Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T11:06:58.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the Date of Initial Handweeding on the Yield of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Raphael Ambassa-Kiki  and
Jean-Claude Ngongang
Raphael Ambassa-Kiki
Affiliation:
Inst Agron. Res., P.O. Box 2067, Yaounde, Cameroon
Jean-Claude Ngongang
Affiliation:
Inst Agron. Res., P.O. Box 2067, Yaounde, Cameroon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of two dates of initial manual weeding, i.e., before flowering and after flowering, and of no weeding on yield of a local groundnut variety was studied during 1988 and 1989 at Minkoameyos, Yaounde, Cameroon, in comparison with chemical weed control method or control. The use of herbicides ametryn plus promotryn for weed control gave the best mean yield, followed by handweeding after flowering, and handweeding before flowering, in that order. The no weeding treatment had the lowest yield throughout the trial period.

Keywords

Ametryn, N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamineprometryn, N,N′-bis(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamineDigitaria nuda Schumachgoosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. ♯ ELEINtropic ageratum, Ageratum conyzoides L. (♯ AGECOBidens pilosa L. ♯ BIDPIhairy-beggarticks, wild poinsettia, Euphorbia heterophylla L. ♯ EPHHLgroundnut (peanut), Arachis hypogaea L.Chemical weed controlmanual weedingdate of initial weedingametrynprometrynAgeratum conyzoidesBidens pilosaDigitaria nudaEleusine indicaEuphorbia heterophyllaAGECOBIDPIELEINEPHHL
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 431 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akobundu, I. O., and Agyakwa, C. W. 1987. A Handbook of West African Weeds. IITA Ed., Ibadan, Nigeria, 521 p.Google Scholar
2. Ambassa-Kiki, R. 1990. An experimental site for IBSRAM Network at Minkoameyos, Yaounde. IBSRAM Proc. 10:425–440. IBSRAM, Bangkok.Google Scholar
3. Ambassa-Kiki, R., Tchienkoua, M., and Njomgang, R. 1987. Chemical weed control in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in Central Cameroon: I. Comparison of the behaviour of 3 selective herbicides under till and no-till conditions. Rev. Sci. Tech. Sér. Sci. Agron. 3(1):4–11.Google Scholar
4. Bézot, P. 1965. Six années d'expérimentation variétale sur arachide dans les zones Centre et Est du Tchad (1957–1962). Agron. Trop. 20(1):24–29.Google Scholar
5. Buchanan, G. A., and Hauser, E. W. 1982. Influence of row spacing on competitiveness and yield of peanuts. Weed Technol. 28(4):401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dense, J., and Lavabre, E. M. 1979. Crops Weed Control in the Tropics. Maisonneuve et Larose Ed., Paris, 312 p.Google Scholar
7. Feakin, S. D., ed. 1973. Pest Control in Groundnuts. Pans manual no. 2, third edition, 197 p.Google Scholar
8. Forestier, J. 1973. Caractères végétatifs, croissance et rendement de l'arachide hâtive. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Biol., 19:43–62.Google Scholar
9. Forestier, J. 1976. Résumé d'une bibliographie de l'arachide, ONAREST, Yaoundé. Multi., 194 p.Google Scholar
10. Gillier, P., and Silvestre, P. 1969. L'arachide. Maisonneuve et Larose, Ed., Paris, 292 p.Google Scholar
11. Hauser, E., and Buchanan, G. A., 1982. Production of peanuts as affected by weed competition and row spacing. Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 358, 35 p.Google Scholar
12. Iroumé, R. N., Mboussi à Moute, J. C., and Bidja Mankono, J. E. 1989. Diversité morphologique et botanique dans une collection de 14 cultivars locaux d'arachide (Arachis hypogaea L.) des hauts plateaux de l'ouest et de la vallée du Mbam—Cameroun: implications en matière de gestion des collections locales. Communication présentée à la 1ère Conférence du CCB: Ngaoundéré (Cameroun): 05-09/12/90. Multi., 15 p.Google Scholar
13. Mimbe, C. 1985. Le domaine IRA à Minkoameyos: Étude pédologique et évaluation des terres pour les cultures de l'arachide, du cacaoyer et du mais. Mém. fin Études ENSA Dschang (Cameroun). Multi., 105 p.Google Scholar
14. Roussel, O., and Djigma, A. 1978. Résultats récents obtenus avec des herbicides sur arachide et soja en Afrique tropicale équatoriale. Oléagineux, 33(11)565–572.Google Scholar