Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:32:42.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in Winter Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Aaron J. Hoskins ,
Bryan G. Young ,
Ronald F. Krausz  and
John S. Russin
Aaron J. Hoskins
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Center for Excellence in Soybean Research, Teaching, and Outreach, Southern Illinois University, 1205 Lincoln Drive, MC-4415, Carbondale, IL 62901
Bryan G. Young*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Center for Excellence in Soybean Research, Teaching, and Outreach, Southern Illinois University, 1205 Lincoln Drive, MC-4415, Carbondale, IL 62901
Ronald F. Krausz
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Center for Excellence in Soybean Research, Teaching, and Outreach, Southern Illinois University, 1205 Lincoln Drive, MC-4415, Carbondale, IL 62901
John S. Russin
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Center for Excellence in Soybean Research, Teaching, and Outreach, Southern Illinois University, 1205 Lincoln Drive, MC-4415, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were established in 1999 and 2000 to evaluate Italian ryegrass, wheat, and double-crop soybean response to fall and spring postemergence applications of flucarbazone, sulfosulfuron, clodinafop, diclofop, and tralkoxydim applied alone and in combination with thifensulfuron + tribenuron to winter wheat. Fall-applied herbicides caused 5% or less wheat injury. Spring-applied herbicides caused 3 to 45% wheat injury, and the greatest injury occurred with the combination of flucarbazone with thifensulfuron + tribenuron in the spring of 2001. Spring-applied sulfosulfuron, tralkoxydim, diclofop, and clodinafop caused 3 to 6% and 16 to 26% wheat injury in 2000 and 2001, respectively. Herbicide injury to wheat did not reduce wheat grain yield compared with the hand-weeded treatment. Italian ryegrass competition in the nontreated plots reduced wheat yield by as much as 33% compared with herbicide-treated plots. Italian ryegrass control was 89 to 99% from clodinafop and diclofop and 78 to 97% from flucarbazone, with no differences because of application timing in either year of the study. Italian ryegrass control from sulfosulfuron and tralkoxydim was greater from the spring of 2000 applications (94 to 99%) compared with the fall of 1999 applications (65 to 88%). However, in 2001, application timing (fall vs. spring) for sulfosulfuron and tralkoxydim did not affect Italian ryegrass control. Thifensulfuron + tribenuron combined with tralkoxydim reduced control of Italian ryegrass control compared with tralkoxydim alone in both years of the study. Italian ryegrass control was not reduced when thifensulfuron + tribenuron was combined with sulfosulfuron, flucarbazone, diclofop, or clodinafop. Italian ryegrass was controlled effectively by the acetyl-CoA carboxylase–inhibiting herbicides diclofop, clodinafop, and tralkoxydim. However, control of Italian ryegrass with the acetolactate synthase–inhibiting herbicides flucarbazone and sulfosulfuron was inconsistent. Double-crop soybean after wheat did not have foliar symptoms or yield loss from fall- or spring-applied herbicides.

Keywords

ClodinafopdiclofopflucarbazonesulfosulfuronthifensulfurontralkoxydimtribenuronItalian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum Lam., Marshall # LOLMUsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr, ‘BT369CR’wheat, Triticum aestivum L., ‘Pioneer 25R26’Application timingherbicide carryovertank mixturesALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18)DAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 261 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Appleby, A. P., Olson, P. D., and Colbert, D. R. 1976. Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron. J. 68:463–466.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Kelley, J. P., and Peeper, T. F. 1999. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in wheat with MKH 6562 and other new herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:62.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hays, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas, Chapter 3. in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel Dekker. Pp. 117–189.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Hamman, W. M. 1998. Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with MON 37500. Weed Technol. 12:421–425.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L., Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Factors influencing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) injury from sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:724–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., Northam, F. E., Miller, S. D., and Hageman, N. R. 1998. MON 37500 rate and timing affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 46:366–373.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., Peterson, D. E., and Miller, S. D. 2002. Application timing affects BAY MKH 6561 and MON 37500 efficacy and crop response in winter wheat. Weed Technol. 16:800–806.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. 1986. Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 34:98–100.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G. and Sprague, C. L. 2002. Weed control for small grains, pastures, and forages. in 2003 Illinois Agricultural Pest Management Handbook. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Extension. Pp. 115–131.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and Blackshaw, R. E. 1991. Influence of growth stage and broadleaf herbicides on tralkoxydim activity. Weed Sci. 39:650–659.Google Scholar
Howatt, K. A., Roach, R. F., and Davidson-Harrington, J. D. 2001. Grass control with MKH 6562 tank-mixes. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 58:63.Google Scholar
Khodayari, K., Frans, R. E., and Collins, F. C. 1983. Diclofop-a selective herbicide for Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 31:436–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. 1954. Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Feekes scale. Plant Pathol. 3:128–129.Google Scholar
Liebel, R. and Worsham, A. D. 1987a. Effect of chlorsulfuron on diclofop phytotoxicity to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 35:383–387.Google Scholar
Liebel, R. and Worsham, A. D. 1987b. Interference of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 35:819–823.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. E. and Regehr, D. L. 2000. Recrop evaluation following MON-37500 and MKH-6561. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 57:38.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. E. and Regehr, D. L. 2001. Cheat, rye, and imidazolinone resistant wheat response to imazamox. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 58:67–68.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Scott, R. C. and French, N. M. 1999. Italian ryegrass and winter annual broadleaf weed control with Prowl herbicide in wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:61.Google Scholar
Shinn, S. L., Thill, D. C., Price, W. J., and Ball, D. A. 1998. Response of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and rotational crops to MON 37500. Weed Technol. 12:690–698.Google Scholar
Simpson, D. M. and Stoller, E. W. 1996. Physiological mechanisms in the synergism between thifensulfuron and imazethapyr in sulfonylurea-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 44:209–214.Google Scholar