Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:08:08.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Application Methods and Tillage Practices on Volatilization of Clomazone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kurt D. Thelen
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in 1985 and 1986 to determine the effect of incorporation on volatilization of clomazone from soil. Volatilization was detected up to 2 weeks after surface-applied or soil-incorporated treatments of clomazone at 1.1 kg ai/ha. The amount of volatilization detected was greatest following rainfall and varied between years. More clomazone volatilized after surface application than after incorporation, regardless of the climatic conditions present. Clomazone volatilization detected was in the order of no-tillage > minimum tillage > conventional tillage.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II: Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Burt, G. W. 1974. Volatility of atrazine from plant, soil, and glass surfaces. J. Environ. Qual. 3:114117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Duke, S. O., Kenyon, W. H., and Paul, R. N. 1985. FMC-57020 effects on chloroplast development in pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) cotyledons. Weed Sci. 33:786794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gray, R. A., and Weierich, A. J. 1965. Factors affecting the vapor loss of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Halstead, S. J., and Harvey, R. G. 1985. Factors affecting off-site movement of FMC-57020. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:88.Google Scholar
6. Halstead, S. J., and Harvey, R. G. 1986. Off-site movement of FMC-57020: 1986 trials. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:4243.Google Scholar
7. Halvorson, G. C., Dobbins, L. D., and Hopper, D. M. 1985. FMC-57020–1985 EUP results. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:8081.Google Scholar
8. Harvey, R. G. 1974. Soil adsorption and volatility of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:120124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Inskeep, W. P., and Bloom, P. R. 1985. Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N,N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiol. 77:483485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Moran, R., and Porath, D. 1980. Chlorophyll determination in intact tissues using N,N-dimethylformamide. Plant Physiol. 65:478479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1987. Factors affecting the loss of EPTC applied through a sprinkler. Weed Technol. 1:162164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Parochetti, J. V., and Hein, E. R. 1973. Volatility and photo-decomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21:469473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Parochetti, J. V., Dec, G. W. Jr., and Burt, G. W. 1976. Volatility of 11 dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:529532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Parochetti, J. V., Hein, E. R., and Colby, S. R. 1971. Volatility of dichlobenil. Weed Sci. 19:2831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Richards, R. P., Kramer, J. W., Baker, D. B., and Krieger, K. A. 1987. Pesticides in rainwater in the Northeastern United States. Nature 327:129131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar