Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:10:53.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Preplant Atrazine and Metolachlor in Conservation Tillage Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas D. Buhler
Douglas D. Buhler*
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Res. Unit, U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agron. Plant Genetics, Univ. Minn., St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research was conducted at Arlington, WI in 1984 and 1985 to determine the influence of application timing on weed control with atrazine and metolachlor in conservation tillage corn production systems. Early preplant treatments controlled fewer weeds than preemergence or early preplant/preemergence sequential treatments in a chisel plow system. Velvetleaf control was only 50% late in the growing season with early preplant atrazine compared with 88% with an early preplant/preemergence sequential treatment of the same amount of atrazine. In the no-till system, early preplant applications of atrazine and/or metolachlor had reduced weed control late in the growing season compared with preemergence and early preplant/preemergence sequential treatments of the same amount of herbicide. Giant foxtail control 110 d after corn planting was only 73% with an early preplant treatment compared with 99% when the same amount of herbicide was evenly divided between early preplant and preemergence applications.

Keywords

Atrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminemetolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidecorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3732’giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFAvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. ♯ ABUTHChisel plowno-tillAbutilon theophrastiSetaria faberiABUTHSETFA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 66 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buhler, D. D. 1988. Factors influencing fluorochloridone activity in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:207–214.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D., and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail, Setaria faberi, and velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti, density and control in corn, Zea mays . Weed Sci. 36:642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Doersch, R. E., and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Controlling weeds in conservation tillage corn production. Univ. Wisconsin Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. A3425.Google Scholar
4. Gebhardt, M. R., Daniel, T. C., Schweizer, E. E., and Allmaras, R. R. 1985. Conservation tillage. Science 230:625–630.Google Scholar
5. Hartwig, R. O., and Laflen, J. M. 1978. A meterstick method for measuring crop residue cover. J. Soil Water Conserv. 33:90–91.Google Scholar
6. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520–526.Google Scholar
7. Kells, J. J. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications in no-till corn and soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:42–43.Google Scholar
8. Koskinen, W. C., and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41:365–370.Google Scholar
9. Stougaard, B., and Kapusta, G. 1982. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till weed control in corn. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:195–196.Google Scholar
10. Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1985. Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production, p. 26–40 in Wiese, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited-Tillage Systems. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
11. Werling, V. L., and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36: 629–635.Google Scholar