Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:48:31.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electronic Data Recorders for Weed Science Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ben Barstow  and
Jon P. Chernicky
Ben Barstow
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Ariz., Tucson, AZ
Jon P. Chernicky
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Ariz., Tucson, AZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most field data are recorded in a notebook or on paper in the field and later re-entered into computer files for statistical analyses. Using electronic field data recorders, data can be entered directly into computer files. Initial communication problems between electronic data recorders and personal computers and learning time requirements may limit effective use of these tools. Use of a dedicated field data recorder and software developed by the authors produced an estimated first-year labor cost savings of $500 to $700.

Keywords

Computer applicationsdata collectiondata loggerselectronic data recorders
Type
Education
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 134 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Berry, J. S., Holtzer, T. O., and Norman, J. M. 1987. Computers in the field. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 33:209.Google Scholar
2. Cook, A. F., Alexander, W. L., and King, R. G. 1986. Economical, automated data collection, storage, and transfer. Crop Sci. 26:833–834.Google Scholar
3. Cooney, T. M. 1987. Update on portable data recorders. The Compiler 5:15–22.Google Scholar
4. Demment, M. W., and Greenwood, G. B. 1987. The use of a portable computer for real-time recording of observations of grazing behavior in the field. J. Range Manage. 40:284–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Feighner, S. D., Godwoski, E. F., and Miller, B. M. 1986. Portable microcomputer-based weighing system: applications in poultry sciences. Poult. Sci. 65:868–873.Google Scholar
6. Gilreath, J. P. 1985. Description of a basic program for data collection using a portable microcomputer. HortScience 20:301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hunt, P. F., and Raven, C. A. 1985. An investigation and development of the use of hand held data loggers in the field. Field trial methods and data handling. Aspects Appl. Biol. 10:313–320.Google Scholar
8. Law, J. R., and Reeves, J. C. 1984. The use of hand held data terminals in National Institute of Agricultural Botany Field recording. J. Natl. Inst. Agric. Bot. 16:397–413.Google Scholar
9. Smith, A. D. 1985. Field data collection, our approach and its problems and successes. Field trial methods and data handling. Aspects Appl. Biol. 10:321–325.Google Scholar