Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-19T05:37:07.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Commercial Sprayer Efficiency for Application Success on Targeted Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2025

Tristen H. Avent
Affiliation:
Senior Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Distinguished Professor and Elms Farming Chair of Weed Science, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Marcelo Zimmer
Affiliation:
Program Specialist, Department of Botany & Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany & Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Diego J. Contreras
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Wesley J. Everman
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Iowa State University, Department of Agronomy, Ames, IA
Aaron G. Hager
Affiliation:
Professor and Faculty Extension Specialist, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Crop Sciences, Urbana, IL
William L. Patzoldt
Affiliation:
Senior Principal Agronomist, Blue River Technology Santa Clara, CA, USA
Lauren M. Schwartz-Lazaro
Affiliation:
Senior Agronomist at Blue River Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Michael M. Houston
Affiliation:
Senior Agronomist at Blue River Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Thomas R. Butts
Affiliation:
Clinical Assistant Professor, Extension Weed Scientist, Department of Botany & Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Alan R. Vazquez
Affiliation:
Research Professor, School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Commercializing targeted sprayer systems allows producers to reduce herbicide inputs but risks the possibility of not treating emerging weeds. Currently, targeted applications with the John Deere system allow for five spray sensitivity settings, and no published literature discusses the impact of these settings on detecting and spraying weeds of varying species, sizes, and positions in crops. Research was conducted in AR, IL, IN, MS, and NC in corn, cotton, and soybean to determine how various factors might influence the ability of targeted applications to treat weeds. These data included 21 weed species aggregated to six classes with height, width, and densities, ranging from 25 to 0.25 cm, 25 to 0.25 cm, and 14.3 to 0.04 plants m-2, respectively. Crop and weed density did not influence the likelihood of treating the weeds. As expected, the sensitivity setting alters the ability to treat weeds. Targeted applications (across sensitivity settings, median weed height and width, and density of 2.4 plants m-2) resulted in a treatment success of 99.6% to 84.4%, 99.1% to 68.8%, 98.9% to 62.9%, 99.1% to 70.3%, 98.0% to 48.3%, and 98.5% to 55.8% for Convolvulaceae, decumbent broadleaf weeds, Malvaceae, Poaceae, Amaranthaceae, and yellow nutsedge, respectively. Reducing the sensitivity setting reduced the ability to treat weeds. Size of weeds aided targeted application success, with larger weeds being more readily treated through easier detection. Based on these findings, various conditions could impact the outcome of targeted multi-nozzle applications. Additionally, the analyses highlight some of the parameters to consider when using these technologies.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America