Pruss, S. W., and Porpiglia, P. J. 1991. Interaction between postemergence applications of GCA-136872 and soil applied insecticides in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:43.Google Scholar
14. Martin, P. R. and Rahman, A. 1989. Pasture tolerance to spring applications of the herbicide thiameturon methyl. Proc. N. Z. Weed and Pest Control Conf. 42:3538.Google Scholar
15. Mersie, W. and Foy, C. L. 1984. Safening corn against chlorsulfuron and DPX-T6376 injury. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:328334.Google Scholar
16. Miller, S. D. 1990. DPX-V9360 for weed control in corn. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 43:77.Google Scholar
17. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Leuschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn (Zea mays) under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:130136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Obrigawitch, T. T., Kenyon, W. H., and Kuratle, H. 1990. Effect of application timing on rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with DPX-V9360. Weed Sci. 38:4549.Google Scholar
19. Porpiglia, P. J., Gillespie, G. R., and Johnson, M. D. 1990. Enhanced CGA-136872 activity in combination with insecticides. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:6.Google Scholar
20. Rahman, A. 1977. Persistence of terbacil and trifluralin under different soil and climatic conditions. Weed Res. 17:145152.Google Scholar
21. Rahman, A. and James, T. K. 1983. Decreased activity of EPTC + R–25788 following repeated use in some New Zealand soils. Weed Sci. 31:783789.Google Scholar
22. Ritter, R. L. 1991. New herbicides for the control of triazine—resistant weeds in no-till corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:31.Google Scholar
23. Smart, J. R., Frazier, T. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Meinke, L. J. 1992. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron activity as influenced by formulation and application method of terbufos. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 32:11.Google Scholar
24. Thompson, M. A., Witt, W. W., Martin, J. R., and Slack, C. H. 1989. Interaction effects of DPX-V9360 and organophosphate insecticides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:278.Google Scholar
25. Watson, R. N. and Hill, M. G. 1984. Pests of maize in New Zealand. p. 4758 in Eagles, H. A. and Wratt, G. S., eds. Maize: Management to market. Agronomy Society of New Zealand, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
26. Wells, R. B., Slack, C. H., Witt, W. W., Cole, M. D., and Boltd, L. D. 1992. Effects of CGA-136872 and DPX-V9360 applied to corn treated with soil insecticides. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 32:99.Google Scholar
27. White, M. D., Bauman, T. T., and Peregrine, E. K. 1991. Corn response to postemergence grass herbicide and soil insecticide applications. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 31:68.Google Scholar
28. Yenish, J. P. and Doll, J. D. 1990. Efficacy of CGA-136872, DPX-V9360, and DPX-79406 on quackgrass (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.) control in com. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:13.Google Scholar