Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:47:59.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics and Efficacy of Postemergence Spurred Anoda (Anoda cristata) Control in Pinto Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark J. Vangessel  and
Phil Westra
Mark J. Vangessel
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Science, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523
Phil Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Science, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spurred anoda is an increasing weed problem in Colorado pinto bean production. This research was designed to evaluate reduced rates of bentazon and imazethapyr applied at various times for spurred anoda control and profitability. In 1993, spurred anoda control with early applications of either bentazon or imazethapyr was superior to late applications. Bentazon provided better spurred anoda control than imazethapyr in June. Spurred anoda control in 1993 was better than in 1994 due to late-emerging weeds and herbicide treatments not providing residual control. In 1994, bentazon controlled spurred anoda better than imazethapyr 1 and 3 wk after late POST, but no treatment provided commercially acceptable full-season control. The number of treatments with gross margins greater than the untreated check increased as pinto bean prices increased, but ranking of gross margin did not change due to pinto bean prices.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxideimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidspurred anoda, Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht. # ANVCRpinto bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.Gross marginreduced rate technologyCOC, crop oil concentrateEPOST, early postemergenceLPOST, late postemergenceNIS, nonionic surfactant
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 329 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bauer, T. A., Renner, K. A., Penner, D., and Kelly, J. D. 1995. Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varietal tolerance to imazethapyr, Weed Sci. 43: 417–424.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1993. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced bentazon rates and cultivation. Weed Sci. 41:447–453.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1992. Integrated weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs. Agron. J. 84:973–978.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. M. 1977. Competition of spurred anoda, velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in cotton. Weed Sci. 25:151–158.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. M. and Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1983. Yields of three cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars as influenced by spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) competition. Weed Sci. 31:303–307.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Spurred anoda: a potential weed in southern crops. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic Atmos. Admin., Agricultural Review and Management, Southern Series, No. 2. New Orleans, LA: Agricultural Research (Southern Region), Science and Education Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 19 p.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, D. L., Long, J. H., and Maddux, L. D. 1991. Using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:834–840.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392–407.Google Scholar
Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Wilcut, J. W., and Former, L. D. 1994. Utility of clomazone for annual grass and broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 8:23–27.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1975. Competitive potential of spurred anoda in soybeans and cotton. Ark. Farm Res. 24:5.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1973. Cotton weeds. Weeds Today 4:6–9.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. S. 1986. A Checklist of New York State Plants. New York Bulletin No. 458. Albany, NY: University of the State of New York, the State Education Department. 272 p.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1987. SAS User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J. 1993. Late-season interference of spurred anoda in chile peppers. Weed Sci. 41:172–173.Google Scholar
Smith, D. T. and Cooley, A. W. 1973. Spurred anoda (starweed)-seedling establishment and control in cotton. In Weed and Herbicide Research in West Texas, 1971–73. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Consolidation Progress Rep. Rep. PR-3204.Google Scholar
Solano, F., Schrader, J. W., and Coble, H. D. 1976. Control of spurred anoda in cotton. Weed Sci. 24:553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, L. E., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1990. Integrating reduced rates of postemergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:541–545.Google Scholar
Westra, P. 1992. 1993 Weed control update. Proc. Colo. Crop Prot. Inst. 22:70.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. and Miller, S. D. 1991. Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlin, R. P. 1982. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Central Florida. Tampa, FL: University Presses of Florida. 472 p.Google Scholar