Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:40:31.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) and Field Mint (Mentha arvensis) with Glyphosate Applied Preharvest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jerry A. Ivany  and
Douglas J. Doohan
Jerry A. Ivany
Affiliation:
Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada C1A 7M8
Douglas J. Doohan
Affiliation:
Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Marketing, Truro, NS, Canada B2N 5E3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments showed that quackgrass could be controlled by glyphosate applied preharvest to barley. In separate experiments, field mint was controlled by glyphosate applied pre- and postharvest to barley and wheat. Suppression of quackgrass regrowth one year following treatment was 90% or greater when glyphosate was applied at 0.9 kg ai/ha alone or at 0.45 kg ai/ha in combination with both tallow amine ethoxylate at 0.5% of total spray volume and ammonium sulfate at 3 kg/ha. Field mint shoot counts were reduced 84% the year following treatment when glyphosate was applied at 0.25 kg ai/ha and 95% when applied at 1.0 kg ai/ha. Suppression of field mint shoot regrowth the following year was 84% when glyphosate was applied postharvest and 93% when applied preharvest. Addition of tallow amine ethoxylate did not improve field mint control. Glyphosate applied preharvest to barley and wheat at less than 30% grain moisture content had no effect on grain yield.

Keywords

barley, Hordeum vulgare L.field mint, Mentha arvensis L. MENARGlyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl) glycinequackgrass, Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski, # AGRREwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Spike countshoot countAGRREMENAR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 744 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ivany, J. A. 1981. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with fall-applied glyphosate and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 29:382–386.Google Scholar
Ivany, J. A. 1986. Quackgrass competition effect on potato yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:185–187.Google Scholar
Ivany, J. A. 1988. Control of quackgrass with glyphosate and additives. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:1095–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivany, J. A. 1991. Mentha arvensis control with amino triazole and glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:561–563.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B., Armstrong, C., Black, M., and Chapman, J. 1980. Physiological aspects of sprouting and spoilage in developing Triticum aestivum L. (wheat) grains. In Seed Production. London: Butterworths. pp. 339–356.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, M. G. 1980. The control of Agropyron repens and broad-leaved weeds preharvest of wheat and barley with the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Council 15:53–60.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G. and Ivany, J. A. 1990. The weed flora of Prince Edward Island cereal fields. Weed Sci. 38:119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar