Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:17:08.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of American Burnweed (Erechtites hieraciifolia) in Bermudagrass Turf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeffrey L. Atkinson
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Forestry, and Environmental Sciences, E-143 Poole Agriculture Center, Clemson, SC 29634
Robert B. Cross
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Forestry, and Environmental Sciences, E-143 Poole Agriculture Center, Clemson, SC 29634
Lambert B. McCarty*
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Forestry, and Environmental Sciences, E-143 Poole Agriculture Center, Clemson, SC 29634
Alan G. Estes
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Forestry, and Environmental Sciences, E-143 Poole Agriculture Center, Clemson, SC 29634
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

American burnweed is an early successional summer annual species in the Asteraceae. This weed is a poor competitor; however, it rapidly colonizes disturbed and low-maintenance areas, especially following an environmental disturbance. Recently, turfgrass managers have made adjustments to maintenance practices to satisfy budget requirements and address environmental concerns. This has resulted in reduced mowing frequency in some golf course rough and out-of-play turf areas, and has allowed establishment of broadleaf weed species such as American burnweed which would otherwise be controlled by frequent mowing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PRE and POST herbicide treatments for American burnweed control in an unmown bermudagrass golf course rough. Single PRE applications of simazine at 2.24 kg ai ha−1 and indaziflam at 0.06 kg ai ha−1 provided > 80% American burnweed control 24 wk after treatment (WAT) in 2012 and 2013. Sequential combination applications of liquid formulations of dimethenamid-p + pendimethalin (2.24 + 1.68 kg ai ha−1) provided 95% American burnweed control 24 wk after initial treatment in 2012 and 2013. Other PRE treatments did not provide consistent control of American burnweed across rating dates and years. Regardless of year, four POST treatments provided ≥ 87% control at 8 and 16 WAT. These included thiencarbazone + foramsulfuron + halosulfuron (0.02 + 0.044 + 0.07 kg ai ha−1), thiencarbazone + iodosulfuron + dicamba (0.02 + 0.15 + 0.005 kg ai ha−1), triclopyr + clopyralid (0.88 + 0.32 kg ai ha−1), and sulfentrazone + metsulfuron (0.4 + 0.04 kg ai ha−1). Several PRE and POST American burnweed control solutions exist for low maintenance bermudagrass areas. Future research should continue to screen other herbicides for control efficacy and focus on application timing to balance season-long control with minimal chemical inputs.

Erechtites hieraciifolia es una especie anual de verano de sucesión temprana de la familia Asteraceae. Esta maleza es un competidor pobre. Sin embargo, coloniza rápidamente áreas perturbadas y con poco mantenimiento, especialmente después de una perturbación ambiental. Recientemente, especialistas en el manejo de céspedes han hecho ajustes a las prácticas de manejo para satisfacer requisitos de presupuesto y para responder a preocupaciones ambientales. Esto ha resultado en una reducción en la frecuencia de chapia en áreas fuera-de-juego en campos de golf (‘rough’), lo que ha permitido el establecimiento de especies de malezas de hoja ancha tales como E. hieraciifolia, las cuales serían controladas con una chapia frecuente. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar tratamientos de herbicidas PRE y POST para el control de E. hieraciifolia en un rough de un campo de golf con césped bermuda sin chapia. Aplicaciones PRE simples de simazine a 2.24 kg ai ha−1 e indaziflam a 0.06 kg ai ha−1 brindaron >80% de control de E. hieraciifolia a 24 semanas después del tratamiento (WAT) en 2012 y 2013. Aplicaciones secuenciales de combinaciones de formulaciones líquidas de dimethenamid-p + pendimethalin (2.24 + 1.68 kg ai ha−1) brindaron 95% de control de E. hieraciifolia a 24 semanas después del tratamiento inicial en 2012 y 2013. Otros tratamiento PRE no brindaron control consistente de E. hieraciifolia al promediar las fechas de evaluación y los años del estudio. Sin importar el año, cuatro tratamientos POST brindaron ≥87% de control a 8 y 16 WAT. Estos incluyeron thiencarbazone + foramsulfuron + halosulfuron (0.02 + 0.044 + 0.07 kg ai ha−1), thiencarbazone + iodosulfuron + dicamba (0.02 + 0.15 + 0.005 kg ai ha−1), triclopyr + clopyralid (0.88 + 0.32 kg ai ha−1), y sulfentrazone + metsulfuron (0.4 + 0.04 kg ai ha−1). Existen varias soluciones PRE y POST para el control de E. hieraciifolia para áreas con césped bermuda con bajo mantenimiento. Investigaciones futuras deberían continuar evaluando la efectividad de otros herbicidas y enfocarse en el momento de aplicación para balancear el objetivo de control durante toda la temporada de crecimiento con un mínimo de insumos químicos.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abit, MJM, Shaner, DL, Krutz, LJ, Rainbolt, CM, O'Connell, NV, Faber, BA, Hanson, BD (2012) Assessing simazine degradation patterns in Calfironia citrus orchards with different simazine use histories. Air Soil Water Res 5:6978 Google Scholar
Altland, JE, Gilliam, CH, Wehtje, G (2003) Weed control in field nurseries. HortTechnology 13:914 Google Scholar
Barkley, TM (2006) Erechtites . Pages 542, 595, 602604 in Flora of North America Editorial Committee eds. Flora of North American North of Mexico. Vol. 20. Magnoliophyta: Asteridae, Part 7: Asteraceae, part 2. New York, Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM (1996) Role of temperature and light in the germination ecology of buried seeds of weedy species of disturbed forests. II. Erechtites hieracifolia . Can J Bot 74:20022005 Google Scholar
Belcher, RO (1956) A revision of the genus Erechtites (Compositae) with inquiries into Senecio and Arrhenechthites . Ann Mo Bot Gard 43:185 Google Scholar
Bernard, CS, Derr, JF, Krings, A, Lassiter, B, Neal, JC (2012) Weeds of Container Nurseries in the United States. Container Nursery Weed Research Group, North Carolina State University. www.cals.ncsu.edu/plantbiology/ncsc/containerWeeds/. Accessed February 14, 2014Google Scholar
Boring, LR, Monk, CD, Swank, WT (1981) Early regeneration of a clear-cut southern Appalachian forest. Ecology 62:12441253 Google Scholar
Britt, JR, Zutter, BR, Mitchell, RJ, Gjerstad, DH, Dickson, JF (1990) Influence of herbaceous interference on growth and biomass partitioning in planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Weed Sci 38:497503 Google Scholar
Brosnan, JT, Breeden, GK, McCullough, PE, Henry, GM (2012) PRE and POST control of annual bluegrass (Poa annua) with indaziflam. Weed Technol 26:4853 Google Scholar
Brosnan, JT, McCullough, PE, Breeden, GK (2011) Smooth crabgrass control with indaziflam at various spring timings. Weed Technol 25:363366 Google Scholar
Busey, P, Johnston, DL (2006) Impact of cultural factors on weed populations in St. Augustinegrass turf. Weed Sci 54:961967 Google Scholar
Darbyshire, SJ, Ardath, F, DiTommaso, A, Clements, DR (2012) The biology of Canadian weeds. 150 Erechtites hieraciifolius (L.) Raf. ex DC. Can J Plant Sci 92:729746 Google Scholar
Gardiner, ES, Yeiser, JL, Atkins, RL Jr. (1991) Screening of sulfometuron/hexazinone granules for herbaceous weed control. Pages 268272 in Proceedings of the 44th Southern Weed Science Society Annual Meeting. San Antonio, TX: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Hains, BL, Jernstedt, JA, Neufeld, HS (1985) Direct foliar effects of simulated acid rain II. Leaf surface characteristics. New Phytol 99:407416 Google Scholar
Hanson, NS (1962) Weed control practices and research for sugar cane in Hawaii. Weeds 10:192200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, PJS (2012) Common lambsquarters and hairy nightshade control in potato with dimethenamid-p alone and in tank mixtures and comparison of control by dimethenamid-p with S-metholachlor and metolachlor. Weed Technol 26:279283 Google Scholar
Hutchinson, TF, Boerner, REJ, Sutherland, S, Sutherland, EK, Ortt, M, Iverson, LR (2005) Prescribed fire effects on the herbaceous layer of mixed-oak forests. Can J For Res 35:877890 Google Scholar
Landenberger, RE, McGraw, JB (2004) Seed-bank characteristics in mixed-mesophytic forest clearcuts and edges: Does “edge effect” extend to the seed bank? Can J Bot 82:9921000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, WC Jr. (1983) Laboratory germination methods of some native herbaceous plant species: preliminary findings. Newsl Assoc Off Seed Analysts 57:2931 Google Scholar
Lubbers, MD, Stahlman, PW, Al-Khatib, K (2007) Fluroxypyr efficacy is affected by relative humidity and soil moisture. Weed Sci 55:260263 Google Scholar
McCarty, LB, Everest, JW, Hall, DW, Murphy, TR, Yelverton, F (2008) American Burnweed. Pages 179180 in McCarty, LB, ed. Color Atlas of Turfgrass Weeds: A Guide to Weed Identification and Control Strategies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Google Scholar
Perry, DH, McElroy, JS, Doroh, MC, Walker, RH (2011) Indaziflam utilization for controlling problematic turfgrass weeds. Appl Turf Sci DOI: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, CJ, Carson, WP, McCarthy, BC, Picket, STA (1990) Microsite variation and soil dynamics within newly created treefall pits and mounds. Oikos 58:3946 Google Scholar
Proctor, CA, Reicher, ZJ (2013) Efficacy of preemergence and postemergence herbicides for controlling common purslane. HortScience 48:902905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar