Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:55:45.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Bicyclopyrone on Triploid Watermelon in Plasticulture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2018

Matthew B. Bertucci ,
Katherine M. Jennings ,
David W. Monks ,
David L. Jordan ,
Jonathan R. Schultheis ,
Frank J. Louws  and
Matthew D. Waldschmidt
Matthew B. Bertucci*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, North Carolina State University, Department of Horticultural Science, Raleigh, NC, USA
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, North Carolina State University, Department of Horticultural Science, Raleigh, NC, USA
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Associate Director, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC, USA
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Jonathan R. Schultheis
Affiliation:
Professor, North Carolina State University, Department of Horticultural Science, Raleigh, NC, USA
Frank J. Louws
Affiliation:
Professor and Director, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology and National Science Foundation-Center for Integrated Pest Management, Raleigh, NC, USA
Matthew D. Waldschmidt
Affiliation:
Research Technician, North Carolina State University, Department of Horticultural Science, Raleigh, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: M. Bertucci, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607. (E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to determine watermelon tolerance and yield response when treated with bicyclopyrone preplant (PREPLANT), POST, and POST-directed (POST-DIR). Treatments consisted of two rates of bicyclopyrone (37.5 and 50 g ai ha–1), fomesafen (175 g ai ha–1), S-metolachlor (802 g ai ha–1), and a nontreated check. Preplant treatments were applied to formed beds 1 d prior to transplanting and included bicyclopyrone (37.5 and 50 g ha–1) and fomesafen (175 g ha–1), and new polyethylene mulch was subsequently laid above treated beds. POST and POST-DIR treatments were applied 14 ± 1 d after watermelon transplanting and included bicyclopyrone (37.5 and 50 g ha–1) POST and POST-DIR, and S-metolachlor (802 g ai ha–1) POST-DIR. POST-DIR treatments were applied to row middles, ensuring that no herbicide contacted watermelon vines or polyethylene mulch. At 2 wk after transplanting (WAT), 15% foliar bleaching was observed in watermelon treated with bicyclopyrone (50 g ha–1) PRE. At 3 WAT, bicyclopyrone (37.5 and 50 g ha–1) POST caused 16% and 17% foliar bleaching and 8% and 9% crop stunting, respectively. At 4 WAT, initial injury had subsided and bicyclopyrone (37.5 and 50 g ha–1) POST caused 4% and 4% foliar bleaching and 4% and 8% crop stunting, respectively. No symptoms of bleaching or stunting were observed at 6- and 8-WAT ratings. Watermelon total yield, marketable yield, total fruit number, marketable fruit number, and average fruit size were unaffected by herbicide treatments. Therefore, registration of bicyclopyrone (37.5 and 50 g ha–1) PREPLANT, POST, and POST-DIR would offer watermelon producers a safe herbicide option and a novel mode of action for weed management.

Keywords

Steve Fennimore, University of California, DavisbicyclopyronefomesafenS-metalochlorwatermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & NakaiCrop injuryherbicideHPPD
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 439 - 443
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, JI, Stall, WM, Santos, BM, Olson, SM, Ferrell, JA (2010) Critical period of interference between American black nightshade and triploid watermelon. Weed Technol 24:397–400 Google Scholar
Anonymous (2015) Conditional registration of SYN-A16003 herbicide (bicyclopyrone). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Rep. 100-1465. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000100-01465-20150424.pdf Google Scholar
Buker, RS, Stall, WM, Olson, SM, Schilling, DG (2003) Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with direct-seeded and transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Technol 17:751–754 Google Scholar
Colquhoun, J, Heider, D, Rittmeyer, R (2016) Evaluation of season-long weed management programs in red beet. Weed Technol 30(4):898–909 Google Scholar
Coolong, T, Granberry, D (2017) Commercial watermelon production. University of Georgia: Cooperative Extension Service. Rep. 996 Google Scholar
Dittmar, PJ, Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR (2010) Use of commercially available pollenizers for optimizing triploid watermelon production. HortScience 45:541–545 Google Scholar
Dittmar, PJ, Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR, Jennings, KM (2008) Effects of postemergence and postemergence-directed halosulfuron on triploid watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Technol 22(3):467–471 Google Scholar
Frans, RE, Talbert, RE, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practice. Pages 29–46 in Camper ND, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Grey, TL, Bridges, DC, NeSmith, DS (2000) Tolerance of cucurbits to the herbicides clomazone, ethalfluralin and pendimethalin. II. Watermelon. HortScience 35:637–641 Google Scholar
Hassell, RL, Schultheis, JR (2004) Seedless watermelon transplant production guidelines. https://www.clemson.edu/public/coastal/documents/seedlesstransplantquide.pdf Google Scholar
Janak, TW, Grichar, WJ (2016) Weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) as influenced by preemergence herbicides. Int J Agron 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2607671 Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Rana, N, Kruger, GR, Knezevic, SZ (2014) Confirmation and control of triazine and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase–inhibiting herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 28:28–38 Google Scholar
Johnson, WC, Mullinix, BG (2002) Weed management in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) transplanted on polyethylene-covered seedbeds. Weed Technol 16:860–866 Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Spring, JF, Jha, P, Lyon, DJ, Burke, IC (2017) Glyphosate-resistant Russian-thistle (Salsola tragus) identified in Montana and Washington. Weed Technol 31:238 Google Scholar
Lament, WJ Jr (1993) Plastic mulches for the production of vegetable crops. HortTechnology 3:35 Google Scholar
Mitchem, WE, Monks, DW, Mills, RJ (1997) Response of transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) to ethalfluralin applied PPI, PRE, and POST. Weed Technol 11:88–91 Google Scholar
Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR (1998) Critical weed-free period for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) in transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Sci 46:530–532 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, G, Griffin, T, Bagavathiannan, M, Gbur, EE (2014) In-field movement of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and its impact on cotton lint yield: evidence supporting a zero-threshold strategy. Weed Sci 62:237–249 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, et al (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(SP I):31–62 Google Scholar
Oliveira, M, Jhala, A, Gaines, T, Irmak, S, Amundsen, K, Scott, J, Knezevic, S (2017) Confirmation and control of HPPD-inhibiting herbicide-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 31:67–79 Google Scholar
Sarangi, D, Jhala, A (2017) Response of glyphosate-resistant horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.] to a premix of atrazine, bicyclopyrone, mesotrione, and S-metolachlor. Canadian J Plant Sci 97:702–714 Google Scholar
Schultheis, JR, Thompson, WB (2014) 2014 North Carolina State University watermelon cultivar trials. Hort. Series. North Carolina State University: Department of Horticultural Science. Rep. 210 Google Scholar
Terry, ER, Stall, WM, Shilling, DG, Bewick, TA, Kostewicz, SR (1997) Smooth amaranth interference with watermelon and muskmelon production. HortScience 32:630–632 Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistical Services (2017) Quick stats. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/ Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistical Services (2018) Vegetables 2017 Summary. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/VegeSumm/VegeSumm-02-13-2018.pdf Google Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2016) Survey of the most common and troublesome weeds in broadleaf crops, fruits & vegetables in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America national weed survey dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2016_Weed_Survey_Final.xlsx Google Scholar
Vinson, E, Woods, F, Kemble, J, Perkins-Veazie, P, Davis, A, Kessler, J (2010) Use of external indicators to predict maturity of mini-watermelon fruit. HortScience 45:1034–1037 Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2005) Mulch type affects growth and tuber production of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Sci 53:834–838 Google Scholar
Wilhoit, J, Coolong, T (2013) Mulching with large round bales between plastic-covered beds using a newly developed offset round-bale unroller for weed control. HortTechnology 23:511–516 Google Scholar