Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:29:45.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Citronmelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) Control in Texas Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Using Soil-Applied Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. James Grichar ,
Brent A. Besler  and
Kevin D. Brewer
W. James Grichar*
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
Brent A. Besler
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
Kevin D. Brewer
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1995 through 1998 to evaluate citronmelon control in peanut with various preplant and preemergence combinations of dimethenamid, flumioxazin, imazethapyr, lactofen, metolachlor, oxyfluorfen, and pendimethalin. Pendimethalin alone or in combination with imazethapyr, metolachlor, or dimethenamid did not control citronmelon. Flumioxazin alone, pendimethalin plus flumioxazin, or pendimethalin followed by (fb) lactofen controlled citronmelon at least 85% early season. Pendimethalin fb lactofen controlled citronmelon at least 75% late season, whereas all other herbicide treatments controlled less than 70%.

Keywords

Dimethenamidflumioxazinimazethapyrlactofenmetolachloroxyfluorfenpendimethalincitronmelon, Citrullus lanatus var. citroides (Bailey) Mansf. #3 CITLCpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘GK-7’Groundnutpiemelonpreemergencepreplant incorporatedDAP, days after plantingfb, followed byPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPREpreemergenceWAP, weeks after planting
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 528 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1990. Weed Identification Guide. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. pp. 193–194.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J. and Colvin, D. L. 1991. Weed management in peanuts. In Pimentel, D., ed. CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. 2nd ed., Volume 3. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 239–251.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1982. Weeds and their control in peanuts. In Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: American Peanut Research and Education Society. pp. 209–249.Google Scholar
Edenfield, M. W., Colvin, D. L., Brecke, B. J., Shilling, D. G., and McLean, H. H. 2001. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with pyridate and SAN 582 systems. Weed Technol. 15: 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiebig, W. W., Schilling, D. G., and Knauft, D. A. 1991. Peanut genotype response to interference from common cocklebur. Crop Sci. 31: 1289–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. 1997. Influence of herbicides and timing of application on broadleaf weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 11: 708–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Besler, B. A., and Brewer, K. D. 2001. Citronmelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) control in Texas peanut (Arachis hypogaea) using postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 15: 481–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Colburn, A. E. 1996. Flumioxazin for weed control in Texas peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Peanut Sci. 23: 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., Murdock, E. C., and Tolar, J. E. 1988. Recovery of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederaceae) following applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen. Weed Sci. 36: 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Wilcut, J. W., and Swann, C. W. 1993. Application timing of lactofen for broadleaf weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 20: 129–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. A., Wells, L. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Bristly starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum) interference in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37: 196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., Grichar, W. J., and Wehtje, G. R. 1995. The biology and management of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). In Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. pp. 207–244.Google Scholar
Young, J. H., Person, N. K., Donald, J. O., and Mayfield, W. H. 1982. Harvesting, curing, and energy utilization. In Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: American Peanut Research and Education Society. pp. 458–487.Google Scholar