Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:20:08.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Cattail, Typha latifolia L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Larry M. Mitich
Larry M. Mitich*
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

      Straight-backed sentinels in high crowned busbies
      rise in crowded companies
      from river bank and marsh.
      Grown old and fluffed with a thousand florets
      gone to seed, the heads make fine torches
      for skaters on the pond.
    (“Cattails,” Prentice and Sargent 1973)

Until recent times, Typha was the sole genus of Typhaceae, the cattail family. Now the family has been extended to include Sparganium, the burreeds. The 15 species of Typha are prevalent and bothersome emergent aquatic weeds with a worldwide distribution (Heywood 1993; Hickman 1993). The genus Typha was erected in 1753 by Carolus Linnaeus in his Genera Plantarum.

Type
Intriguing World of Weeds
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 446 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Boyd, C. E. 1970. Vascular aquatic plants for mineral nutrient removal from polluted waters. Econ. Bot. 24: 94–103.Google Scholar
Comes, R., Bruns, V., and Kelly, A. 1978. Longevity of certain weeds and crop seeds in fresh water. Weed Sci. 26: 336–344.Google Scholar
Darlington, W. 1859. American Weeds and Useful Plants. New York: Orange Judd. 460 p.Google Scholar
Dickerman, J. A. and Wetzel, R. G. 1985. Clonal growth in Typha latifolia: population dynamics and demography of the raments. J. Ecol. 73: 535–552.Google Scholar
Duke, J. A. 1992. Handbook of Edible Weeds. Boco Raton, FL: CRC Press. 246 p.Google Scholar
Fletcher, H. C. and Elmendorf, H. B. 1955. Phreatophytes—a serious problem in the West. U.S. Dep. Agric. Yearb. Agric. 1955: 423–429.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. and Cronquist, A. 1963. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. Princeton, NJ: D. van Norstrand. 810 p.Google Scholar
Grace, J. B. and Harrison, J. S. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 73. Typha latifolia L., Typha angustifolia L. and Typha xglauca Godr. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66: 361–379.Google Scholar
Gray, A. 1857. Lessons in Botany and Vegetable Physiology (with a Manual of Botany). NY: Ivison, Blakeman, Taylor and Co. 703 p.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. D. and Matsumura, Y. 1967. Edible Native Plants of the Rocky Mountains. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press 392 p.Google Scholar
Harris, B. C. 1971. Eat the Weeds. Barre, MA: Barre Publishers. 223 p.Google Scholar
Heywood, V. H. 1993. Flowering Plants of the World. New York: Oxford University Press. 335 p.Google Scholar
Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual, Higher Plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1,400 p.Google Scholar
Holm, L., Doll, J., Holm, E., Pancho, J., and Herberger, J. 1997. World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. New York: John Wiley. 1,129 p.Google Scholar
Hyam, R. and Pankhurst, P. 1995. Plants and Their Names, A Concise Dictionary. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press. 545 p.Google Scholar
Keddy, P. and Ellis, T. 1985. Seedling recruitment of 11 wetland plant species along a water level gradient: shared or distinct responses? Can. J. Bot. 63: 1,876–1,879.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 626 p.Google Scholar
Krattinger, K. 1975. Genetic mobility in Typha . Aquat. Bot. 1: 57–70.Google Scholar
McMillan, C. 1959. Salt tolerance within a Typha population. Am. J. Bot. 46: 521–526.Google Scholar
Morong, T. 1888. Studies in the Typhaceae. I. Typha . Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 15: 1–8.Google Scholar
Morton, J. F. 1975. Cattails (Typha spp.)—weed problem or potential crop? Econ. Bot. 29: 7–29.Google Scholar
Muenscher, W. C. 1955. Weeds. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan. 579 p.Google Scholar
Otis, C. H. 1914. The transpiration of emersed water plants: its measurements and its relationships. Bot. Gaz. 58: 457–494.Google Scholar
Prentice, T. M. and Sargent, E. O. 1973. Weeds & Wildflowers of Eastern North America. Peabody Museum of Salem. Unpaginated.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1836. New Flora of North America. Part 2. Neophyton. Published by the author, Philadelphia, PA: Reprinted by Arnold Arboretum. Jamaica Plain, MA. 1946.Google Scholar
Schuessler, R. 1960. The captivating cattail. Crops Soils Mag. 13 (20): 13.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. and Weiner, E.S.C. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed, Volume 2. Oxford, Great Britain: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1967. Experimental and natural hybrids in North America Typha (Typhaceae). Am Midl. Nat. 78: 257–287.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1970. Selected Weeds of the United States. Washington, DC: USDA. 463 p.Google Scholar
Woodcock, E. F. 1925. Observations on the poisonous plants in Michigan. Am. J. Bot. 12: 116–131.Google Scholar
Yeo, R R. 1964. Life history of the common cattail. Weeds. 12: 284–288.Google Scholar