Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:26:48.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Ragweed Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) and Associated Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Samunder Singh ,
Ashok Yadav ,
Rajender S. Balyan ,
Ram K. Malik  and
Megh Singh
Samunder Singh*
Affiliation:
Weed Control, Agronomy Department, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India
Ashok Yadav
Affiliation:
Weed Control, Agronomy Department, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India
Rajender S. Balyan
Affiliation:
Weed Science, Agronomy Department, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India
Ram K. Malik
Affiliation:
Weed Science, Agronomy Department, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India
Megh Singh
Affiliation:
Weed Science, University of Florida–IFAS, Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL 33850
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate control of 90- to 100-cm-tall ragweed parthenium in a noncropped situation in Haryana State, India, during 2000 and 2001. Atrazine, 2,4-D ethyl ester, atrazine plus 2,4-D, metribuzin, metsulfuron, chlorimuron, glufosinate with and without surfactant, glyphosate with and without surfactant, and glyphosate formulations MON 8793 and 8794 were sprayed on ragweed parthenium. Also, the effect of water quality was studied with flat-fan and flood-fan nozzles using glyphosate and its formulation MON 8793 against ragweed parthenium and associated weeds. Glyphosate MON 8793 and 8794 at 3.6 kg ae/ha provided excellent control of ragweed parthenium followed by glyphosate at 2.7 or 5.4 kg/ha, with no recovery until 18 wk after treatment (WAT). Addition of 0.1% v/v surfactant (MON 0818) to glyphosate at 2.7 kg/ha provided similar control to that of glyphosate alone at 5.4 kg/ha. Other herbicides failed to provide satisfactory control of ragweed parthenium. In the water quality study, glyphosate at 2.7 and 5.4 kg/ha and glyphosate MON 8793 at 2.7 and 3.6 kg/ha provided similar control of ragweed parthenium at 18 WAT. Glyphosate was antagonized less by tap water (0.45 mM Ca) than canal (0.7 mM Ca) and hand-pump water (1 mM Ca). Neither glyphosate nor glyphosate MON 8793 provided good control of purple nutsedge, velvetleaf, garden spurge, threelobe false mallow, jimsonweed, giant milkweed, Indian jujube, or tropical spiderwort, but crowfootgrass, green foxtail, sprawling signalgrass, and spiny amaranth were controlled. Glyphosate at 5.4 kg/ha and glyphosate MON 8793 at 3.6 kg/ha provided more than 80% control of bermudagrass at 8 WAT, which was significantly better than the 2.7 kg/ha rate. Flat-fan nozzles provided better efficacy of applied herbicides than flood-fan nozzles at 4 WAT on ragweed parthenium.

Keywords

Atrazinechlorimuron-ethylglufosinateglyphosateglyphosate MON 8793glyphosate MON 8794metribuzinmetsulfuron-methyl2,4-Dragweed parthenium, Parthenium hysterophorus L. # PTNHYbermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. # CYNDAcrowfootgrass, Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Beauv. # DTTAEgarden spurge, Euphorbia hirta L. # EPHHIgiant milkweed, Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br.green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVIIndian jujube, Zizyphus nummularia (Burm. f.) Wight. & Arn.jimsonweed, Datura stramonium L. # DATSTpurple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L. # CYPROspiny amaranth, Amaranthus spinosus L. # AMASPthreelobe false mallow, Malvastrum coromandelianum (L.) Garcke.velvetleaf, Abutilon bidentatum L.Application stageglyphosate formulationsnozzle typessurfactantwater qualityDAT, days after treatmentWAT, weeks after treatmentEC, electrical conductivity
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 658 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aneja, K. R., Dhawan, S. R., and Sharma, A. B. 1991. Deadly weed, Parthenium hysterophorus L.—and its distribution. Ind. J. Weed Sci 23:14–18.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001. Annual Report, All India Coordinated Research Project. New Delhi, India: CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar Center, Indian Council of Agricultural Research. 76 p.Google Scholar
Balyan, R. S., Yadav, A., and Malik, R. K. 1998. Efficacy of herbicides and carrier volumes on the carrot weed (Parthenium hysterophorus Linn). in McMullan, P., ed. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. Challenges and Opportunities; Memphis, Tennessee: International Society on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. 1:182–186.Google Scholar
Balyan, R. S., Yadav, A., Malik, R. K., and Pahwa, S. K. 1996. Chemical control of Parthenium hysterophorus . Pestology 14:12–14.Google Scholar
Bradley, P. R., Johnson, W. G., and Smeda, R. J. 2000. Response of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to atrazine, ammonium sulfate, and glyphosate. Weed Technol. 14:15–18.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate toxicity. Weed Sci. 31:163–169.Google Scholar
Chippendale, J. F. and Panetta, F. D. 1994. The cost of parthenium weed to the Queensland cattle industry. Plant Prot. Quart 9:73–76.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, H., Uffing, A. J. M., and Meinen, E. 1996. Influence of surfactants and ammonium sulfate on glyphosate phytotoxicity to quackgrass (Elytrigia repens). Weed Technol. 10:803–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, B. L. and du Toit, D. 1993. Chemical composition of carrier water influences glyphosate efficacy. South Afr. J. Plant Soil 10:178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhawan, S. R. and Dhawan, P. 1994. Congress grass: effect of temperature and light on seed germination. Adv. Plant Sci 7:177–178.Google Scholar
Dhawan, S. R. and Dhawan, P. 1996. Regeneration in Parthenium hysterophorus L. World Weeds 3:181–182.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K. 2001. Effectiveness of introduced biocontrol insects on the weed Parthenium hysterophorus (Asteraceae) in Australia. Bull. Entomol. Res 91:167–176.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. E., Hart, W. E., Hayes, R. M., and Mueller, T. C. 2001. Effect of venturi-type nozzles and application volume on postemergence herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol. 15:75–80.Google Scholar
Feng, P. C. C., Chiu, T., Sammons, R. D., and Ryerse, J. S. 2003. Droplet size affects glyphosate retention, absorption, and translocation in corn. Weed Sci. 51:443–448.Google Scholar
Kadhane, D. L., Jangde, C. R., Sadekar, R. D., and Joshirao, M. K. 1992. Parthenium toxicity in buffalo calves. J. Soil Crops 2:69–71.Google Scholar
Kudsk, P. and Mathiassen, S. K. 1993. Water quality and herbicide efficacy. in Proceedings of the 10th Danish Plant Protection conference, S2236 Danish Plant Protection Society. Pp. 131–139.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. and Bhan, V. M. 1998. Establishment and dispersal of introduced exotic parthenium controlling bioagent Zygogramma bicolorata in relation to ecological factors at Vindhyanagar. Ind. J. Ecol 25:8–13.Google Scholar
Lundegardh, B. 1994. Pure water in the sprayer—a way to more effective weed control. Vaxtskvddsnotiser 58:97–101.Google Scholar
Mahadevappa, M., Das, T. K., and Kumar, A. 2001. Parthenium: a curse for natural herbs. in Proceeding of the National Research Seminar on Herbal Conservation, Culture, Marketing and Utilization with Special Emphasis on Chhatisgarh—‘The Herbal State’; Raipur, India; December 13– 14, 2001. Chhatisgarh, India: Srishti Herbal Academy and Research Institute. 13 p.Google Scholar
Mishra, J. S. and Bhan, V. M. 1995. Efficacy of sulfonylurea herbicides against Parthenium hysterophorus L. Ind. J. Weed Sci 27:45–48.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C. and Womac, A. R. 1997. Effect of formulation and nozzle type on droplet size with isopropylamine and trimesium salts of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:639–643.Google Scholar
Muniappa, T. V., Prasad, T. V. R., and Krishnamurthy, K. 1980. Comparative efficacy and economics of mechanical and chemical methods of control of Parthenium hysterophorus Linn. Ind. J. Weed Sci 12:137–144.Google Scholar
Navie, S. C., Panetta, F. D., McFadyen, R. E., and Adkins, S. W. 1998. Behaviour of buried and surface-sown seeds of Parthenium hysterophorus . Weed Res 38:335–341.Google Scholar
Pandey, D. K., Palni, I. M. S., and Joshi, S. C. 2003. Growth, reproduction, and photosynthesis of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus). Weed Sci. 51:191–201.Google Scholar
Paradkar, N. R., Kurchania, S. P., and Tiwari, J. P. 1997. Chemical control of Parthenium hysterophorus L. and other associated weed in upland drilled rice. Ind. J. Weed Sci 29:151–154.Google Scholar
Parker, A. 1990. Biological control of Parthenium weed using two rust fungi. in Proceeding of the VIII International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds. Rome, Italy: Instituto Sperimentale per la Patologia Vegetale. Pp. 531–537.Google Scholar
Rajendrudu, G. and Das, V. S. R. 1990. C3-like carbon isotope discrimination in C3-C4 intermediate Alternanthera and Parthenium species. Curr. Sci 59:377–379.Google Scholar
Rao, R. S. 1956. Parthenium hysterophorus Linn.—a new record for India. J. Bombay Nat. His. Soc 54:218–220.Google Scholar
Ramos, H. H. and Durigan, J. C. 1998. Effect of spraying water quality on the efficiency of post-emergence herbicides. Bragantia 57:313–324.Google Scholar
Roxburgh, W. 1914. Hortus Bengalensis. Calcutta, India: Mission. 105 p.Google Scholar
Satchivi, N. M., Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Briskin, D. P. 2000. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate isopropylamine and trimethylsulfonium salts in Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi . Weed Sci. 48:675–679.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Phillips, W. M. 1979. Effects of water quality and spray volume on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 27:38–41.Google Scholar
Tamado, T., Schutz, W., and Milberg, P. 2002. Germination ecology of the weed Parthenium hysterophorus in eastern Ethiopia. Ann. Appl. Biol 140:263–270.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. D., Jackson, E. P., and Penner, D. 1995. The basis for the hard water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 43:541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, J. P., Kurchania, S. P., Bhalla, C. S., and Paradkar, N. R. 1998. Studies on allelopathic effects of Cassia tora in Parthenium hysterophorus . Ind. J. Weed Sci 30:204–205.Google Scholar
Walia, U. S., Brar, L. S., Jand, S., and Kler, D. S. 2002. Control of Sorghum halepense and Parthenium hysterophorus with different brands of glyphosate. Environ. Ecol 20:540–543.Google Scholar
Whitwell, T. and Santelmann, P. W. 1978. Influence of growth stage and soil conditions on bermudagrass susceptibility to glyphosate. Agron. J 70:653–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, A., Malik, R. K., and Balyan, R. S. 1997. Evaluation of herbicides against carrot weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L). Pestology 21:38–42.Google Scholar