Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:43:32.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Atrazine and Mesotrione on Centipedegrass Growth, Photochemical Efficiency, and Establishment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. Scott McElroy  and
Robert H. Walker
J. Scott McElroy*
Affiliation:
Auburn University, 201 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Auburn University, 201 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Centipedegrass is tolerant of both atrazine and mesotrione when applied separately to established turf. However, no information is available regarding the use of mesotrione or the synergistic mixture of atrazine plus mesotrione applied to centipedegrass during seeded establishment. Research was conducted to evaluate centipedegrass tolerance to various rates and combinations of atrazine plus mesotrione when applied 14 d after emergence (DAE). Experiment 1 evaluated centipedegrass tolerance to atrazine and mesotrione in a broad rate-range screen in a greenhouse environment. Variations were observed between greenhouse trial runs with respect to injury and biomass with less injury and decrease in biomass observed in run 2. Overall, atrazine alone and atrazine plus mesotrione were more injurious for a greater time period and decreased biomass more than mesotrione alone. In fact, although mesotrione alone initially reduced centipedegrass photosystem II efficiency, an overall increase in efficiency was observed 28 d after treatment (DAT). Based on experiment 1, atrazine at 0.28 kg ai/ha was the maximum rate that could be applied to seedling centipedegrass when tank mixed with mesotrione. Experiment 2 evaluated atrazine at 0.28 kg/ha plus mesotrione at 0.03 to 0.28 kg/ha on centipedegrass field establishment. Although all atrazine plus mesotrione treatments reduced centipedegrass ground cover 28 DAT; no treatment reduced centipedegrass ground cover 49 DAT.

Keywords

Atrazinemesotrionecentipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro. (Kunz) ‘Tifblair’ ERLOPSeeded establishmentturfgrass toleranceherbicide synergism
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abendroth, J. A., Martin, A. R., and Roeth, F. W. 2006. Plant response to combinations of mesotrione and photosystem II inhibitors. Weed Technol 20:267–274.Google Scholar
Armel, G. R., Hall, G. J., Wilson, H. P., and Cullen, N. 2005. Mesotrione plus atrazine mixtures for control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci 53:202–211.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Beam, J. B., and Barker, W. L. 2003. New herbicide options for seeding cool-season turfgrass in spring. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 56:85.Google Scholar
Beam, J. B., Barker, W. L., and Askew, S. D. 2004. Postemergence crabgrass control in Kentucky bluegrass. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 57:104.Google Scholar
Callahan, L. M. 1999. Registration of ‘TennTurf’ centipedegrass. Crop Sci 39:873.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E., Monaco, T. A., and Evans, J. O. 2004. Photosynthetic and growth responses of Zea mays L. and four weed species following post-emergence treatments with mesotrione and atrazine. Pest Manag. Sci 69:1079–1084.Google Scholar
Ervin, E. H., Zhang, X., and Fike, J. H. 2004. Ultraviolet-B radiation damage on Kentucky bluegrass. I. Antioxidant and colorant effects. Hortscience 39:1465–1470.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., Murphy, T. R., and Webster, T. M. 2006. Using preemergence herbicides to improve establishment of centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides) from seed. Weed Technol 20:682–687.Google Scholar
Gannon, T. W., Yelverton, F. H., Cummings, H. D., and McElroy, J. S. 2004. Establishment of seeded centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides) in utility turf areas. Weed Technol 18:641–647.Google Scholar
Gannon, T. W., Yelverton, F. H., and McElroy, J. S. 2006. Allelopathic potential of centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides). Weed Sci 54:521–525.Google Scholar
Hanna, W. W. 1995. Centipedegrass—diversity and vulnerability. Crop Sci 35:332–334.Google Scholar
Hanna, W. W., Dobson, J., Duncan, R. R., and Thompson, D. 1997. Registration of ‘TifBlair’ centipedegrass. Crop Sci 37:1017.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. C. and Young, B. G. 2002. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the foliar activity of mesotrione. Weed Sci 50:157–161.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. C., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2002. Effect of postemergence applications rate and timing of mesotrione on corn (Zea mays) response and weed control. Weed Technol 16:414–420.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1976. Effects of herbicides on establishment of centipedegrass. Agron. J. 68:852–855.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1985. Herbicide tolerance of seeded centipedegrass during establishment. Univ. Ga. Dept. Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep 482:1–8.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. J. and Carrow, R. N. 1992. Influence of soil pH and fertility programs on centipedegrass. Agron. J. 84:21–26.Google Scholar
Matringe, M., Sailland, A., Pelissier, B., Rolland, A., and Zink, O. 2005. p-Hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor-resistant plants. Pest Manag. Sci 61:269–276.Google Scholar
Maxwell, K. and Johnson, G. N. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J. Exp. Bot 51:659–658.Google Scholar
McElroy, J. S. and Breeden, G. K. 2007. Tolerance of turf-type tall fescue established from seed to postemergence applications of mesotrione and quinclorac. Hortscience 42:382–385.Google Scholar
McElroy, J. S., Breeden, G. K., and Sorochan, J. C. 2007. Hybrid bluegrass tolerance to postemergence applications of mesotrione and quinclorac. Weed Technol 21:807–811.Google Scholar
McElroy, J. S., Kopsell, D. A., and Sorochan, J. C. 2006. Evaluation of bermudagrass carotenoid compostion following mesotrione application. Proc. Agron. Soc. Am. No. 259-5.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Bartlett, D. W., Fraser, T. E. M., Hawkes, T. R., Holt, D. C., Townson, J. K., and Wichert, R. A. 2001. Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Manag. Sci 57:120–128.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. I. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pest. Biochem. Physiol 62:113–124.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. D., Karcher, D. E., and Purcell, L. C. 2001. Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis. Crop Sci 41:1884–1888.Google Scholar
Secor, J. 1994. Inhibition of barnyardgrass 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase by sulcotrione. Plant Physiol 106:1429–1433.Google Scholar
Turner, D. L. and Dickens, R. 1987. Atrazine effects on tensile strength of centipedegrass sod. Agron. J. 79:39–42.Google Scholar
Willis, J. B., Askew, S. D., and McElroy, J. S. 2007. Improved white clover control with mesotrione by tank-mixing bromoxynil, carfentrazone, and simazine. Weed Technol 21:739–743.Google Scholar
Xu, Q. and Huang, B. 2004. Antioxidant metabolism associated with summer leaf senescence and turf quality decline for creeping bentgrass. Crop Sci 44:553–560.Google Scholar