Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:51:08.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of DPX PE350 on Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum) Growth, Yield, and Fiber Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Wayne Keeling
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
C. Gary Henniger
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
John R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401

Abstract

DPX PE350, an experimental herbicide, has shown excellent potential for controlling a wide range of problem broadleaf weeds in cotton. PPI, PRE, and POST applications of DPX PE350 at 0.1 and 0.2 kg ai/ha were evaluated under weedfree conditions in 1991 and 1992 for effects on ‘Paymaster HS26’ cotton growth, yield, and fiber quality. In 1991, DPX PE350 applied PPI, PRE, or POST did not affect cotton population, height, yield, or fiber quality. In 1992, DPX PE350 applied PPI at 0.1 or 0.2 kg/ha or PRE at 0.2 kg/ha injured the cotton and reduced yield and micronaire value.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R., Keeling, J. W., and Taylor, B. R. 1976. Succession and control of native weeds in West Texas cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:102.Google Scholar
2. Bilbro, J. D. and Ray, L. L. 1973. Effect of planting date on yield and fiber properties of three cotton cultivars. Agron. J. 65:606609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. 1979. Role of weed management in cotton production. p. 246249 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod.—Res. Conf., Phoenix, AZ. Jan. 7–11, 1979. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A., Hoveland, C. S., Brown, V. L., and Wade, R. H. 1975. Weed population shifts influenced by crop rotations and weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:6063.Google Scholar
5. Crowder, S. H., Mitchell, W. H., and Williams, C. S. 1992. DPX PE350: A new cotton herbicide. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:343.Google Scholar
6. Grymes, C. F., Chandler, J. M., and Holshouser, D. L. 1992. Weed control in cotton with sequential applications of DPX PE350. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:27.Google Scholar
7. Henniger, C. G., Keeling, J. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1992. Efficacy of DPX PE350 in cotton on the Texas Southern High Plains. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 32:4.Google Scholar
8. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1992. Summary of DPX PE350 efficacy trials in Arkansas. p. 1317 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 7–10, 1992. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
9. Keeling, J. W., Henniger, C. G., and Abernathy, J. R. 1991. Efficacy of DPX PE350 in conventional and conservation tillage cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:73.Google Scholar
10. Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and York, A. C. 1992. Efficacy of DPX PE350 in Georgia and North Carolina cotton. p. 1315. in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 7–10, 1992. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
11. Sims, B. D., House, J. L., and Gander, J. R. 1992. Weed control in cotton with DPX PE350. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:30.Google Scholar
12. Snipes, C. E. and Allen, R. L. 1992. Broadleaf weed control in cotton with DPX PE350. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:26.Google Scholar
13. Snipes, C. E., Allen, R. L., Shaw, D. R., Guy, C. B., Wells, R., and Crowder, S. H. 1992. Influence of DPX PE350, fluometuron, and MSMA on fruiting response of cotton. p. 1315 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 7–10, 1992. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar