Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:44:46.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dry Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Response to Low Rates of Selected Foliar- and Soil-Applied Sulfonylurea and Growth Regulator Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib  and
Ajit Tamhane
Kassim Al-Khatib*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Ajit Tamhane
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments on dry pea (Pisum sativum) were conducted at five locations across the United States in 1995 and 1996 to investigate the effects of low rates of chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, and dicamba applied postemergence and of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron, and clopyralid applied preplant incorporated in the soil on pea plants. Although chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, and dicamba caused significant injury symptoms on pea plants, they had little effect on yield. The lowest rates of foliar applications that caused observable symptoms were 0.035, 0.086, and 1.56 g ai/ha for chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, and dicamba, respectively, whereas chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, and dicamba rates that reduced pea yield by 25% were 0.18, 1.36, and 25 g/ha, respectively. Clopyralid caused more injury symptoms than metsulfuron or chlorsulfuron with soil application. However, the lowest rates of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron, and clopyralid that caused observable symptoms were lower than the rates that reduced yield. This study showed that pea plants can sustain some level of plant injury without a large reduction in yield.

Keywords

Chlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl] benzenesulfonamideclopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidmetsulfuron, 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl] benzoic acidthifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic aciddry pea, Pisum sativum L.Chlorsulfuronclopyraliddicambafoliar symptomsmetsulfuronthifensulfuronyieldPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporated
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 753 - 758
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution 99-128J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K., Parker, R., and Fuerst, E. P. 1992a. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) response to simulated herbicide spray drift. Weed Technol. 6:956–960.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Parker, R., and Fuerst, E. P. 1992b. Sweet cherry (Primus avium) response to simulated drift from selected herbicides. Weed Technol. 6:975–979.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Parker, R., and Fuerst, E. P. 1992c. Foliar absorption and translocation of herbicides from aqueous solution and treated soil. Weed Sci. 40:281–287.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Boydston, R., Parker, R., and Fuerst, E. P. 1992d. Atrazine phytotoxicity to common bean and redroot pigweed under different temperatures. Weed Sci. 40:364–370.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Parker, R., and Fuerst, E. P. 1993a. Wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) response to simulated herbicide drift. Weed Technol. 7:97–102.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Mink, G. I., Reisenauer, G., Parker, R., Westberg, H., and Lamb, B. 1993b. Development of a biologically-based system for detection and tracking of airborne herbicides. Weed Technol. 7:404–410.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Gealy, D. R., and Boerboom, C. M. 1994. Effect of thifensulfuron concentration and droplet size on phytotoxicity, absorption, and translocation in pea (Pisum sativum). Weed Sci. 42:482–486.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. A. and Kapusta, G. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to simulated drift of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:740–745.Google Scholar
Bechhofer, R. E. and Dunnett, C. W. 1988. Tables of percentage points of multivariate student t distributions. Selected Tables in Math. Stat 11:1–317.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicide Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel Dekker pp. 117–189.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. S., Pfeeger, T. G., and Ratsch, H. C. 1995. Chlorsulfuron influence on garden pea reproduction. Physiol. Plant. 94:261–267.Google Scholar
Gealy, D. R., Boerboom, C. M., and Ogg, A. G. 1995. Growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris L.) sprayed with low rates of sulfonylurea and phenoxy herbicides. Weed Sci. 43:640–647.Google Scholar
Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. C. 1987. Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: John Wiley Press. 3 p.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A. and Thill, D. C. 1993. Simulated thifensulfuron–tribenuron drift injury to spring peas. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 46:11.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R. 1987. Effect of soil moisture on the efficacy and selectivity of soil-applied herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 3:19–34.Google Scholar
Obrigawitch, T. T., Cook, G., and Wetherington, J. 1998. Assessment of effects on non-target plants from sulfonylurea herbicides using field approaches Pestic. Sci. 52:199–217.Google Scholar
Olson, B. L., Al-Khatib, K., Stahlman, P., Parish, S., and Moran, S. 1998. Absorption and translocation of MON 37500 in wheat and other grass species. Weed Sci. 46:37–40.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. pp. 83–140.Google Scholar
Tamhane, A. C., Hochberg, Y., and Dunnett, C. W. 1996. Multiple test procedures for dose finding. Biometrics 52:21–37.Google Scholar
Wall, D. 1994a. Tolerance of five broadleaf crops to simulated thifensulfuron : tribenuron (2:1) spray drift. Weed Technol. 8:785–793.Google Scholar
Wall, D. A. 1994b. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) response to simulated drift of dicamba, clopyralid, and tribenuron. Weed Sci. 42:110–114.Google Scholar
Wall, D. 1997. Effect of crop growth stage on tolerance to low doses of thifensulfuron : tribenuron. Weed Sci. 45:538–545.Google Scholar