Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:22:57.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Herbicide Mixtures and Seeding Rate on Soft Red Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. Kent Harrison  and
James E. Beuerlein
S. Kent Harrison
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
James E. Beuerlein
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A mixture of 2,4-D with either thiameturon, DPX-L5300, or DPX-R9674 controlled common chickweed in winter wheat better than 2,4-D alone. None of these herbicides affected wheat height, lodging, or yield. Similarly, no significant differences in wheat height or lodging occurred among seeding rates. Wheat sown near South Charleston, OH, at a seeding rate of 67 kg/ha yielded significantly less than that sown at 100 or 134 kg/ha; however, there was no difference in wheat yield among seedling rates at a second location near Columbus, OH.

Keywords

DPX-L5300, methyl 2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]-N-methyl-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoateDPX-R9674, a mixture of 2:1 (w/w) thiameturon:DPX-L5300thiameturon, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidcommon chickweed, Stellaria media (L.)Vill. ♯3 STEMEwheat Triticum aestivum L. ‘Titan’2,4-DthiameturonDPX-L5300DPX-R9674herbicide antagonism
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 505 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P. 1987. Weed control in wheat. p. 396–401 in Heyne, E. G., ed. Wheat and Wheat Improvement Am. Soc. Agron. Monog. No. 13 (2nd edition). ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
2. Beuerlein, J.E. 1989. Small Grain Production. p. 41–45 in Ohio Agron. Guide. Ohio Coop. Ext Serv. Bull. 472.Google Scholar
3. Beuerlein, J. E., and Lafever, H. N. 1989. Seeding rate and row spacing effects on yield, its components, heading date, and plant height of soft red winter what. Appl. Agric. Res. 4:106–110.Google Scholar
4. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. p. 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
5. Christie, M. S., and Cornwell, M. J. 1984. DPX-T6376–A new herbicide for broadleaf weed control in cereals. Proc. N.Z. Weed Pest Control Conf. 37:272–275.Google Scholar
6. Eberlein, C. V., Miller, T. L., and Wiersma, J. V. 1988. Influence of thiameturon and DPX-L5300 on wild oats (Avena fatua) control with barban, diclofop, AC 222,293, and difenzoquat. Weed Sci. 36:792–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gorter, C. J., and Van der Zweep, W. 1964. Morphogenetic effects of herbicides. p. 235–275 in Audus, L.J., ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
8. Gressel, J., and Segel, L. A. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate of appearance of resistance: the outlook for the future. p. 337–345 in Gressel, J and LeBaron, H., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
9. Hall, C., Edgington, L. V., and Switzer, C. M. 1982. Effects of chlorsulfuron or 2,4-D upon diclofop-methyl efficacy in oat (Avena sativa). Weed Sci. 30:672–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hatzios, K. K., and Penner, D. 1982. Metabolism of Herbicides in Higher Plants. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, MN, p. 84.Google Scholar
11. Klingman, G. C. 1965. Appendix. p. 375 in Weed Control As a Science. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
12. Kolp, B. J., Sackett, R. G., Bohnenblust, K. E., and Roehrkasse, G. P. 1973. Effect of rate and date of seeding Shoshoni winter wheat on soil moisture depletion. Agron. J. 65:929–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Liebl, R., and Worsham, A. D. 1987. Effect of chlorsulfuron on diclofop phytotoxicity to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 35:383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Olson, P. J., Zalik, S., Breakey, W. J., and Brown, D. A. 1951. Sensitivity of wheat and barley at different stages of growth to treatment with 2,4-D. Agron. J. 43:77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. O'Sullivan, P. A. 1982. Response of various broadleaved weeds, and tolerance of cereals to soil and foliar applications of DPX-4189. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kirkland, K. J. 1984. Chlorsulfuron reduced control of wild oat (Avena fatua) with diclofop, difenzoquat, and flamprop. Weed Sci. 32:285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Primiani, M. M., Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Saladini, J. L. 1988. Herbicide resistance due to acetolactate synthase/acetohydroxyacid synthase insensitivity in Kochia scoparia . Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 43:113.Google Scholar
18. Qureshi, F. A., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1979. Interaction of diclofop methyl and MCPA on wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 27:202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Ross, M. A., and Harper, J. L. 1972. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment J. Ecol. 60:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Roth, G. W., Marshall, H. G., Hatley, O. E., and Hill, R. R. Jr. 1984. Effect of management practices on grain yield, test weight, and lodging of soft red winter wheat Agron. J. 76:379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Smid, A. E., and Jenkinson, R. C. 1979. Effect of rate and date of seeding on yield and yield components of two winter wheat cultivars grown in Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:939–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar