Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:07:16.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Glyphosate Products in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert G. Parker ,
Alan C. York  and
David L. Jordan
Robert G. Parker*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wide-spread planting of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops in the United States and glyphosate patent expiration has led to a proliferation of glyphosate products. Growers have questioned their advisors on efficacy and crop tolerance of the many products available. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate eight glyphosate products in 2002 and ten in 2003, representing isopropylamine, diammonium, and potassium salts, applied POST and postemergence-directed (PDIR) at 630 and 1,680 g ae/ha for GR corn and GR cotton tolerance and weed control. There were no differences among products for control of six annual grass and 10 annual broadleaf weed species. No injury to corn from any glyphosate product at 630 or 1,680 g/ha or to cotton from 630 g/ha was noted at any of seven locations. ClearOut 41 Plus™, an isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, and Roundup WEATHERMAX™, a potassium salt of glyphosate, applied POST at 1,680 g/ha injured cotton 27 to 30% and 10 to 17%, respectively, at 3 of 7 locations. No cotton injury was noted with Glyfos®, Glyfos® X-TRA, Glyphomax™, Gly Star™ Original, Roundup Original™, Roundup UltraMAX®, Touchdown®, or Touchdown Total™. No differences were noted among glyphosate products or between rates for corn or cotton yield or cotton fiber properties.

Keywords

Glyphosatecorn, Zea mays L. ‘DK687’, ‘DKC 69-71’cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DP 458 B/RR’, ‘ST 4892BR’ClearOut 41 Plus™crop tolerancediammonium salt of glyphosateGlyfos®Glyfos® X-TRAGlyphomax™Gly Star™ Originalisopropylamine salt of glyphosatepotassium salt of glyphosateRoundup Original™Roundup UltraMAX®Roundup WEATHERMAX™Touchdown®Touchdown Total™weed controlEPSPS, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase; GR, glyphosate-resistant; PDIR, postemergence-directed; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; WAP, wk after postemergence application; WAP1, wk after first postemergence application; WAP2, wk after second postemergence application; WAPD, wk after postemergence-directed application
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 796 - 802
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2004a. Clearout 41 Plus herbicide label. CPT, LLC, Cartersville, GA: Web page: http://www.cptllc.com/clearout/ClearOut%2041%20Plus%20Booklet%20Rev%207-15-02.pdf. Accessed: March 22, 2004.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004b. Roundup WEATHERMAX herbicide label. Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO: Web page: http://www.cdms.net/Idat/Id5UJ000.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2004.Google Scholar
Ateh, C. M. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:394–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloodworth, K. M., Reynolds, D. B., Barber, L. T., and Buehring, N. W. 2002. Comparison of weed control and tolerance in Roundup Ready cotton with various formulations of glyphosate. in McRae, J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America: Web page: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2002/abstracts/M042.cfm. Accessed: March 22, 2004.Google Scholar
Buehring, N. W., Reynolds, D. B., Wilson, D. G., Sanders, J. C., and Barber, L. T. 2003. Roundup Ready cotton tolerance to various glyphosate formulations. in Richter, D. A., ed. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. Pp. 2269. Web page: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2003/abstracts/M027.cfm. Accessed: March 22, 2004.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Askew, S. D., Thomas, W. E., and Wilcut, J. Wi. 2004. Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol. 18:443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1999. Weed management and net returns with transgenic, herbicide-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 13:411–420.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 2001. Comparing Roundup Ultra and Touchdown IQ in glyphosate-resistant cotton. in Dugger, P. C. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. Pp. 1232. Web page: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2001/abstracts/542.cfm. Accessed: March 22, 2004.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:77–88.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Inhibition of amino acid biosynthesis. in Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pp. 251–291.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. E., Hayes, R. M., Mueller, T. C., and Rhodes, G. N. 2000. Influence of Basagran on soybean response to Touchdown 5 and Roundup Ultra. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:43–44.Google Scholar
Faircloth, W. H., Patterson, M. G., Monks, C. D., and Goodman, W. R. 2001. Weed management programs for glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 15:544–551.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 2002. Comparison of glyphosate with other herbicides for weed control in corn (Zea mays): efficacy and economics. Weed Technol. 16:701–706.Google Scholar
Frans, R. E., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. Pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Franz, J. E., Mao, M. K., and Sikorski, J. A. 1997. Toxicology and environmental properties of glyphosate. in Glyphosate: A Unique Global Herbicide. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Monogr. 189. Pp. 103–137.Google Scholar
Gimenez, A. E., York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Batts, R. B. 1998. Annual grass control by glyphosate plus bentazon, chlorimuron, chlorimuron, fomesafen, and imazethapyr mixtures. Weed Technol. 12:134–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, S. A., Loux, M. M., Cardina, J., and Harrison, S. K. 2002. Effect of planting date, residual herbicide, and postemergence application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-tolerant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:488–494.Google Scholar
Krauz, R. F. and Young, B. G. 2001. Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) to trimethylsulfonium and isopropylamine salts of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15:745–749.Google Scholar
MacDonald, G. E., Tredaway, J. A., and Gallo-Meagher, M. 2000. The effects of glyphosate and sulfosate on Roundup-Ready® cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:145.Google Scholar
Malik, J. M., Barry, G. F., and Kishore, G. M. 1989. The herbicide glyphosate. Biofactors 2:17–25.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2003. Prospective Plantings: Web page: http://www.usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/Reports/NASS/field/pcpbbp/psp10303.pdf. Accessed: March 22, 2004.Google Scholar
Nida, D. L., Kolacz, K. H., and Buehler, R. E. et al. 1996. Glyphosate-resistant cotton: genetic characterization and protein expression. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:1960–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, S. A. and Young, B. G. 2002. Efficacy and economic return on investment for conventional and herbicide-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:371–378.Google Scholar
Norris, J. L., Shaw, D. R., and Snipes, C. E. 2001. Weed control from herbicide combinations with three formulations of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15:552–558.Google Scholar
Rankins, A. Jr., Bloodworth, W. F., and Reynolds, D. B. 2001. Comparison of efficacy and Roundup Ready crop tolerance to various EPSPS inhibiting herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:6–7.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. J., Bailey, W. A., Armel, G. R., Whaley, C. M., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2003. Responses of selected weeds and glyphosate-resistant cotton and soybean to two glyphosate salts. Weed Technol. 17:560–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasser, P. E. 1981. The basics of high volume instruments for fiber testing. in Brown, J. M., ed. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. Pp. 191–193.Google Scholar
Schraer, S. M., Cloud, G. L., Minton, B. W., Porterfield, D. D., Martin, S. H., Driver, J. E., Lunsford, J., Black, D. L., and Foresman, C. 2002. Touchdown® with IQ Technology vs. Roundup™ Ultramax: tolerance and yield of Roundup Ready cotton. in McRae, J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America: Web page: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2002/abstracts/M056.cfm. Accessed: March 22, 2004.Google Scholar
Scott, D. R., Bean, B. W., Rowland, M. W., Shuster, G., and Mehlhorn, J. 2000. Weed control and corn injury with glyphosate and sulfosate in Roundup Ready™ corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:21.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Glyphosate systems for weed control in glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 16:191–198.Google Scholar
Siehl, D. L. 1997. Inhibition of EPSP synthase, glutamine synthetase and histidine synthesis. in Roe, R. M. ed., Herbicide Activity: Toxicology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press. Pp. 37–67.Google Scholar
Smith, M. C., Shaw, D. R., and Kelley, F. S. 2003. A comparison of weed control with commercially available glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:38.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. E., Burke, I. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2004. Weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn with glyphosate and halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 18:1049–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. E., Burke, I. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2004. Weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn with glyphosate, halosulfuron, and mesotrione. Weed Technol. 18:826–834.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. E., Pline-Srnic, W. A., Thomas, J. F., Edmisten, K. L., Wells, R., and Wilcut, J. W. 2004. Glyphosate negatively affects pollen viability but not pollination and seed set in glyphosate-resistant corn. Weed Sci. 52:725–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA–AMS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agriculture Marketing Service. 2003. Cotton varieties planted—2003 crop. USDA-AMS, Memphis, TN. Web page: http://www.ams.usda.gov/cotton/. Accessed: March 4, 2004.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Coble, H. D., York, A. C., and Monks, D. W. 1996. The niche for herbicide-resistant crops in U.S. agriculture. in Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 213–230.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33:531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar