Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:10:08.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Preplant Treatment Interval and Tillages on Herbicide Toxicity to Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Alex G. Ogg Jr.  and
Frank L. Young
Alex G. Ogg Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., 215 Johnson Hall, Wash. State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Frank L. Young
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., 215 Johnson Hall, Wash. State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate plus 2,4-D at 0.3 + 0.5 or 0.4 + 0.7 kg ae ha-1 applied 31 to 1 d before seeding did not affect wheat yields or grain test weights, in field experiments in conventionally tilled and no-till winter wheat. In the conventionally-tilled system in each of two years and in the no-till system in a year with 48 mm rain within 7 d before wheat was seeded, picloram applied at 0.14 kg ai ha-1 from 31 to 1 d before seeding reduced crop yields by 7 to 8%. In the conventionally-tilled system in a year with only 2 mm rain within 7 d before wheat was seeded, 2,4-D at 3.4 kg ae ha-1 and dicamba at 0.14 kg ae ha-1 applied 30 to 1 d before seeding, reduced wheat yields by 7 and 4%, respectively. Grain test weights in both tillage systems were increased slightly by picloram at 0.14 kg ha-1, but were decreased slightly by dicamba at 0.14 kg ha-1, in the year with little rain before sowing. Test weights did not differ among herbicides or tillage systems in the year with significant rain a few days before seeding.

Keywords

Dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinepicloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidwheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Daws'Conventional tillageno-tilldicambaglyphosatepicloram 2,4-DCONAR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 291 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alley, H. P., and Humburg, N. E. 1981. Vegetative top growth of field bindweed resulting from selected herbicides and/or combinations as individual or multiple treatments. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. p. 14.Google Scholar
2. Alton, J. D., and Stritzke, J. F. 1973. Degradation of dicamba, picloram, and four phenoxy herbicides in soils. Weed Sci. 21:556–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Brown, J. W., and Mitchell, J. W. 1948. Inactivation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid in soil as affected by soil moisture, temperature, the addition of manure, and autoclaving. Bot. Gaz. 109:314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1966. Dissipation of dicamba. Weeds 14:211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. De Rose, H. R., and Newman, A. S. 1947. The comparison of the persistence of certain plant growth-regulators when applied to soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 12:222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Flint, J. L., and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of glyphosate combinations with 2,4-D and dicamba on field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) . Weed Sci. 37:12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Herr, D. W., Stroube, E. W., and Ray, D. A. 1966. Effect of Tordon residues on agronomic crops. Down to Earth 21(4):17–18.Google Scholar
8. Keys, C. H., and Friesen, H. A. 1968. Persistence of picloram activity in soil. Weed Sci. 16:341–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Laning, E. R. Jr. 1963. Tordon–for the control of deep-rooted perennial herbaceous weeds in the western states. Down to Earth 19(1):3–5.Google Scholar
10. May, J. W., Hepworth, H. M., and Fults, J. L. 1967. Control of silverleaf poverty weed on winter wheat land. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Weed Control Conf. p. 105–106.Google Scholar
11. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. W., and Kutner, M. H. 1985. Residual analysis. p. 609–615 in Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design, 2nd ed. Irwin, Home-wood, IL.Google Scholar
12. Phillips, W. M. 1961. Control of field bindweed by cultural and chemical methods. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1249. 30 p.Google Scholar
13. SAS Institute, Inc. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
14. Scifres, C. J., Hahn, R. R., Diaz-Colon, J., and Merkle, M. G. 1971. Picloram persistence in semiarid rangeland soils and water. Weed Sci. 19:381–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Sprankle, P., Meggett, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Rapid inactivation of glyphosate in soil. Weed Sci. 23:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Swan, D. G. 1980. Field bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis L. Wash. State Univ., Coll. Agric. Res. Cent. Bull. 0888. 8 p.Google Scholar
17. Swan, D. G. 1982. Long-term field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control in two cropping systems. Weed Sci. 30:476–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Torstensson, N.T.L., and Aamisepp, A. 1977. Detoxification of glyphosate in soil. Weed Res. 17:209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Weed Science Society of America. 1989. 2,4-D, dicamba, glyphosate, picloram. p. 76–79, 88–91, 146–149, and 209–211 in Herbicide Handbook, Sixth Ed., Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
20. Whitesides, R. E. 1979. Field bindweed: A growth stage indexing system and its relation to control with glyphosate. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 89 p.Google Scholar
21. Wiese, A. F., and Lavake, D. E. 1986. Control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 34: 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Wilson, R. G. 1978. Field bindweed control in western Nebraska. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:142–144.Google Scholar