Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T10:19:21.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergence timing affects growth and reproduction of goosegrass (Eleusine indica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2019

Xiaoyan Ma Open the ORCID record for Xiaoyan Ma [Opens in a new window] ,
Yajie Ma ,
Hanwen Wu ,
Xiangliang Ren ,
Weili Jiang  and
Yan Ma
Xiaoyan Ma
Affiliation:
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China
Yajie Ma
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China
Hanwen Wu
Affiliation:
Principal Weeds Research Scientist, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
Xiangliang Ren
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China
Weili Jiang
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China
Yan Ma*
Affiliation:
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China
*
Author for correspondence: Yan Ma, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Goosegrass is considered one of the worst agricultural weeds worldwide. Understanding its life cycle will provide useful management information. Field experiments with six emergence times (April, May, June, July, August, and September) were conducted at Anyang, China in 2015 and 2017 to clarify the growth and reproduction of goosegrass emerging at different times within a season. The result showed that plant height, dry weight, average weight per inflorescence, total inflorescence weight, average seed number per inflorescence, and total number of seeds per plant were relatively low in the April cohort, peaked with the May or June emergence cohort, and decreased thereafter. However, the earliest emergence of goosegrass in April had the highest total number of inflorescences. The plants of the May cohort produced the greatest number of seeds: 225,954 and 322,501 seeds per plant in 2015 and 2017, respectively. Delayed emergence resulted in less seed production; most plants that emerged in September did not flower or set seed. The 1,000-seed weight did not vary among the emergence cohorts. The reproductive investment was lowest for plants of the May cohort and then increased as emergence time was delayed to June, July, and August. Fresh mature seed of all emergence cohorts was extremely dormant and had low germination only up to 6% from August to November, and high germination (44% to 93%) in December. The information gained from this study indicates that weed management strategies should focus on the early-emerged seedlings such as the April and May cohorts, so as to effectively prevent goosegrass seed production, minimize the weed seed replenishment into the soil seed bank, and reduce the infestation in subsequent seasons.

Keywords

Bradley Hanson, University of California, DavisGoosegrassEleusine indica (L.) GaertnDry weightinflorescenceseed emergenceweed seed bank
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 833 - 839
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bazzaz, FA, Ackerly, DD, Reekie, EG (2000) Reproductive allocation in plants. Pages 1–30 in Fenner, M, ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing Google Scholar
Chin, HF (1979) Weed seed-a potential source of danger. Pages 115–119 in Kwee LT, ed. Proceedings of the Plant Protection Seminar. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Malaysian Plant Protection SocietyGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2008) Germination ecology of goosegrass (Eleusine indica): an important grass weed of rainfed rice. Weed Sci 56:699–706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuah, TS, Low, VL, Cha, TS, Ismail, BS (2010) Initial report of glufosinate and paraquat multiple resistances evolved in a biotype of goosegrass (Eleusine indica [L.] Gaertn.) in Malaysia. Weed Biol Manag 10:229–233 Google Scholar
Chuah, TS, Salmijah, S, Teng, YT, Ismail, BS (2004) Changes in seed bank size and dormancy characteristics of the glyphosate-resistant biotype of goosegrass (Eleusine indica [L.] Gaertn.). Weed Biol Manag 4:114–121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daimon, N, Miura, R, Tominaga, T (2014) Growth and reproductive success of the seed-derived plants of Sagittaria trifolia emerging at different times. Weed Biol Manag 14:178–185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, GZ (2011) Characteristics on growth and reproduction of Digitaria ciliaris sowing different times on Songnen Plain. Changchun: Northeast Normal University. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Heap, I (2018) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/summary/home.aspx. Accessed: March 25, 2018Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1977) The World’s Worst Weeds–Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii. Pp. 47–53 Google Scholar
Ismail, BS, Chuah, TS, Salmijah, S, Teng, YT, Schumacher, RW (2002) Germination and seedling emergence of the glyphosate-resistant and susceptible biotype of goosegrass (Eleusine indica [L.] Gaertn.). Weed Biol Manag 2:177–185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, BS, Chuah, TS, Salmijah, S, Teng, YT (2003) Effects of shade and watering frequency on growth and development of glyphosate-resistant and susceptible biotypes of goosegrass (Eleusine indica [L.] Gaertn.). Plant Prot Quart 18:30–34 Google Scholar
Jalaludin, A, Yu, Q, Powles, SB (2015) Multiple resistance across glufosinate, glyphosate, paraquat and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in an Eleusine indica population. Weed Res 55:82–89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, GE, Devine, MD, Kirkwood, RC, Marshall, G (1995) Target enzyme-based resistance to acetyl-coenzyme a carboxylase inhibitors in Eleusine indica . Pestic Biochem Phys 51:129–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, LJ, Ngim, J (2000) A first report of glyphosate-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.) in Malaysia. Pest Manag Sci 56:336–339 3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, XY, Ma, Y, Xi, JP, Jiang, WL, Ma, YJ, Li, XF (2012) Mixed weeds and competition with directly seeded cotton, north Henan province China. Cotton Sci 24:91–96 [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Ma, XY, Wu, HW, Jiang, WL, Ma, YJ, Ma, Y (2015) Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) density effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J Integr Agr 14:1778–1785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masin, R, Zuin, MC, Archer, DW, Forcella, F, Zanin, G (2005) A predictive model to aid control of annual summer weeds in turf. Weed Sci 53:193–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMaster, GS, Wilhelm, WW (1997) Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agr Forest Meteorol 87:291–300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudge, LC, Gossett, BJ, Murphy, TR (1984) Resistance of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) to dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci 32:591–594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, SD, Yakubu, Y, Weise, SF, Swanton, CJ (1996) Effect of planting patterns and inter-row cultivation on competition between corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 44:856–870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verghis, TI, McKenzie, BA, Hill, GD (1999) Phenological development of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zeal J Crop Hort Sci 27:249–256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandscheer, ACD, Rizzardi, MA, Reichert, M (2013) Competitive ability of corn in coexistence with goosegrass. Planta Danin 31:281–289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, XC, Wu, HW, Stanton, R, Burrows, GE (2013) Time of emergence impacts the growth and reproduction of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav.). Weed Biol Manag 13:98–103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar