Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:25:58.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diuron Sorption by Pine-Bark Substrate and Foliar vs. Root Absorption by Yellow Woodsorrel (Oxalis stricta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Carey V. Simpson ,
Glenn Wehtje ,
Charles H. Gilliam ,
Jeff L. Sibley  and
James E. Altland
Carey V. Simpson
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Auburn University, AL 36849-5412
Glenn Wehtje*
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Auburn University, AL 36849-5412
Charles H. Gilliam
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Auburn University, AL 36849-5412
Jeff L. Sibley
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Auburn University, AL 36849-5412
James E. Altland
Affiliation:
North Willamette Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Aurora, OR 97002
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Postemergence-applied diuron effectively controls yellow woodsorrel in nursery crops grown in pine bark–based container substrate. Whether the phytotoxicity of diuron on yellow woodsorrel is exclusively the result of foliar activity or is partially the result of root-based activity has not been determined. Application in which diuron was allowed to contact both the foliage and the pine bark–based substrate provided 84% control as determined by shoot fresh-weight reduction relative to that of a nontreated control. Foliar-only and root-only applications provided 52 and 12% shoot fresh-weight reduction, respectively. Absorption and translocation of foliar-applied diuron by yellow woodsorrel was evaluated using radiotracer techniques. After 24 h, 86% of the applied diuron had been absorbed, and 76% of the amount applied remained in the treated leaflet, indicating minimal translocation. Diuron sorption by the pine bark–based substrate was evaluated using radiotracer techniques. After 3 h, less than 6% of applied diuron remained in the aqueous phase, indicating 94% sorption. Exposing yellow woodsorrel roots to diuron concentrations as low as 0.50 mg/L resulted in injury, and concentrations equal to or greater than 10 mg/L resulted in death. Calculations described herein indicate the concentration that probably would occur within the aqueous solution held within the substrate following a 1.12-kg ai/ha application is sufficient to be phytotoxic to yellow woodsorrel. Thus, root-based absorption is a contributing factor in the overall efficacy of postemergence-applied diuron in controlling yellow woodsorrel.

Keywords

Diuronyellow woodsorrel, Oxalis stricta L. # OXASTHerbicide translocationsoil sorptionANOVA, analysis of variancePPFD, photosynthetic photon flux densityWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 532 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adams, F., Burmester, C., Hue, N. V., and Long, L. F. 1982. A comparison of column displacement and centrifugation methods of obtaining soil solution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 44:733–735.Google Scholar
Ahrens, J. F., Barolli, S., and Gray, R. 2003. Evaluation of sprayable herbicides for container grown ornamentals. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:36.Google Scholar
Barolli, S., Ahrens, J. F., and Gray, R. 2003. Improved methods of applying herbicides in container-grown ornamentals. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:45.Google Scholar
Bayer, D. E. and Drever, H. R. 1965. The effects of surfactants on efficiency of foliar-applied diuron. Weeds 13:222–226.Google Scholar
Bayer, D. E. and Yamaguchi, S. 1965. Absorption and distribution of diuron-C14 . Weeds 13:232–235.Google Scholar
Cross, G. B. and Skroch, W. A. 1992. Quantification of weed seed contamination and weed development in container nurseries. J. Environ. Hort. 10:159–161.Google Scholar
Gad, S. C. and Weil, C. S. 1989. Statistics for toxicologists. in Hayes, A. W., ed. Principles and Methods of Toxicology. New York: Raven. Pp. 435–484.Google Scholar
Gilliam, C. H., Foster, W. J., Adrain, J. L., and Shumack, R. L. 1990. A survey of weed control costs and strategies in container production nurseries. J. Environ. Hort. 8:133–135.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. J., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G., and Hajek, B. F. 1989. Sorption and mobility of chlorimuron in Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 37:428–433.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. F. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.Google Scholar
Harris, C. I. and Sheets, T. J. 1964. Influence of soil properties on adsorption and phytotoxicity of CIPC, diuron, and simazine. Weeds 12:215–219.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. and Singh, C. M. 1988. Control of Oxalis latifolia H. B. and K. under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Weed Sci. 20:32–38.Google Scholar
Looman, B. H. M. and Van Kuik, A. J. 1993. Chemical control of liverwort, moss, and weeds in container-grown nursery stock. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent. 58:837–843.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1963. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of foliar sprays of diuron. Weeds 11:265–269.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–227.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. R. and Pestemer, W. 1980. Plant availability and uptake of herbicides from soil. in Hance, R. J., ed. Interactions Between Herbicides and the Soil. New York: Academic. Pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
Simpson, C. V., Gilliam, C. H., Altland, J. E., Wehtje, G. R., and Sibley, J. L. 2002. Postemergence oxalis control in container-grown nursery crops. Proc. Southern Nurseryman Assoc. Res. Conf. 47:376–379.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Tan, S., and Sharma, S. D. 2002. Adjuvants enhance weed control efficacy of foliar-applied diuron. Weed Technol. 16:74–78.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. Jr and Appleby, A. P. 1972. A proposed method for diuron-induced phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 20:357–363.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1992. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6.03. Cary, NC. 1,082 p.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. T. 2002. Agricultural Chemicals, Book II: Herbicides. Fresno, CA: Thomson. 309 p.Google Scholar
Upchurch, R. P. 1958. The influence of soil factors on the phytotoxicity and plant selectivity of diuron. Weeds 6:161–171.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 493 p.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Gilliam, C. H., and Hajek, B. F. 1993. Adsorption, desorption, and leaching of oxadiazon in container media and soil. Hort. Sci. 28:126–128.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Gilliam, C. H., and Hajek, B. F. 1994. Adsorption, desorption, and leaching of oryzalin in container media and soil. Hort. Sci. 29:824.Google Scholar