Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:32:59.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Resistance to Selected ALS-Inhibiting Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Christy L. Sprague
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Crop Protection Research Unit, Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Edward W. Stoller
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Crop Protection Research Unit, Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Crop Protection Research Unit, Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Five biotypes of common cocklebur that were not controlled with acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides were tested in greenhouse and laboratory studies to determine the magnitude of resistance and cross-resistance to four ALS-inhibiting herbicides. In vivo inhibition of ALS was also evaluated. Based on phytotoxicity, all five ALS-resistant biotypes of common cocklebur were > 390 times more resistant than the susceptible biotype to imazethapyr. However, only four of these biotypes were also resistant to another imidazolinone, imazaquin. Two biotypes were cross-resistant to the sulfonylurea, chlorimuron, and the triazolopyrimidine sulfonanilide, NAF-75. One biotype demonstrated intermediate susceptibility to imazaquin, chlorimuron, and NAF-75. In all cases, the resistance exhibited at the whole plant level was associated with an insensitive ALS.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. New York: Marcel-Dekker. pp. 117190.Google Scholar
Brown, H. M. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29:263281.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D., Maries, S., and Hall, L. M. 1991. Inhibition of acetolactate synthase in susceptible and resistant biotypes of Stellaria media . Pestic. Sci. 31:273280.Google Scholar
Gerwick, B. C., Mireles, L. C., and Eilers, R. J. 1993. Rapid diagnosis of ALS/AHAS-resistant weeds. Weed Technol. 7:519524.Google Scholar
Gerwick, B. C., Subramanian, M. V., Loney-Gallant, V. I., and Chandler, D. P. 1990. Mechanism of action of the 1,2,4-triazolo(1,5-a)pyrimidines. Pestic. Sci. 29:357364.Google Scholar
Hall, L. M. and Devine, M. D. 1990. Cross-resistance of a chlorsulfuron-resistant biotype of Stellaria media to a triazolopyrimidine herbicide. Plant Physiol. 93:962966.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E., Saunders, J. W., and Penner, D. 1992. Chlorsulfuron-resistant sugarbeet: cross-resistance and physiological basis of resistance. Weed Sci. 40:378383.Google Scholar
Kendig, J. A. and DeFelice, M. S. 1994. ALS resistant cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) in Missouri. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 34:34.Google Scholar
Lovell, S. T., Wax, L. M., Simpson, D. M., and McGlamery, M. 1997. Using the in vivo ALS assay for identifying herbicide-resistant weeds. Weed Technol. In press.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Dial, M. J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 4:163168.Google Scholar
Newhouse, K., Wang, T., and Anderson, P. 1991. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops. In Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 139150.Google Scholar
Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:169172.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Primiani, M. M. 1990. Mechanism of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in the broadleaf weed, Kochia scoparia . Plant Physiol. 93:5561.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., Primiani, M. M., and Smith, W. F. 1992. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in common chickweed, perennial ryegrass, and Russian thistle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 42:110118.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. pp. 83140.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, P. R., Eilers, R. J., and Cseke, C. 1993. Lack of cross-resistance of imazaquin-resistant Xanthium strumarium acetolactate synthase to flumetsulam and chlorimuron. Plant Physiol. 103:281283.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 1991. Mechanisms of resistance to acetolactate synthase/acetohydroxyacid synthase inhibitors. In Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 187198.Google Scholar
Simpson, D. M., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1995. An in vivo acetolactate synthase assay. Weed Technol. 9:1722.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. pp. 173175.Google Scholar
Westerfield, W. W. 1945. A colorimetric determination of blood acetoin. J. Biol. Chem. 161:495502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed