Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:25:53.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of tiafenacil applied preplant alone or mixed with metribuzin for glyphosate-resistant horseweed control in soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2021

David B. Westerveld ,
Nader Soltani Open the ORCID record for Nader Soltani [Opens in a new window] ,
David C. Hooker ,
Darren E. Robinson  and
Peter H. Sikkema
David B. Westerveld
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Adjunct Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
David C. Hooker
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Darren E. Robinson
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Nader Soltani, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ONN0P 2C0, Canada. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tiafenacil is a recently developed protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase (PPO)-inhibiting herbicide from the pyrimidinedione chemical class that is proposed for use as a preplant (PP) burndown in soybean. Glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed is a troublesome weed often found in no-till systems that can dramatically reduce soybean yield; control in soybean has been variable. Five field experiments were conducted over 2019 and 2020 in commercial soybean fields with GR horseweed to determine the biologically effective dose (BED) of tiafenacil and tiafenacil + metribuzin and to compare their efficacy to currently accepted industry standard herbicide treatments in identity-preserved (IP, non-GMO), GR, and glyphosate/dicamba-resistant (GDR) soybean systems. There was no soybean injury with treatments evaluated. The calculated doses of tiafenacil for 50%, 80%, and 95% control of GR horseweed control were 21, 147, and >200 g ai ha−1, respectively, at 8 wk after application (WAA). Lower doses were calculated with the addition of metribuzin (400 g ai ha−1) to tiafenacil for 50% and 80% control, with no dose of tiafenacil + metribuzin providing 95% control. Tiafenacil + metribuzin at 25 + 400 and 50 + 400 g ai ha−1 controlled GR horseweed 88% and 93%, respectively, which was similar to the industry standards of saflufenacil + metribuzin (25 + 400 g ai ha−1) and glyphosate/dicamba + saflufenacil (1,200/600 + 25 g ai ha−1) that provided 98% and 100% control, respectively, at 8 WAA. This study presents the potential utility of tiafenacil + metribuzin as a GR horseweed management strategy in soybean.

Keywords

DicambaglyphosatemetribuzinsaflufenaciltiafenacilhorseweedConyza canadensis (L.) CronquistsoybeanGlycine max (L.) MerrBEDCanada fleabanemarestailmultiple-herbicide resistantPOST herbicidesweed management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2021 , pp. 817 - 823
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: William Johnson, Purdue University

References

Anonymous (2020) Reviton herbicide label. Tampa, FL: Helm Agro US, Inc. Pp 4–10 Google Scholar
Budd, CM, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Miller, RT, Sikkema, PH (2016a) Control of glyphosate resistant Canada fleabane with saflufenacil plus tankmix partners in soybean. Can J Plant Sci 96:989–994 Google Scholar
Budd, CM, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Miller, RT, Sikkema, PH (2016b) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) dose response to saflufenacil, saflufenacil plus glyphosate, and metribuzin plus saflufenacil plus glyphosate in soybean. Weed Sci 64:727–734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, CM, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Miller, RT, Sikkema, PH (2017) Distribution of glyphosate and cloransulam-methyl resistant Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) in Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 98:492–497 Google Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013) Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with dicamba applied preplant and postemergence in dicamba-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 27:492–496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R (1985) A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann Appl Biol 107:239–252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Johnson, WG (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) emergence, survival, and fecundity in no-till soybean. Weed Sci 56:231–236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Kruger, GR, Stachler, JM, Loux, MM, Johnson, WG (2009) Growth and seed production of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations resistant to glyphosate, ALS-inhibiting, and multiple (glyphosate ALS-inhibiting) herbicides. Weed Sci 57:494–504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Nandula, VK, Koger, CH, Shaw, DR, Reynolds, DB (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control using glyphosate-, paraquat-, and glufosinate-based herbicide programs. Weed Technol 22:16–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haring, B, Hanson, B (2020) Glufosinate and Tiafenacil Burndown Trial. University of California, Davis. https://ucanr.edu/repository/fileaccess.cfm?article=178644&p=NFLFGK. Accessed: January 4, 2020Google Scholar
Health Canada (2018) Tiafenacil Herbicide. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Pest Management Regulatory Agency Consumer Product Safety Application nos. 2018-1276, 2018-1277, and 2018-1301. https://pr-rp.hc-sc.gc.ca/pi-ip/rba-epa-eng.php?p_actv=TIAF%45NACIL. Accessed: January 5, 2021Google Scholar
Hedges, BK, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Sikkema, PH (2018) Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane in Ontario with multiple effective modes-of-action in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean. Can J Plant Sci 99:78–83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G (1979) Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci 520–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Datta, A, Scott, J, Charvat, LD (2009) Interactions between saflufenacil and glyphosate on selected broadleaf weeds. Crop Manage 8:1–15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellendorf, TG, Young, JM, Matthews, JL, Young, BG (2013) Influence of plant height and glyphosate on saflufenacil efficacy on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol 27:463–467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellendorf, TG, Young, JM, Matthews, JL, Young, BG (2015) Influence of application variables on the foliar efficacy of saflufenacil on horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 63:578–586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, RT, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Kraus, TE, Sikkema, PH (2012) Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar tolerance to saflufenacil. Can J Plant Sci 92:1319–1328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J, Ahn, YO, Nam, JW, Hong, MK, Song, N, Kim, T, Sung, SK (2018) Biochemical and physiological mode of action of tiafenacil, a new protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase-inhibiting herbicide. Pestic Biochem Physiol 152:38–44 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaner, DL (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 500 p Google Scholar
Shields, EJ, Dauer, JT, VanGessel, MJ, Neumann, G (2006) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Sci 54:1063–1067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Dille, JA, Burke, IC, Everman, WJ, VanGessel, MJ, Davis, VM, Sikkema, PH (2017) Perspectives on potential soybean yield losses from weeds in North America. Weed Technol 31:148–154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2020) Control of glyphosate-resistant marestail in identity-preserved or glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean with preplant herbicides. Am J Plant Sci 11:851–860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, LE, Main, CL, Mueller, TC (2010) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed in the United States. Pages 185–193 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: WileyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2020) EPA Proposes Registration of New Herbicide to Aid in Resistance Management. https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/epa-proposes-registration-new-herbicide-aid-resistance-management. Accessed: January 5, 2021Google Scholar
Van Acker, RE, Swanton, CJ, Weise, SF (1993) The critical period of weed control in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Weed Sci 41:194–200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, MJ (2001) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703–705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SE (2001) The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis. Can J Plant Sci 81:867–875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerveld, DB, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Sikkema, PH (2021) Biologically effective dose of bromoxynil applied alone and mixed with metribuzin for the control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed in soybean. Weed Technol. 10.1017/wet.2021.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar