Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:27:13.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Postemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William A. Bailey  and
Henry P. Wilson
William A. Bailey
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech, Painter, VA 23420
Henry P. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Tech, Painter, VA 23420
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Virginia in 2000 and 2001 to determine the response of wheat and Italian ryegrass biotypes to postemergence applications of diclofop-methyl compared with several experimental and registered herbicides. Control of diclofop-methyl–sensitive Italian ryegrass by AE F130060 03 was similar to control by diclofop-methyl and was greater than that by chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron, chlorsulfuron plus metribuzin, MON 37560, ICIA 0604, and CGA 184927. AE F130060 03 also controlled diclofop-methyl–resistant Italian ryegrass better than the other herbicides. Late-season spike density of diclofop-methyl–resistant Italian ryegrass was reduced 91 to 98% by AE F130060 03. Despite injury ranging from 10 to 24%, grain yield from wheat treated with AE F130060 03 was similar to or greater than yield from wheat treated with the other herbicides. Italian ryegrass control, spike density, and grain yield were not influenced by AE F130060 03 rate or addition of methylated seed oil.

Keywords

chlorsulfurondiclofop-methylmetribuzinmetsulfuronItalian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum Lam. # LOLMUDiclofop-methyl resistanceresistance managementACCase, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.2)ALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18)MSO, methylated seed oilPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceWAT, weeks after treatmentWBT, weeks before treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 534 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: University of Kentucky Research and Education Center, 1205 Hopkinsville Street, Princeton, KY 42445.

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, M., Bertges, W., Hicks, C., Luff, K., Hoobler, M., Maruska, D., Paulsgrove, M., and Thorsness, K. 2002. The use of AE F130060 herbicide for grass control in wheat. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 42: 76.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001a. Achieve product label. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Protection.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001b. Discover product label. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Protection.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001c. Finesse product label. Wilmington, DE: DuPont Agricultural Products.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001d. Maverick product label. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto Company.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002a. Published Estimates Database for Winter Wheat. National Agricultural Statistics Service: Web page: http://www.nass.usda.gov. Accessed: June 1, 2002.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002b. Mesomaxx Technical Bulletin. Lyon, France: Aventis CropScience S.A. 28 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002c. Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium Technical Bulletin. Lyon, France: Aventis CropScience S.A. 32 p.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P. and Brewster, B. D. 1995. Seeding arrangement on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield and interaction with Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Technol. 6: 820–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, A. P., Olsen, P. O., and Colbert, D. R. 1976. Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron. J. 68: 463–466.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Shaw, D. R., and Street, J. E. 2000. Graminicide application timing influences red rice (Oryza sativa) control and seedhead reduction in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14: 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2001. Fluthiamid plus metribuzin and chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron control Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54: 34.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2002. Mesosulfuron/iodosulfuron (AE F130060) for Italian ryegrass control in VA wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55: 21–22.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A., Klepper, B., and Rydrych, D. J. 1995. Comparative above-ground developmental rates for several annual grass weeds and cereal grains. Weed Sci. 43: 410–416.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1996. Growth stage and broadleaf herbicide effects on CGA 184927 efficacy. Weed Technol. 10: 732–737.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L., Kenkel, N. C., and Morrison, I. N. 1997. Characterization of cross-resistance patterns in acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor resistant wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 45: 750–755.Google Scholar
Bravin, F., Zanin, G., and Preston, C. 2001. Diclofop-methyl resistance in biotypes of Lolium spp. from central Italy. Weed Res. 41: 49–58.Google Scholar
Brewster, B. D., Gamroth, D. M., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1997. Italian ryegrass control in winter wheat in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 91.Google Scholar
Burrill, L. C. and Appleby, A. P. 1978. Influence of Italian ryegrass density on efficacy of diuron herbicide. Agron. J. 70: 505–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocker, K. M., Northcroft, D. S., Coleman, J. O. D., and Moss, S. R. 2001. Resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides and isoproturon in UK biotypes of Lolium multiflorum: mechanisms of resistance and implications for control. Pest. Manag. Sci. 57: 587–597.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L. and York, A. C. 2002. Italian ryegrass control in wheat with mesosulfuron-methyl. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55: 22–23.Google Scholar
Driver, J. E., Kidder, D. W., and James, J. R. 1999. Clodinafop-propargyl: a new selective herbicide for grass control in wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52: 184–185.Google Scholar
Frans, R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. In Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. 1985. Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 34: 98–100.Google Scholar
Hand, S. S., Smith, T. L., Sanderson, J., Barr, G., Strachan, F., and Paulsgrove, M. 2002. AE F130060—a new selective herbicide for grass control in wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55: 142–143.Google Scholar
Hashem, A., Radosevich, S. R., and Roush, M. L. 1998. Effect of proximity factors on competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 46: 181–190.Google Scholar
Hopkins, W. L. 1997. Safeners and plant growth regulators. In Global Herbicide Directory. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Ag Chem Information Services. 26 p.Google Scholar
Ketchersid, M. L. and Bridges, D. C. 1987. Factors affecting the toxicity of flurtamone to sorghum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40: 343.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. J., Johnson, E. N., and Stevenson, F. C. 2001. Control of wild oat (Avena fatua) in wheat with MKH 6562. Weed Technol. 15: 48–55.Google Scholar
Klingaman, T. E. and Peeper, T. F. 1989. Weed control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with chlorsulfuron and CGA 131036 and comparison of modes of action. Weed Technol. 3: 490–496.Google Scholar
Kocher, H. 1984. Wild oat symposium: mode of action of the wild oat herbicide diclofop-methyl-methyl. 12th Can. Plains Proc. 2: 63–77.Google Scholar
Kuchuran, M. and Beckie, H. J. 2000. Cross-resistance pattern in biotypes of ACCase inhibitor-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 40: 32.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1984. Annual ryegrass interference in wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37: 310.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1987. Effect of chlorsulfuron on diclofop-methyl phytotoxicity to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 35: 383–387.Google Scholar
Perez-Fernandez, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1998. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) response to residual phosphorus levels in winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 244.Google Scholar
Rauch, T. A. and Thill, D. C. 1999. Italian ryegrass control and winter wheat response with fluthiamid/metribuzin. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 186.Google Scholar
Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron: inhibition of valine and isoleucine synthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75: 827–831.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37: 350–352.Google Scholar
Stevenson, F. G., Holm, F. A., and Kirkland, K. J. 2000. Optimizing wild oat (Avena fatua) control with ICIA 0604. Weed Technol. 14: 608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53: 299–313.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P. and Hines, T. E. 1997. Weed Science Research Report. Painter, VA: Virginia Tech. Research Rep. 197.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P. and Eaton, N. A. 1999. Grass weed control in timothy for hay. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 155.Google Scholar