Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:20:20.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Drip-Applied Herbicides on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) in Plasticulture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Peter J. Dittmar ,
David W. Monks  and
Katherine M. Jennings
Peter J. Dittmar*
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to determine the effect of halosulfuron, imazosulfuron, and trifloxysulfuron applied through drip irrigation on yellow nutsedge. In greenhouse studies, yellow nutsedge control by halosulfuron, imazosulfuron, and trifloxysulfuron was greater (69 to 91%) than the nontreated control (0%). Yellow nutsedge treated with halosulfuron POST had a lower photosynthetic rate (0.6 to 22.6 µmol m−2 s−1) at 4, 7, and 14 d after treatment than the nontreated control (3.3 to 26.2 µmol m−2 s−1). Yellow nutsedge treated with trifloxysulfuron had lower photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance than the nontreated plants. In field studies at Clinton, NC, yellow nutsedge density increased from treatment (day 0) to 56 d after treatment in all treatments. Increase in yellow nutsedge density was 72 and 95% in drip-applied halosulfuron and imazosulfuron treatments compared with yellow nutsedge density increases of 876% for the same period in the nontreated plots. Yellow nutsedge density increased 69 and 57% at Clinton and Kinston, NC, respectively, in the drip-applied 15 g ha−1 trifloxysulfuron treatment compared with 876% in the nontreated control. In field studies at Clinton and Kinston, NC, suppression of yellow nutsedge emergence in POST and drip-applied herbicide treatments was similar. Emergence of yellow nutsedge was similar in the imazosulfuron POST and the nontreated yellow nutsedge. Based on these studies, drip-applied herbicides may be beneficial as a part of a yellow nutsedge control program, but additional measures, such as a POST herbicide, would be needed for effective control. Drip-applied herbicides may give growers an option for herbicide application after drip irrigation tape and polyethylene mulch have been installed in the current vegetable crops. This application method would also allow herbicide treatment under plastic mulch used for multicropping systems.

Se condujeron estudios de invernadero y de campo para determinar el efecto de halosulfuron, imazosulfuron y trifloxysulfuron aplicados a través de irrigación por goteo en Cyperus esculentus. En los estudios de invernadero, el control de C. esculentus por halosulfuron, imazosulfuron y trifloxysulfuron fue mayor (69 a 91%) que el testigo no tratado (0%). La C. esculentus tratada con halosulfuron POST, tuvo una tasa fotosintética menor (0.6 a 22.6 µmol m−2 s−1) a 4, 7 y 14 días después del tratamiento (DAT) comparado con el testigo no tratado (3.3 a 26.2 µmol m−2 s−1). La C. esculentus tratada con trifloxysulfuron tuvo una tasa fotosintética y una conductancia estomática menor que la no tratada. En estudios de campo en Clinton, la densidad de C. esculentus se incrementó desde el tratamiento (día 0) hasta 56 DAT, en todos los tratamientos. El incremento en la densidad de C. esculentus fue 72 y 95% en tratamientos aplicados por goteo de halosulfuron e imazosulfuron, comparado a los incrementos de densidad de C. esculentus de 876% para el mismo período de tiempo pero sin tratar. La densidad de C. esculentus se incrementó 69 y 57% en Clinton y Kinston respectivamente, en el tratamiento de 15 g ha−1 de trifloxysulfuron aplicado por goteo, comparado a un incremento de 876% en el testigo no tratado. En los estudios de campo de Clinton y Kinston, la supresión de la emergencia de C. esculentus en tratamientos de herbicidas POST y en aplicaciones por goteo fue similar. La emergencia de C. esculentus fue similar en imazosulfuron POST y la no tratada. Con base en estos estudios, los herbicidas aplicados por goteo pueden ser benéficos como parte del programa de control de C. esculentus, pero medidas adicionales tales como un herbicida POST, serían necesarias para un efectivo control. Los herbicidas aplicados por goteo pueden ofrecer a los agricultores una opción de aplicación de los mismos después que la cinta de irrigación por goteo y la cobertera de polietileno, hayan sido instaladas en el cultivo de hortalizas. Este método de aplicación permitiría también usar tratamientos de herbicida bajo cobertera de plástico en sistemas de multi-cultivo.

Keywords

Halosulfuronimazosulfurontrifloxysulfuronyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L.Sulfonylureaherbicide application methodmethyl bromide alternativesdrip irrigation
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/AREAS
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 243 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2009. Envoke® herbicide product label. Syngenta Publication No. SCP1132AL1E1210. Greensboro, NC Syngenta Group Company.Google Scholar
Adcock, C. W., Foshee, W. G. III., Wehtje, G. R., and Gilliam, C. H. 2008. Herbicide combinations in tomato to prevent nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) punctures in plastic mulch for multi-cropping systems. Weed Technol. 22:136–141.Google Scholar
Bhatti, M. A., Felsot, A. S., Parker, R., and Mink, G. 1998. Leaf photosynthesis, stomatal resistance, and growth of wine grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) after exposure to simulated chlorsulfuron drift. J. Environ. Sci. Health, B 33:67–81.Google Scholar
Buckelew, J. K., Monks, D. W., and Jennings, K. M. 2007. Response of transplanted plasticulture tomato to post-directed thifensulfuron and trifloxysulfuron. Pages 142. in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Southern Weed Science Society. Champaign, IL SWSS.Google Scholar
Candole, B. L., Csinos, A. S., and Wang, D. 2007. Concentrations in soil and efficacy of drip-applied 1,3-D + chloropicrin and metam sodium in plastic-mulched sandy soil beds. Crop Prot. 26:1801–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III., Walter, C. H. S., and Clarkson, D. T. 1988. Growth response of barley and tomato to nitrogen stress and its control by abscisic acid, water relations and photosynthesis. Planta 173:352–366.Google Scholar
Csinos, A. S., Laska, J. E., and Childers, S. 2002. Dye injection for predicting pesticide movement in micro-irrigated polyethylene film mulch beds. Pest Manag. Sci. 58:381–384.Google Scholar
Dittmar, P. J., Monks, D. W., Schultheis, J. R., and Jennings, K. M. 2008. Effects of postemergence and postemergence-directed halosulfuron on triploid watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Technol. 22:467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, P. J., Jennings, K. M., and Monks, D. W. 2010. Response of diploid watermelon to imazosulfuron POST. Weed Technol. 24:127–129.Google Scholar
Felix, J. and Boydston, R. A. 2010. Evaluation of imazosulfuron for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and broadleaf control in potato. Weed Technol. 24:471–477.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A., Haar, M. J., and Ajwa, H. A. 2003. Weed control in strawberry provided by shank- and drip-applied methyl bromide alternative fumigants. Hortscience 38:55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, R. E., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 37–38. In Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Henson, I. E. and Little, C. S. 1969. Penetration of polyethylene film by the shoots of Cyperus rotundus. PANS Pest Artic. News Summ. 15:64–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III. and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2008. Cultural control of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) in transplanted cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) by varying application timing and type of thin-film mulches. Crop Prot. 27:735–739.Google Scholar
Kemble, J. M., ed. 2010. Vegetable Crop Handbook for Southeastern United States—2010. Lincolnshire, IL Vance Publishing. Pp. 271–272.Google Scholar
Lamont, W. J. Jr. 1993. Plastic mulches for the production of vegetable crops. Horttechnology 3:35–39.Google Scholar
McElroy, S., Yelverton, F. H., Troxler, S. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2003. Selective exposure of yellow (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) to postemergence treatments of CGA-362622, imazaquin, and MSMA. Weed Technol. 17:554–559.Google Scholar
Morales-Payan, J. P., Santos, B. M., Stall, W. M., , T., and Bewick, A. 1997. Effects of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) vegetative growth and fruit yield. Weed Technol. 11:762–767.Google Scholar
Pekarek, R. A. 2008. Evaluation of a ‘Caliente’ Mustard Cover Crop, S-Metolachlor, Imazosulfuron, and Thifensulfuron-Methyl for Weed Control in Bell Pepper. . Raleigh, NC North Carolina State University. Pp. 110–111.Google Scholar
Riethmuller-Haage, , Bastiaans, I. L., Harbinson, J., Kempenaar, C., and Kropff, M. J. 2006. Influence of the acetolactate synthase inhibitor metsulfuron-methyl on the operation, regulation and organization of photosynthesis in Solanum nigrum . Photosynth. Res. 88:331–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrefler, J. W., Brandenberger, L. P., Webber, C. L. III., Roberts, W., Payton, M. E., and Wells, L. K. 2007. POST weed control using halosulfuron in direct-seeded watermelon. Weed Technol. 21:851–856.Google Scholar
Singh, S. and Singh, M. 2004. Effect of growth stage on trifloxysulfuron and glyphosate efficacy in twelve weed species of citrus groves. Weed Technol. 18:1031–1036.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Richburg, J. S. III., Wilcut, J. W., and Hawf, L. R. 1995. Effect of MON-12037 on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow (Cyperus esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Technol. 9:148–152.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2005. Mulch type affects growth and tuber production of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Sci. 53:834–838.Google Scholar
Webster, T. and Culpepper, A. 2005. Eggplant tolerance to halosulfuron applied through drip irrigation. Hortscience 40:1796–1800.Google Scholar