Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:22:47.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) with Imazethapyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Clarence J. Swanton  and
Kevin Chandler
Clarence J. Swanton
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Kevin Chandler
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several weedy biotypes of wild-proso millet occur throughout Ontario. Field and laboratory studies were conducted in 1986 and 1987 to evaluate imazethapyr for preemergence and postemergence control of wild-proso millet. In the laboratory, imazethapyr, applied postemergence, effectively controlled weedy biotypes of wild-proso millet in the 4- to 5-leaf stage. Seedlings of black-seeded wild-proso millet were controlled at the 1- to 5-leaf stage by 50 g ai/ha of imazethapyr. Higher doses of imazethapyr were required to control later growth stages. In field studies, imazethapyr, applied preemergence or postemergence, effectively controlled black-seeded wild-proso millet, resulting in soybean yields comparable to the recommended postemergence treatment of sethoxydim.

Keywords

Imazethapyr, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid: sethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one, wild-proso millet, Panicum miliaceum L. ♯3 PANMIsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Maple Arrow’Imidazolinonebiotypesgrowth stagesoybean
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 446 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1988. Guide to weed control. Ont. Ministry of Agriculture and Food Publ. 75.Google Scholar
2. Bough, M. A., and Cavers, P. B. 1987. Proso millet. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Factsheet, Order No. 87-025.Google Scholar
3. Bough, M., Colosi, J. C., and Cavers, P. B. 1986. The major weedy biotypes of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in Canada. Can. J. Bot. 64:1188–1198.Google Scholar
4. Cavers, P. B., and Bough, M. A. 1985. Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.): A crop and a weed. p. 143–145 in While, J., ed. Studies on plant demography: a festschrift for John L. Harper. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
5. Colosi, J. C., Cavers, P. B., and Bough, M. A. 1988. Dormancy and survival in buried seeds of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Can. J. Bot. 66:101–168.Google Scholar
6. O'Toole, J. J. 1982. Seed banks of Panicum miliaceum L. in three crops. M.Sc. thesis. Univ. West. Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
7. O'Toole, J. J., and Cavers, P. B. 1983. Input to seed banks of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in southern Ontario. Can J. Plant Sci. 62:1023–1030.Google Scholar
8. Peoples, T. R., Wang, T., Fine, R. R., Orwick, P. L., Graham, S. E., and Kirkland, K. 1985. AC 263,499: A new broadspectrum herbicide for use in soybeans and other legumes. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. – Weeds, p. 99–105.Google Scholar
9. Pillmoor, J. B., and Caseley, J. C. 1984. The influence of growth stage and foliage or soil application on the activity of AC 222,293 against Alopecurus myosuroides and Avena fatua . Ann. Appl. Biol. 105:517–527.Google Scholar
10. Warwick, S. I. 1987. Isozyme variation in proso millet. J. Hered. 78:210–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar