Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:35:31.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effective Preemergence and Postemergence Herbicide Programs for Kochia Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vipan Kumar  and
Prashant Jha
Vipan Kumar
Affiliation:
Montana State University–Bozeman, Southern Agricultural Research Center, Huntley, MT 59037
Prashant Jha*
Affiliation:
Montana State University–Bozeman, Southern Agricultural Research Center, Huntley, MT 59037
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2011 through 2013 at the MSU Southern Agricultural Research Center near Huntley, MT, to evaluate the effectiveness of various PRE and POST herbicide programs for kochia control in the absence of a crop. PRE herbicides labeled for corn, grain sorghum, soybean, wheat/barley, and/or in chemical fallow were applied at recommended field-use rates. Acetochlor + atrazine, S-metolachlor + atrazine + mesotrione, and sulfentrazone applied PRE provided ≥91% control of kochia at 12 wk after treatment (WAT). Metribuzin, metribuzin + linuron, and pyroxasulfone + atrazine PRE provided 82% control at 12 WAT. PRE control with acetochlor + flumetsulam + clopyralid, pyroxasulfone alone, and saflufenacil + 2,4-D was ≤23% at 12 WAT. Paraquat + atrazine, paraquat + linuron, and paraquat + metribuzin controlled kochia ≥98% at 5 WAT. POST control with bromoxynil + fluroxypyr, paraquat, tembotrione + atrazine, and topramezone + atrazine treatments averaged 84% at 5 WAT, and did not differ from glyphosate. Control with POST-applied bromoxynil + pyrasulfotole, dicamba, diflufenzopyr + dicamba + 2,4-D, saflufenacil, saflufenacil + 2,4-D, saflufenacil + linuron was 67 to 78% at 5 WAT. Because of the presence of kochia resistant to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides at the test site, cloransulam-methyl was not a viable option for kochia control. In a separate greenhouse study, kochia accessions showed differential response to the POST herbicides (labeled for corn or soybean) tested. Tembotrione + atrazine, topramezone + atrazine, lactofen, or fomesafen effectively controlled the glyphosate-resistant kochia accession tested. Growers should utilize these effective PRE- or POST-applied herbicide premixes or tank mixtures (multiple modes of action) to control herbicide-resistant kochia accessions in the field. PRE herbicides with 8 wk of soil-residual activity on kochia would be acceptable if crop competition were present; however, a follow-up herbicide application may be needed to obtain season-long kochia control in the absence of crop competition.

Entre 2011 y 2013, se realizaron experimentos de campo en el Centro de Investigación Agrícola del Sur de MSU, cerca de Huntley, Montana, para evaluar la efectividad de varios programas de herbicidas PRE y POST para el control de Kochia scoparia en ausencia de un cultivo. Se aplicó herbicidas PRE registrados para maíz, sorgo para grano, soja, trigo/cebada, y/o barbecho químico a las dosis recomendadas para uso en campo. Acetochlor + atrazine, S-metolachlor + atrazine + mesotrione, y sulfentrazone aplicados PRE brindaron ≥91% de control de K. scoparia a 12 semanas después del tratamiento (WAT). Metribuzin, metribuzin + linuron, y pyroxasulfone + atrazine PRE brindaron 82% de control a 12 WAT. Control PRE con acetochlor + flumetsulam + clopyralid, pyroxasulfone solo, y saflufenacil + 2,4-D fue ≤23% a 12 WAT. Paraquat + atrazine, paraquat + linuron, y paraquat + metribuzin controlaron K. scoparia ≥98% a 5 WAT. Control POST con bromoxynil + fluroxypyr, paraquat, tembotrione + atrazine, y topramezone + atrazine promedió 84% a 5 WAT, y no difirió de glyphosate. El control con aplicaciones POST de bromoxynil + pyrasulfotole, dicamba, diflufenzopyr + dicamba + 2,4-D, saflufenacil, saflufenacil + 2,4-D, saflufenacil + linuron fue 67 a 78% a 5 WAT. Debido a la presencia en el lugar del estudio de K. scoparia resistente a herbicidas inhibidores de acetolactate synthase, cloransulam-methyl no fue una opción viable para el control de K. scoparia. En un estudio de invernadero, accesiones de K. scoparia mostraron respuestas diferenciadas a los herbicidas POST (registrados para maíz y soja) evaluados. Tembotrione + atrazine, topramezone + atrazine, lactofen, o fomesafen controlaron efectivamente la accesión de K. scoparia resistente a glyphosate evaluada. Los productores deberían utilizar en el campo. estas pre-mezclas o mezclas en tanque de herbicidas (múltiples modos de acción) aplicados PRE o POST para el control de accesiones de K. scoparia resistentes a herbicidas. Herbicidas PRE con 8 semanas de actividad residual en el suelo sobre K. scoparia deberían ser aceptables si la competencia del cultivo está presente. Sin embargo, una aplicación de seguimiento podría ser necesaria para obtener control de K. scoparia durante toda la temporada, en ausencia de competencia del cultivo.

Keywords

2,4-Dacetochloratrazinebromoxynilcarfentrazone-ethylclopyralidcloransulam-methyldicambadiflufenzopyrflumetsulamflumioxazinfluroxypyrfomesafenglufosinateglyphosateisoxaflutolelactofenlinuronMCPAmesotrionemetolachlorparaquatpyrasulfotolepyroxasulfonesaflufenacilsulfentrazonetembotrionethifensulfurontribenurontopramezonekochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.Glyphosate-resistant kochiaherbicide efficacyresidual controlherbicide resistance managementweed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 24 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baker, DV, Withrow, JR, Brown, CS, Beck, KG (2010) Tumbling: use of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) to examine an understudied dispersal mechanism. Invasive Plant Sci Manage 3:301–309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ (2006) Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol 20:793–814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Blackshaw, RE, Low, R, Hall, LM, Sauder, CA, Martin, S, Brandt, EN, Shirriff, SW (2013) Glyphosate- and acetolactate synthase inhibitor-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in western Canada. Weed Sci 61:310–318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffoleti, PJ, Westra, PB, Moore, F (1997) Growth analysis of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 45:691–695 Google Scholar
Cranston, HJ, Kern, AJ, Hackett, JL, Miller, EK, Maxwell, BD, Dyer, WE (2001) Dicamba resistance in kochia. Weed Sci 49:164–170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, GK, Dexter, AG, Nalewaja, JD (1982) Kochia competition and control in wheat. Proc North Cent Weed Control Conf 37:15–16 Google Scholar
Dille, JA, Stahlman, PW, Geier, PW, Riffel, JD, Currie, RS, Wilson, RG, Sbatella, GM, Westra, P, Kniss, AR, Moechnig, MJ, Cole, RM (2012) Kochia emergence profiles across the central Great Plains. Proc Weed Sci Soc Am 52:122 Google Scholar
Durgan, BR, Dexter, AG, Miller, SD (1990) Kochia (Kochia scoparia) interference in sunflower (Helianthus annus). Weed Technol 4:52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Fore, ZA (1984) Kochia biology. Weeds Today 15:5–6 Google Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Guttieri, MJ, Fletcher, FN (1993) Broadleaf weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with postemergence directed herbicides. Weed Technol 7:298–303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F (1985) Spread of kochia in the northwestern United States. Weeds Today 16:4–6 Google Scholar
Friesen, LF, Beckie, HJ, Warwick, SI, Van Acker, RC (2009) The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Can J Plant Sci 89:141–167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2014) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org Accessed January 9, 2014Google Scholar
Jha, P, Kumar, V, Reichard, N (2013) Preemergence residual herbicides: a valuable tool for weed control in glyphosate-resistant corn. Proc Weed Sci Soc Am. 33 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Datta, A, Scott, J, Klein, RN, Golus, J (2009) Problem weed control in glyphosate-resistant soybean with glyphosate tank mixes and soil-applied herbicides. Weed Technol 23:507–512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P, Reichard, N (2014) Occurrence and characterization of kochia (Kochia scoparia) populations with resistance to glyphosate in Montana. Weed Technol 28:122–130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, KL, Johnson, JM, Gover, AE, Sellmer, JC (2011) Preemergence and postemergence suppression of kochia on rights-of-way. Weed Technol 25:292–297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengistu, LW, Messersmith, CG (2002) Genetic diversity of kochia. Weed Sci 50:498–503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Manthey, FA (2002) Response of kochia (Kochia scoparia) inbreds to 2,4-D and dicamba. Weed Technol 16:50–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60:31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C, Belles, DS, Westra, PH, Nissen, SJ, Ward, SM (2009) Inheritance of resistance to the auxinic herbicide dicamba in kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 57:43–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primiani, MM, Cotterman, JC, Saari, LL (1990) Resistance of Kochia scoparia to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol 4:169–172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, SS, Stahlman, PW, Geier, PW, Thompson, CR (2012) Weed control and crop safety with premixed s-metolachlor and sulfentrazone in sunflower. Am J Plant Sci 3:1625–1631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbatella, GM, Wilson, RG (2010) Isoxaflutole shifts kochia (Kochia scoparia) populations in continuous corn. Weed Technol 24:392–396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwinghamer, TD, Van Acker, RC (2008) Emergence timing and persistence of kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 56:37–41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahlman, PW, Olson, BLS, Thompson, CR, Zollinger, RK (2010) Pyroxasulfone (KIH-485) for weed control in sunflower. Pages 1–7 in Proceedings of the 1st Australian Summer Grains Conference. Gold Coast, Australia Google Scholar
Stallings, GP, Thill, DC, Mallory-Smith, CA, Shafii, B (1995) Pollen-mediated gene flow of sulfonylurea-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 43:95–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, DO IV, Bond, JA, Landry, RL, Edwards, HM (2013) Effect of coapplied glyphosate, pyrithiobac, pendimethalin, or S-metolachlor on cotton injury, growth, and yield. Weed Technol 27:305–309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonks, DJ, Westra, P (1997) Control of sulfonylurea-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Technol 11:270–276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, J, Thompson, CR, Peterson, DE, Currie, RS, Olson, BLS, Stahlman, PW, Khatib, KA (2013) Differential kochia (Kochia scoparia) populations response to glyphosate. Weed Sci 61:193–200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherspoon, DM and Schweizer, EE (1971) Competition between sugarbeets and five densities of kochia. Weed Sci 19:125–128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, GA, Martin, AR, Haack, AE, Mahnken, GW (1994) Control of triazine-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Technol 8:748–753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, GA, Martin, AR, Mahnken, GW (1993) Control of triazine-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 41:225–231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, R, Clay, SA, Wrage, LJ (2000) Herbicide strategies for managing kochia (Kochia scoparia) resistant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 14:268–273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar