Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:46:19.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), Hemp Sesbania (Sesbania exaltata), and Delayed Harvest on Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chester G. McWhorter
Affiliation:
Appl. Tech. Res. Unit, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
James M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Univ. Tenn., Ames Plantation, Grand Junction, TN 38039

Abstract

The effect of delayed harvest was investigated with two soybean cultivars that were grown weed free or in competition with johnsongrass or hemp sesbania over a 3-yr period. Johnsongrass reduced the yield of early-maturing ‘Hill’ soybean 32, 35, and 36% when harvested at an average of 1, 2, or 3 wk after maturity, when compared to weed-free yields of 2490, 2430, and 2270 kg ha−1, respectively. Late-maturing ‘Lee 68’ yields were reduced 27, 29, and 39% on three harvest dates compared to weed-free yields of 2570, 2310, and 2200 kg ha−1, respectively. Seed grades of both cultivars improved with delayed harvest, but this was offset when johnsongrass was present. Hemp sesbania reduced yields of Hill 23% on the first harvest date and 26% on the second and third dates. Yields of Lee 68 were reduced 16, 22, and 28% by hemp sesbania on three successive harvest dates. The value of soybean yields adjusted for excessive foreign material, moisture, and damaged kernels was decreased by delayed harvest when hemp sesbania was present in Lee 68 and when johnsongrass was present in both cultivars.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, J. M. and McWhorter, C. G. 1976. The economics of common cocklebur control in soybean production. Weed Sci. 23:397400.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C., Wick, G. A., Warnes, D. D., Somerhalder, B. R., and Weeks, S. A. 1969. Effect of weeds on harvesting efficiency in corn, sorghum, and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:428441.Google Scholar
3. Kohn, F. 1992. Controversy continues over cleaner beans. Soy. Dig. Vol. 52, No. 10, p. 1012.Google Scholar
4. McWhorter, C. G. 1989. History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:85121.Google Scholar
5. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1976. Effectiveness of metribuzin applied preemergence for economic control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:385390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1976. Bentazon applied postemergence for economical control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:391396.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:5863.Google Scholar
8. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1981. The technical and economic effects of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 29:245253.Google Scholar
9. Nave, W. R., Tate, D. E., Butler, J. L., and Yoerger, R. R. 1973. Soybean harvesting. USDA, ARS-NC-7, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 35 p.Google Scholar
10. Nave, W. R. and Wax, L. M. 1971. Effect of weeds on soybean yield and harvesting efficiency. Weed Sci. 19:533535.Google Scholar
11. Philbrook, B. D. and Oplinger, E. S. 1989. Soybean field losses as influenced by harvest delays. Agron. J. 18:251258.Google Scholar
12. Schnug, B. and Beuerlein, J. 1987. Harvesting, drying, handling, and storage. p. 96100 in Beuerlein, J., ed. The soybean in Ohio. Ohio Coop. Ext. Serv. The Ohio State Univ. Ext. Bull. 741.Google Scholar
13. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Official grain and standards of the United States. p. 8.18.6 in Official Grain Standards of the United States. Revised ed., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar