Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:38:08.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confirmation of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Montana Cereal Production and Response to POST Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

Vipan Kumar ,
Prashant Jha  and
Amit J. Jhala
Vipan Kumar
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate and Associate Professor, Montana State University–Bozeman, Southern Agricultural Research Center, Huntley, MT 59037
Prashant Jha*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate and Associate Professor, Montana State University–Bozeman, Southern Agricultural Research Center, Huntley, MT 59037
Amit J. Jhala
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
*
*Corresponding author’s Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, horseweed has become an increasing problem in Montana. To confirm and characterize the level of glyphosate resistance, seeds were collected from putative glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed (GR-MT) plants in a wheat–fallow field in McCone County, MT. Known GR (GR-NE) and glyphosate-susceptible (GS-NE) horseweed accessions from Lincoln, NE, were included for comparison in dose–response and shikimate accumulation studies. Whole-plant glyphosate dose–response experiments conducted at the early- (5- to 8-cm diameter) and late- (12- to 15-cm diameter) rosette stages of horseweed indicated that GR-MT accessions had a 2.5- to 4.0-fold level of resistance to glyphosate relative to the GS-NE accession, on the basis of shoot dry weight (GR50 values). The level of resistance was 3.1- to 7.9-fold on the basis of visually assessed injury estimates (I50 values). At the whole-plant level, about 2.1- to 4.5-fold higher shikimate accumulation was observed in the GS-NE accession compared with the GR-MT and GR-NE accessions over a 10-d period after glyphosate was applied at 1,260 g ae ha−1. In a separate greenhouse study, all three horseweed accessions were also screened with alternate POST herbicides registered for use in wheat–fallow rotations. The majority of the tested herbicides provided ≥90% injury at the field-use rates for all three horseweed accessions 3 wk after treatment. This is the first published report on the occurrence of GR horseweed in Montana cereal production. Increased awareness and adoption of best management practices, including the use of diversified (based on multiple sites of action) herbicide programs highlighted in this study, would aid in mitigating the further spread of GR horseweed in the cereal production fields of the U.S. Great Plains.

Keywords

Glyphosatehorseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Glyphosate resistanceglyphosate resistance managementmultiple sites of actionPOST herbicideswheat–fallow
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , December 2017 , pp. 799 - 810
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Michael Walsh, University of Sydney

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, PC, Bekech, MM (1993) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed production, emergence and distribution in no-till and conventional-tillage corn (Zea mays). Agronomy (Trends Agric Sci) 1:67–71 Google Scholar
Brown, SM, Whitwell, T (1988) Influence of tillage on horseweed, Conyza canadensis . Weed Technol 2:269–270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolte, JD (2015). Emergence and Control of Horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Master’s thesis. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. 7 pGoogle Scholar
Buhler, DD, Owen, MDK (1997) Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 45:98–101 Google Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB (2013) Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with dicamba applied preplant and postemergence in dicamba-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 27:492–496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, RB, McCarty, LB, Tharayil, N, McElroy, JS, Chen, S, McCullough, PE, Powell, BA, Bridges, WC Jr (2015) A Pro106 to Ala substitution is associated with resistance to glyphosate in annual bluegrass (Poa annua). Weed Sci 63:613–622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromartie, TH, Polge, ND (2000) An improved assay for shikimic acid and its use as a monitor for the activity of sulfosate. Proc Weed Sci Soc Am 40:291 Google Scholar
Davis, VM, Johnson, WG (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) emergence, survival, and fecundity in no-till soybean. Weed Sci 56:231–236 Google Scholar
Everitt, JD, Keeling, JW (2007) Weed control and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to preplant applications of dicamba, 2,4–D, and diflyfenzopyr plus dicamba. Weed Technol 21:506–510 Google Scholar
Ford, L, Soltani, N, McFadden, A, Nurse, RE, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2014) Control of Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis) with glyphosate DMA/2,4-D choline applications in corn (Zea mays). Agricultural Sciences 5:77–83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamski, G, Ciarka, D, Gressel, J, Gawronski, SW (2000) Negative cross-resistance in triazine-resistant biotypes of Echinochloa crusgalli and Conyza canadensis . Weed Sci 48:176–180 Google Scholar
Gleason, HA, Cronquist, A (1963) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Boston, MA: PWS Publishers. Pp 734 Google Scholar
Green, JM (2011). Outlook on weed management in herbicide-resistant crops: need for diversification. Outlook Pest Manage 22:100--104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, BD, Shrestha, A, Shaner, DL (2009) Distribution of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) and relationship to cropping systems in the Central Valley of California. Weed Sci 57:48–53 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2017). The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: March 4, 2017Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Streibig, JC, Ritz, C (2007) Utilizing R software package for dose–response studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technol 21:840–848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, CH, Poston, DH, Hayes, RM, Montgomery, RF (2004) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Mississippi. Weed Technol 18:820–825 Google Scholar
Koger, CH, Shaner, DL, Henry, WB, Nadler-Hassar, T, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2005) Assessment of two nondestructive assays for detecting glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 53:559–566 Google Scholar
Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2010) Control of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technol 24:425–429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P (2015) Influence of herbicides applied postharvest in wheat stubble on control, fecundity, and progeny fitness of Kochia scoparia in the US Great Plains. Crop Prot 71:144–149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P, Giacomini, D, Westra, E, Westra, P (2015) Molecular basis of evolved resistance to glyphosate and acetolactate synthase-inhibitor herbicides in kochia (Kochia scoparia) accessions from Montana. Weed Sci 63:758–763 Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P, Reichard, N (2014) Occurrence and characterization of kochia (Kochia scoparia) accessions with resistance to glyphosate in Montana. Weed Technol 28:122–130 Google Scholar
Kumar, VK, Spring, JF, Jha, P, Lyon, DJ, Burke, IC (2017) Glyphosate-resistant Russian thistle (Salsola tragus L.) identified in Montana and Washington. Weed Technol 31:238–251Google Scholar
Lenssen, AW, Waddell, J, Johnson, GD Carlson, GR (2007) Diversified cropping systems in semiarid Montana: Nitrogen use during drought. Soil Tillage Res 94:362–375 Google Scholar
Mellendorf, TG, Young, JM, Matthews, JL, Young, BG (2013) Influence of plant height and glyphosate on saflufenacil efficacy on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol 27:463–467 Google Scholar
Miller, JH, Miller, KV (1999) Forest Plants of the Southeast and Their Wildlife Uses. Auburn, AL: Craftmaster. Pp 454 Google Scholar
Mueller, TC, Massey, JH, Hayes, RM, Main, CL, Stewart, CN Jr (2003) Shikimate accumulation in both glyphosate-sensitive and glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis L. Cronq.). J Agric Food Chem 51:680–684 Google Scholar
Nandula, VK, Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Koger, CH, Reddy, KN (2006) Factors affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 54:898–902 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(SP1), 31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, LN, Mueller, TC, Main, CL, Bond, J, Lawrence, E (2011) Evaluating rates and application timings of saflufenacil for control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) prior to planting no-till cotton. Weed Technol 25:1–5 Google Scholar
Perez-Jones, A, Park, KW, Polge, N, Colquhoun, J, Mallory-Smith, CA (2007) Investigating the mechanisms of glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum . Planta 226:395–404 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritz, C, Baty, F, Streibig, JC, Gerhard, D (2015) Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS One 10:e0146021 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seefeldt, SS, Jensen, JE, Fuerst, EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218–227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, DR, Givens, WA, Farno, LA, Gerard, PD, Jordan, D, Johnson, WG, Welle, SC, Young, BG, Wilson, RG, Owen, MD (2009) Using a grower survey to assess the benefits and challenges of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems for weed management in US corn, cotton, and soybean. Weed Technol 23: 134–149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, EJ, Dauer, JT, VanGessel, MJ, Neumann, G (2006) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Sci 54:1063–1067 Google Scholar
Simarmata, M, Kaufmann, JE, Penner, D (2003) Potential basis of glyphosate resistance in California rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Weed Sci 51:678–382 Google Scholar
Smisek, A, Doucet, C, Jones, M, Weaver, S (1998) Paraquat resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis) and Virginia pepperweed (Lepidium virginicum) from Essex County, Ontario. Weed Sci 46:200–204 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Craig, CC, Hayes, RM (2006) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control with glufosinate prior to planting no-till cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 20:1047–1051 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Gwathmey, CO (2009) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) growth, seed production, and interference in cotton. Weed Sci 57:346–350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, M, Baerson, S, Brinker, R, Casagrande, L, Faletti, M, Feng, Y, Nemeth, M, Reynolds, T, Rodriguez, D, Shaffer, D, Stalker, D, Taylor, N, Teng, Y, Dill, G (1999). Characterization of glyphosate resistant Eleusine indica biotypes from Malaysia. Pages 527–536 in Proceedings of the 17th Asia-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Bangkok: Asian-Pacific Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, MJ, Ayeni, AO, Majek, BA (2001) Glyphosate in full season no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean: role of preplant applications and residual herbicides. Weed Technol 15:714–724 Google Scholar
Wakelin, AM, Preston, C (2006) A target-site mutation is present in a glyphosate-resistant Lolium rigidum population. Weed Res 46:432–440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SE (2001) The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis . Can J Plant Sci 81:867–875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, FL, Yenish, JP, Launchbaugh, GK, McGrew, LL, Alldredge, JR (2008) Postharvest control of Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) with a reduced herbicide applicator in the Pacific Northwest. Weed Technol 22:156–159 Google Scholar