Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T20:55:33.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Atrazine Residue on Soybean Growth Under Three Tillage Systems and Various Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John A. Pawlak ,
James J. Kells ,
Michael Barrett  and
William F. Meggitt
John A. Pawlak
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Michael Barrett
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
William F. Meggitt
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to examine the effect of tillage on atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine] persistence in the soil and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] injury. Tillage systems evaluated were no-tillage, chisel plowing, and moldboard plowing. Reduced tillage systems, such as no-tillage or chisel plowing, resulted in greater soybean injury from atrazine residue than did moldboard plowing. Regardless of atrazine residue level, metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one] resulted in the greatest injury to soybeans. Metribuzin application in combination with atrazine residue increased soybean injury under the chisel plowed system.

Keywords

No-tillageconservation tillagemetribuzinatrazine persistence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 140 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Armstrong, D. E., Chesters, G., and Harris, R. F. 1967. Atrazine hydrolysis in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Baumann, T. T., and Ross, M. A. 1983. Effect of three tillage systems on the persistence of atrazine. Weed Sci. 31:423–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Best, J. A., and Weber, J. B. 1974. Disappearance of s-triazines as affected by soil pH using the balance-sheet approach. Weed Sci. 22:364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Best, J. A., Weber, J. B., and Monaco, T. J. 1975. Influence of soil pH on s-triazine availability to plants. Weed Sci. 23:378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Atrazine carryover in soil in a reduced tillage crop production system. Weed Sci. 28:661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R., Cavincss, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11:929–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Harris, C. I. 1967. Fate of 2-chloro-s-triazines in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15:157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hiltbold, A. E., and Buchanan, G. A. 1977. Influence of soil pH on persistence of atrazine in the field. Weed Sci. 25:515–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kells, J. J., Rieck, C. E., Blevins, R. L., and Muir, W. M. 1980. Atrazine dissipation as affected by surface pH and tillage. Weed Sci. 28:101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1977. Effects of atrazine on soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 25:101–104.Google Scholar
11. Lowder, S. W., and Weber, J. B. 1979. Atrazine retention by crop residue in reduced-tillage systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:303–307.Google Scholar
12. Lowder, S. W., and Weber, J. B. 1982. Atrazine efficiency and longevity as affected by pH, temperature, and concentration. Weed Sci. 30:273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Ross, M. A., and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied Weed Science. Purdue University. Burgess Publ. Co., Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
14. Sheer, G. M., and Moschler, M. W. 1969. Continuous corn by the no-tillage and conventional tillage methods: a six year study. Agron. J. 61:524–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar