Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:30:44.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of Arable Weed Populations along Eastern Arkansas–Mississippi Delta Roadsides: Factors Affecting Weed Occurrence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nicholas E. Korres ,
Jason K. Norsworthy ,
Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan  and
Andy Mauromoustakos
Nicholas E. Korres*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 W Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 W Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, TX 77843-2474
Andy Mauromoustakos
Affiliation:
Agricultural Statistics Laboratory, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The occurrence of 36 arable weed species across 13 counties in the eastern Arkansas–Mississippi Delta area on 489 randomly selected road sites was surveyed in 2012. Palmer amaranth, johnsongrass, large crabgrass, barnyardgrass, prickly sida, and broadleaf signalgrass were the top six weed species, with occurrence noted at 313, 294, 261, 238, 176, and 136 sites, respectively. Factors found to affect weed occurrence along Mississippi Delta roadsides included topographical characteristics, weed species, ditch slope, road type, and nearby land use. Among roadside topographical characteristics, road shoulder was found to strongly affect weed occurrence. In addition, paved and gravel road types with moderate roadside slope explained most of the variability of weed occurrence at each sampling site. Additionally, nearby arable land use affected weed occurrence more so than natural, residential, and pastoral land. Barnyardgrass, johnsongrass, and Palmer amaranth were 3.6 to 4.3 times more likely to occur than all other species identified. An effective weed management plan along eastern Arkansas–Mississippi Delta roadsides should focus on road shoulder, adjacent arable land use, road type, and specific weed species (e.g., Palmer amaranth, johnsongrass, and barnyardgrass). The inclusion of these parameters in future weed control programs can prove invaluable for preventing the spread of the herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth, barnyardgrass, and johnsongrass.

En 2012, se realizó un estudio observacional a lo largo de 13 condados en el este del área del Delta Arkansas-Mississippi en 489 sitios de carreteras, seleccionados aleatoriamente para evaluar la distribución de las malezas más comúnmente encontradas en áreas agrícolas arables. Entre las 36 especies detectadas, Amaranthus palmeri, Sorghum halepense, Digitaria sanguinalis, Sida spinosa, y Urochloa platyphylla fueron las seis especies de malezas más frecuentes encontrándose en 313, 294, 261, 238, 176, y 136 sitios, respectivamente. Echinochloa crus-galli, S. halepense, y A. Palmeri estuvieron presentes en 34, 32, y 31% de todas las condiciones de muestreo (sitio por característica topográfica de la carretera). Las preferencias de hábitat variaron entre las especies de malezas. A. palmeri, D. sanguinalis, y S. halepense exhibieron una preferencia por hábitats perturbados y los bordes de los campos. En cambio, E. crus-galli, Cyperus esculentus, Sesbania herbacea, y Ambrosia trifida exhibieron una preferencia por ambientes húmedos similares a los encontrados en los drenajes de las carreteras. El uso de herbicidas en los bordes de carreteras se encuentra bajo muchas regulaciones ambientales y preocupaciones del público que, en combinación con la evolución de resistencia a herbicidas, necesita un plan efectivo para el manejo de especies agronómicamente importantes en los bordes de carreteras en el este del área del Delta Arkansas-Mississippi.

Keywords

Barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.broadleaf signalgrass, Urochloa platyphylla (Nash) R.D. Websterjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.prickly sida, Sida spinosa L.Data filteringeastern Arkansasland useMississippi Deltanominal regressionroad typeroadsideroadside topographyweed distributionweed survey
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 596 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arkansas Highway Commission (2007) Arkansas State Highway Needs Study and Highway Improvement Plan. Arkansas Highway Commission. Pages 73 pGoogle Scholar
[AHTD] Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (2012) Road & Street Report Data Year 2012. Little Rock, AR: AHTD Google Scholar
Berger, RL, Cornett, PD, Demko, JS, Harper-Lore, B, Lisle, F, Markward, D, Tomlinson, CL, Willard, R, Artimovicg, N (2005) Integrated roadside vegetation management. A synthesis of highway practice. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board NCHRP Synthesis 341. 89 pGoogle Scholar
Birdsall, JL, McCaughey, W, Runyon, JB (2012) Roads impact the distribution of noxious weeds more than restoration treatments in a lodgepole pine forest in Montana, USA. Restoration Ecol 20:517–523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, CT, Hanks, JE (2006) Weed Populations in Conventional and Conservation Tillage Management Cotton and Soybean Systems. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University, Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station Research Rep. Vol. 23, No. 18. 6 pGoogle Scholar
Bukowski, CJ, Nowak, CA, Engelman, HM, Ballard, BD, Boley, JD (2005) Alternatives for Treating Roadside Right-of-Way Vegetation: Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography. Prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), Final Report, December 2005, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY. 87 pGoogle Scholar
Christen, D, Matlack, G (2006) The role of roadsides in plant invasions: a demographic approach. Conserv Biol 20:385–391 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christen, DC, Matlack, GR (2009) The habitat and conduit functions of roads in the spread of three invasive plant species. Biol Invasions 11:453–465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crall, A, Newman, G, Stohlgren, T, Jarnevich, C, Evangelista, P, Guenther, D (2006) Evaluating dominance as a component of non and native species invasions. Divers Distrib 12:195–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, BC, Holmstead, GL, Kerr, MJJ, Carpenter, LB (2003) Effects of road and transmission-line rights-of-way on botanical resources. Boise, Idaho: Idaho Power Company, Hells Canyon Complex Technical Rep. FERC 1971. 172 pGoogle Scholar
Eagle, AJ, Eiswerth, ME, Johnson, WE, Schoenig, SE, Van Kooten, GC (2007) Costs and losses imposed on California ranchers by yellow starthistle. Range Ecol Manag 60:369–377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Highway Administration (2010) Highway Statistics 2010. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2010/. Accessed July 8, 2014Google Scholar
Ferguson, L, Duncan, CL, Snodgrass, K (2003). Backcountry Road Maintenance and Weed Management. Missoula, MT: USDA Forest Service Technology and Development Program 2E22H65-Weed Theory, 7100 Engineering, July 2003, 0371–2811-MTDC. 23 pGoogle Scholar
Gelbard, JL, Belnap, J (2003) Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv Biol 17:420–443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, JM, Owen, MDK (2011) Herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J Agric Food Chem 59:5819–5829 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heap, I (2014) The international survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed September 14, 2014Google Scholar
Hill, K, Horner, R (2005) Assessment of Alternatives in Roadside Vegetation Management. Seattle, WA: Washington State Transportation Commission, Department of Transportation; Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Agreement T2695, Task 67. 131 pGoogle Scholar
Juneau, KJ, Tarasoff, CS (2013) The seasonality of survival and subsequent growth of common reed (Phragmites australis) rhizome fragments. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6:79–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korres, NE, Norsworthy, JK, Bagavathiannan, MV, Mauromoustakos, A (2015) Distribution of arable weed populations along eastern Arkansas Mississippi Delta roadsides: occurrence, distribution, and favored growth habitats. Weed Technol 29:587–595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korres, NE, Singh, A, Nizami, AS, Murphy, J (2011) Is grass biomethane a sustainable transport biofuel? Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 4:310–325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lousada, LL, Freitas, SP, Marciano, CR, Esteves, BS, Muniz, RA, Siqueira, DP (2013) Correlation of soil properties with weed occurrence in sugarcane areas. Planta Daninha 31:765–775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucey, A, Barton, S (2010) Public Perception and Sustainable Roadside Vegetation Management Strategies. Newark, Delaware, University of Delaware University Transportation Center, 1–15 Google Scholar
McNabb, C, Batterson, T (1991) Occurrence of the common reed Phragmites australis along roadsides in Lower Michigan. Mich Academician 23:211–220 Google Scholar
Osunsami S (2009) Killer Pigweeds Threaten Crops in the South. http://abcnews.go.com/WN/pig-weed-threatens-agriculture-industry-overtaking-fields-crops/story?id=8766404. Accessed October 15, 2014Google Scholar
Overton, JM, Smale, MC, Whaley, KJ, Fitzgerald, NB, McGlone, H (2002) A Methodology for Assessing the Biodiversity of Road Networks: A Case Study in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Transfund New Zealand Research Rep. 421. 1–80 pGoogle Scholar
Rankins, A Jr., Byrd, JD Jr., Mask, DB, Barnett, JW, Gerard, PD (2005) Survey of soybean weeds in Mississippi. Weed Technol 19:492–498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, KN, Norsworthy, JK (2010) Glyphosate resistant crop production systems: impact on weed species shifts. Pages 165–184 in Nandula, VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development and Management. Singapore: J. Wiley CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, LM, Ziemer, RR, Furniss, MJ (1994) What Do We Need To Know about Roads?. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/water/4Roads.htm. Accessed August 10, 2014Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Johnson, DB, Scott, RC, Bagavathiannan, M (2011) Glyphosate resistance in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype from Arkansas. Weed Sci 59:299–304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO, Bond, JA (2013a) Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in midsouthern United States cotton: a following-up survey. Weed Technol 27:778–787 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riar, DS, Norworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO, Eubank, TW, Scott, RC (2013b) Assessment of weed management practices and problem weeds in the midsouth United States—soybean: a consultant's perspective. Weed Technol 27:612–622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (2013) JMP® 11 Specialized Model. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. 226 pGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL (2000) The impact of glyphosate-resistant crops on the use of other herbicides and resistance management. Pest Manag Sci 56:320–326 3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spooner, PG, Lunt, ID, Briggs, SV (2004) Spatial analysis of anthropogenic disturbance regimes and roadside shrubs in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Appl Veget Sci 7:61–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, JJ, Williams, PA, Timmins, SM, Smale, MC (2009) Distribution and spread of environmental weeds along New Zealand roadsides. N Z J Ecol 33:190–204 Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture (2014) 2012 Census of Agriculture. Summary and State Data. Volume 1. Geographic Area Series. Part 51. AC-12-A-51. Washington, DC: USDA. 695 pGoogle Scholar