Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:57:51.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Planting Depth and Isoxaflutole Rate on Corn Injury in Nebraska

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gail A. Wicks ,
Stevan Z. Knezevic ,
Mark Bernards ,
Robert G. Wilson ,
Robert N. Klein  and
Alex R. Martin
Gail A. Wicks
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, North Platte, Concord, Scottsbluff, North Platte, and Lincoln, NE
Stevan Z. Knezevic*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, North Platte, Concord, Scottsbluff, North Platte, and Lincoln, NE
Mark Bernards
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, North Platte, Concord, Scottsbluff, North Platte, and Lincoln, NE
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, North Platte, Concord, Scottsbluff, North Platte, and Lincoln, NE
Robert N. Klein
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, North Platte, Concord, Scottsbluff, North Platte, and Lincoln, NE
Alex R. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, North Platte, Concord, Scottsbluff, North Platte, and Lincoln, NE
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at five sites in Nebraska in 2000 and 2001 to determine the effect of planting depth and isoxaflutole rate on the response of an isoxaflutole-sensitive corn hybrid, ‘Pioneer 33-G’ across variable environments. Corn was planted at depths of 2.5 and 5.0 cm, and isoxaflutole was applied PRE at the recommended (1×) and twice the recommended (2×) rate. The effects of planting depth and herbicide rate on injury varied considerably across site–years. When injury was evident, it was generally greater at the high rate of isoxaflutole (2×) and at the shallow planting depth (2.5 cm). In most site–years, corn recovered from early season injury, and yields were not reduced, except at Scottsbluff, NE, and North Platte, NE, where soils were lower in organic matter and higher in pH. Isoxaflutole rates should be carefully selected for soils with low organic matter and high pH.

Keywords

Isoxaflutole, corn, Zea mays L.Bleachingcrop injuryintegrated weed managementplanting depthstuntingyellowing
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 642 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2003. Corn: Crop Observations and Recommendation Network. Columbus, OH Ohio State University Extension Service 5 p. http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/ohioline/b472/corn.html.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Carlson, D. R. 1980. Control of weeds in an oat (Avena sativa)-soybean (Glycine max) ecofarming rotation. Weed Sci. 28:46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, J. A. 1969. Soils of Nebraska. Lincoln, NE Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska. 60.Google Scholar
Elder, J. and Dooha, D. J. 2005. Response of five vegetable crops to isoxaflutole soil residues. Weed Technol. 9:391–396.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. and Stahlman, P. W. 1997. Efficacy of isoxaflutole alone and in combinations in corn. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:81.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Besler, B. A., and Palrang, D. T. 2005. Flufenacet and isoxaflutole combinations for weed control and corn (Zea mays) tolerance. Weed Technol. 19:891–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. N., Wicks, G. A., Wilson, R. G., Martin, A. R., Roeth, F. W., and Knezevic, S. 1999. Factors affecting isoxaflutole injury to corn in Nebraska: application. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:82–83.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Sikkema, P. H., Tardif, F., Hamill, A. S., Chandler, K., and Swanton, C. J. 1998. Biologically effective dose and selectivity of RPA 201772 (isoxaflutole) for preemergence weed control in corn. Weed Technol. 12:670–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luscombe, B. M., Pallett, K. E., Loubiere, P., Millet, J. C., Melgarejo, J., and Varbel, T. E. 1995. RPA 201772: a novel herbicide for broadleaf and grass weed control in maize and sugarcane. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. 2:35–42.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. A. and Penner, D. 2005. Sensitivity of selected crops to isoxaflutole in soil and irrigation water. Weed Technol. 19:659–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., Thomas, R. J., and Sikkema, P. 2001. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 15:332–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 1996. SAS System Windows: Release 6.12. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 955.Google Scholar
Simmons, T. J. and Kells, J. J. 2003. Variation and inheritance of isoxaflutole tolerance in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 17:177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, L. E., Simmons, F. W., and Sprague, C. L. 2003. Soil factor effects on tolerance of two corn (Zea mays) hybrids to isoxaflutole plus flufenacet. Weed Technol. 17:599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1999. Weed control and corn (Zea mays) tolerance from soil-applied RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13:713–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S. and Wax, L. M. 2001. Weed control in field corn with RPA 201772 combination with atrazine and s-metolachlor. Weed Technol. 15:249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrabel, T. E. 1998. Mode of action of isoxaflutole. 1998 Corn Conference. Rancho Mirage, CA.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Klein, R. N., Wilson, R. G., Roeth, F. W., Knezevic, S., and Martin, A. R. 1999. Factors affecting isoxaflutole injury to corn in Nebraska-soils. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 54:73–81.Google Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Mortensen, D. A., Martin, A. R., and Marx, D. B. 2001. Within-field soil heterogeneity effects on herbicide-mediated crop injury and weed biomass. Weed Sci. 49:798–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G., Wicks, G. A., Klein, R. N., Roeth, F. W., Knezevic, S., and Martin, A. R. 1999. Factors affecting isoxaflutole injury to corn in Nebraska: environment. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 4:82.Google Scholar
Winnicki, J. 2000. Planting Depth—Where Yield Begins.1 p. Wellandport, ON, Canada Clark Agri Service, Inc http://www.clarkagriservice.com.Google Scholar