Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:10:28.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Weed Populations on the Semi-Arid Canadian Prairies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw ,
Francis O. Larney ,
C. Wayne Lindwall  and
Gerald C. Kozub
Robert E. Blackshaw
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Francis O. Larney
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
C. Wayne Lindwall
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Gerald C. Kozub
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A long-term study was conducted at Lethbridge, Alberta, to determine the response of weed populations to various crop rotations and tillage treatments. Weed density and species composition differed with rotation, tillage, and date of sampling within years. Fewer weeds were found in winter wheat-fallow than continuous winter wheat, winter wheat-lentil, or winter wheat-canola rotations. A dense infestation of downy brome developed in the continuous winter wheat rotation. In all rotations, more weeds were present in zero tillage plots than in either minimum or conventional tillage plots. Dandelion and perennial sowthistle densities increased slightly over years in the minimum and zero tillage treatments. Flixweed, field pennycress, wild buckwheat, and common lambsquarters densities decreased in zero till but densities of downy brome, redroot pigweed, and Russian thistle increased. Russian thistle was not well controlled with trifluralin and its density increased in the winter wheat-canola rotation.

Keywords

trifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenaminecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALdandelion, Taraxacum officinale Weber in Wiggers # TAROFdowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. # BROTEfield pennycress, Thlaspi arvense L. # THLARflixweed, Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb. ex Prantl # DESSOperennial sowthistle, Sonchus arvensis L. # SONARredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMARERussian thistle, Salsola iberica Sennen & Pau # SASKRwild buckwheat, Polygonum convolvulus L. # POLCOcanola, Brassica campestris L. ‘Tobin’lentil, Lens culinaris L. ‘Laird’winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Norstar.’Conservation tillagefallowweed densitiesLinum usitatissimumAMAREBROTECHEALDESSOKCHSCPOLCOSASKRSONARTHLAR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 231 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1984. Soil at Risk. Canada's Eroding Future. Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, ON. 129 p.Google Scholar
2. Ball, D. A. 1992. Weed seedbank response to tillage, herbicides, and crop rotation sequence. Weed Sci. 40:654–659.Google Scholar
3. Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1990. Weed seed population response to tillage and herbicide use in three irrigated cropping sequences. Weed Sci. 38:511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Brandt, S. A. 1992. Zero vs. conventional tillage and their effects on crop yield and soil moisture. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:679–688.Google Scholar
5. Buhler, D. D. 1992. Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage systems. Weed Sci. 40:241–248.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C. 1984. Requirements for agricultural chemicals in changing agricultural production systems—current state of the art. P. 49–71 in Irving, G. W., ed. Changing Agricultural Production Systems and the Fate of Agricultural Chemicals, Agric. Res. Inst., Chevy Chase.Google Scholar
7. Campbell, C. A., Zentner, R. P., Janzen, H. H., and Bowren, K. E. 1990. Crop Rotation Studies on the Canadian Prairies. Publ. 1841/E, Ottawa, ON. 131 p.Google Scholar
8. Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Harrison, K. 1991. Long-term tillage effects on seed banks in three Ohio soils. Weed Sci. 39:186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Cavers, P. B. and Benoit, D. L. 1989. Seed banks in arable land. P. 309–328 in Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T., and Simpson, R. L., eds. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
10. Chancellor, R. J. 1979. The long-term effects of herbicides on weed populations. Ann. Appl. Biol. 91:141–144.Google Scholar
11. Crookston, R. K., Kurle, J. E., Copeland, P. J., Ford, J. H., and Lueschen, W. E. 1991. Rotational cropping sequence affects yield of corn and soybean. Agron. J. 83:108–113.Google Scholar
12. Dao, T. H. 1987. Crop residues and management of annual grass weeds in continuous no-till wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 35:395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Dwyer, D. D. and Wolde-Yohannis, K. 1972. Germination, emergence, water use and production of Russian thistle. Agron. J. 64:52–55.Google Scholar
14. Fay, P. K. 1990. A brief overview of the biology and distribution of weeds of wheat. P. 33–50 in Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America, Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
15. Foster, R. K. 1984. The effect of various conservation cropping practices on wheat. P. 68–77 in Annual Report of CDC and Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.Google Scholar
16. Froud-Williams, R. J. 1988. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. P. 213–236 in Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
17. Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, D. S. H. 1981. Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regions. Weed Res. 21:99–109.Google Scholar
18. Froud-Williams, R. J., Drennan, D. S. H., and Chancellor, R. J. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:187–197.Google Scholar
19. Haas, H. and Streiberg, J. C. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. P. 57–79 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide resistance in plants. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
20. Holm, F. A. 1988. Herbicides for conservation tillage. Proc. 35th Annu. Meeting Canadian Pest Manage. Soc., Calgary, AB. pp. 76–98.Google Scholar
21. Hume, L. 1982. The long-term effects of fertilizer application and three rotations on weed communities in wheat (after 21–22 years at Indian Head, Saskatchewan). Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:741–750.Google Scholar
22. Hume, L. 1988. Long-term effects of 2,4-D application on plants. II. Herbicide avoidance by Chenopodium album and Thlaspi arvense . Can. J. Bot. 66:230–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Hume, L., Tessier, S., and Dyck, F. B. 1991. Tillage and rotation influences on weed community composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in southwestern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:783–789.Google Scholar
24. Koskinen, W. C. and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41:365–370.Google Scholar
25. Lafond, G., Brandt, S., McAndrew, D., Stobbe, E., and Tessier, S. 1990. Tillage systems and crop production. P. 155–201 in Lafond, G. P. and Fowler, D. B., eds. Crop Management for Conservation. Proc. of the Soil Conservation Symposium, Yorkton, SK.Google Scholar
26. Larney, F. J., Lindwall, C. W., Izaurralde, R. C., and Moulin, A. P. 1994. Tillage systems for soil and water conservation on the Canadian prairies. P. 305–328 in Carter, M. R., ed. Conservation Tillage in Temperate Regions, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.Google Scholar
27. Maguire, J. D. and Overland, A. 1959. Laboratory germination of seeds of weedy and native plants. Cir. 349, Washington Agric. Exp. Stn., Pullman, WA. p. 15.Google Scholar
28. Massee, T. W. 1976. Downy brome control in dryland winter wheat with stubble-mulch fallow and seeding management. Agron. J. 68:952–955.Google Scholar
29. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1985. Weed spectrum change and control in reduced-till wheat. North Dakota Farm Res. 43:11–14.Google Scholar
30. Moyer, J. R., Roman, E. S., Lindwall, C. W., and Blackshaw, R. E. 1994. Weed management in conservation tillage systems for wheat production in North and South America. Crop Protect. (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Roberts, H. A. and Neilson, J. E. 1981. Changes in the soil seed bank of four long-term crop/herbicide experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 18:661–668.Google Scholar
32. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. P. 19–390 in Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
33. Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657–663.Google Scholar
34. Taylorson, R. B. and Hendricks, S. B. 1971. Changes in phytochrome expressed by germination of Amaranthus retroflexus L. seeds. Plant Physiol. 47:619–622.Google Scholar
35. Teasdale, J. R., Beste, C. E., and Potts, W. E. 1991. Response of weeds to tillage and cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 39:195–199.Google Scholar
36. Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. R. 1989. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) yields and weed populations in conventional and reduced tillage systems. Weed Technol. 3:590–595.Google Scholar
37. Weaver, S. E. and McWilliams, E. L. 1990. The biology of Canadian weeds. 44. Amaranthus retroflexus L., A. powellii S. Wats, and A. hybridus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:1215–1234.Google Scholar
38. Wiese, A. F., ed. 1985. Weed Control in Limited-Tillage Systems. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Mongr. No. 2. Champaign, IL 297 p.Google Scholar
39. Zentner, R. P., Brandt, S. A., Kirkland, K. J., Campbell, C. A., and Sonntag, G. J. 1994. Economies of rotation and tillage systems for the dark brown soil zone of the Canadian prairies. Soil and Tillage Res. (In press).Google Scholar