Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:22:57.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) Control with Dinitroaniline Herbicides in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jean H. Dawson*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Cent., Prosser, WA 99350

Abstract

For effective full-season control of dodder in alfalfa produced for seed, herbicides applied to soil in late winter or early spring should remain active through June. Pendimethalin or prodiamine at 2.2 kg ai ha-1 applied in mid March controlled 97 to 100% of dodder through May and 92 to 100% through June. At 3.4 kg ha-1, both controlled 96 to 100% of dodder through June each year, and control of 95 or 96% persisted through July in 1 of 3 yr. In the greenhouse, trifluralin was only about 1/8 as active against dodder as pendimethalin and prodiamine. In the field, trifluralin at 2.2 kg ai ha-1 controlled dodder satisfactorily through May in 3 of 4 yr and through June in 1 of 4 yr. At 4.5 kg ha-1, trifluralin controlled 99% of dodder through May in each of 3 yr; control was satisfactory through June in 2 of 3 yr. Oryzalin was less effective than the other three dinitroaniline herbicides. A standard herbicide, chlorpropham at 6.7 kg ai ha-1, controlled 97 to 100% of dodder through May, but control usually did not persist through June. Another standard herbicide, DCPA at 11.2 kg ai ha-1, controlled 97 or 98% of dodder through June in 2 of 3 yr. Pendimethalin and prodiamine at 3.4 and 6.7 kg ai ha-1 did not affect the yield or quality of seed produced by established alfalfa. Heavy sprinkler irrigation (15 cm of water) after application did not diminish dodder control from pendimethalin or prodiamine.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R., and Keeling, J. W. 1979. Efficacy and rotational crop response to levels and dates of dinitroaniline herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 27:312317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Prolonged emergence of field dodder. Weeds 13:373374.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. 1966. Response of field dodder to shade. Weeds 14:45.Google Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1966. Factors affecting dodder control with granular CIPC. Weeds 14:255259.Google Scholar
5. Dawson, J. H. 1967. Soil-applied herbicides for dodder control: initial greenhouse evaluation. Wash. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 691.Google Scholar
6. Dawson, J. H. 1969. Longevity of dodder control by soil-applied herbicides in the greenhouse. Weed Sci. 17:295298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dawson, J. H. 1970. Dodder control in alfalfa with dichlobenil. Weed Sci. 18:225230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Dawson, J. H. 1978. Control of dodder (Cuscuta spp.) with pronamide. Weed Sci. 26:660664.Google Scholar
9. Dawson, J. H., Ashton, F. M., Welker, W. V., Frank, J. R., and Buchanan, G. A. 1984. Dodder and its control. U.S. Dep. Agric. Farmers' Bull. 2276.Google Scholar
10. Devlin, R. M., and Deubert, K. H. 1980. Control of swamp dodder (Cuscuta gronovii, parasitic weed) on cranberry bogs with butralin. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 11:112113.Google Scholar
11. Gimesi, A. 1987. Chemical control of Cuscuta species. p. 249252 in Weber, H. C. and Forstreuter, W., ed. Parasitic Flowering Plants. Marburg, F.R.G. Google Scholar
12. Orloff, S. B., and Cudney, D. W. 1987. Control of dodder in alfalfa with dinitroaniline herbicides. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 40:98103.Google Scholar