Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:48:27.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Volunteer Potato (Solanum tuberosum) in Sweet Corn with Mesotrione Is Unaffected by Atrazine and Tillage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rick A. Boydston ,
Harold P. Collins  and
Ashok K. Alva
Rick A. Boydston*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA, 99350-9687
Harold P. Collins
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA, 99350-9687
Ashok K. Alva
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA, 99350-9687
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Volunteer potato is a major weed pest of sweet corn in regions where winter soil temperatures fail to kill tubers left in the ground after harvest. Studies were conducted in 2004 to 2005 to determine the effect of combining atrazine with mesotrione applied POST on volunteer potato control and new tuber production in sweet corn. Mesotrione at 0.035, 0.07, and 0.1 kg/ha and atrazine at 0.3, 0.6, and 1.1 kg/ha were applied alone and in all possible combinations when volunteer potato ranged from 5 to 12 cm tall. Mesotrione applied alone at all rates, atrazine at 1.1 kg/ha, or mesotrione plus atrazine combinations reduced the number of new tubers produced to ≤ 1.1 per plant compared with 11 tubers per plant in nontreated checks. Potatoes treated with atrazine alone at 0.3 or 0.6 kg/ha produced 3.3 or 1.9 tubers per plant, respectively, which could lead to volunteer potato problems in the succeeding crop. Sweet corn yield was not affected by herbicide treatment in 2004 but was reduced in 2005 when atrazine was used alone at 0.3 or 0.6 kg/ha because of poor control of volunteer potato. Additional studies were conducted from 2004 to 2006 to determine volunteer potato control in sweet corn in reduced and conventional tillage and treated with fluroxypyr, mesotrione, or no herbicide. Volunteer potato control was improved and the number and weight of tubers was reduced 79 and 91%, respectively, in conventionally tilled plots treated with fluroxypyr compared with reduced-tillage plots. Control of volunteer potato with mesotrione was greater than 98% and reduced tuber number and weight greater than or equal to all other treatments regardless of tillage level.

Keywords

Atrazinefluroxypyrmesotrionepotato, Solanum tuberosum L., sweet corn, Zea mays L.Cultivationgroundkeepersherbicidestillage levelweed management
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 654 - 659
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abendroth, J. A., Martin, A. R., and Roeth, F. W. 2006. Plant response to combinations of mesotrione and photosystem II inhibitors. Weed Technol 20:267–274.Google Scholar
Armel, G. R., Hall, G. J., Wilson, H. P., and Cullen, N. 2005. Mesotrione plus atrazine mixtures for control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci 53:202–211.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. 2001. Volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) control with herbicides and cultivation in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 15:461–466.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. 2004. Managing volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) in field corn (Zea mays) with carfentrazone-ethyl and dicamba. Weed Technol 18:83–87.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A., Seymour, M. D., Brown, C. R., and Alva, A. K. 2006. Freezing behavior of potato (Solanum tuberosum), cultivar ‘Russet Burbank’ tubers in soil. Am. J. Potato Res 83:305–315.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Williams, M. M. II. 2005. Managing volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) in field corn with mesotrione and arthropod herbivory. Weed Technol 19:443–450.Google Scholar
Hugie, J. A., Riechers, D. E., and Tranel, P. J. 2004. Activity of photosystem II inhibitors in combination with mesotrione on triazine-resistant and sensitive Amaranthus spp. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 59:88.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. C., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2002. Effect of postemergence application rate and timing of mesotrione on corn (Zea mays) response and weed control. Weed Technol 16:414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., Zandstra, J., and Sikkema, P. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to mesotrione. Weed Technol 16:421–425.Google Scholar
Williams, M. M. II and Boydston, R. A. 2002. Effect of shoot removal during tuberization on volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber production. Weed Technol 16:617–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Boydston, R. A., and Davis, A. S. 2007. Crop competitive ability contributes to herbicide performance in sweet corn. Weed Res 48:58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Pataky, J. K., Nordby, J. N., Riechers, D. E., Sprague, C. L., and Masiunas, J. B. 2005. Cross-sensitivity in sweet corn to nicosulfuron and mesotrione applied postemergence. Hortscience 40:1801–1805.Google Scholar