Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:35:37.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Spontaneous Crosses between Clearfield Rice (Oryza sativa) and Red Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vinod K. Shivrain ,
Nilda R. Burgos ,
Karen A. K. Moldenhauer ,
Ronald W. Mcnew  and
Tomilea L. Baldwin
Vinod K. Shivrain
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704
Nilda R. Burgos*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704
Karen A. K. Moldenhauer
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704
Ronald W. Mcnew
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704
Tomilea L. Baldwin
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to determine the inheritance of resistance in crosses between imazethapyr-resistant rice and red rice. Past experiments on red rice control, using the Clearfield rice technology, resulted in outcrossing between Clearfield rice and Stuttgart strawhull red rice. The F2 generation of these spontaneous crosses were characterized with respect to inheritance of imazethapyr resistance, leaf color and leaf pubescence, and seed shattering, pubescence, color, and size. Agronomic traits of hybrids were also observed in relation to their parents. To determine the segregation of resistance among F2 phenotypes, the response of three- to four-leaf plants to imazethapyr was scored 3 wk after application as resistant (R, no imazethapyr symptoms), susceptible (S, death of plants), or intermediate (I, stunted plants). R, I, and S phenotypes segregated in a 1:2:1 ratio in the F2 generation. Two- or three-gene inheritance was documented for leaf and seed characteristics. A wide range in onset of flowering (70 to 130 d after planting) was observed in F2 families, although 6% of the plants did not flower during the growing season. F2 plants were taller and had more tillers than any of their parents. Resistance to imazethapyr is associated with a single, incompletely dominant allele.

Keywords

Imazethapyrred rice, Oryza sativa L. #3 ORYSArice, Oryza sativa L.‘CL121’, ‘CL161’Imazethapyr-tolerant riceoutcrossingALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18)CL, ‘Clearfield’ riceDAP, days after plantingRR, red riceRREC, Rice Research and Extension CenterWAP, weeks after plantingWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 576 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Avila, L. A., Lee, D. J., Senseman, S. A., McCauley, G. N., Chandler, J. M., and Cothren, J. T. 2005. Assessment of acetolactate synthase (ALS) tolerance to imazethapyr in red rice ecotypes (Oryza spp) and imidazolinone tolerant/resistant rice (Oryza sativa) varieties. Pest Manag. Sci. 61:171–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, M. L. and Hodges, S. A. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:67–71.Google Scholar
Arriola, P. E. and Ellstrand, N. C. 1997. Fitness of interspecific hybrids in the genus Sorghum: persistence of crop genes in wild populations. Ecol. Appl. 7:512–518.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. L. 2003. Weed control systems with imazethapyr-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa L). Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. 108 p.Google Scholar
Boudry, P., Rchen, M. M., Sambaed, P. L., Verne, P., and Dick, H. D. 1993. The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar beets. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:471–478.Google Scholar
Cai, H. W. and Morishima, H. 2000. Genomic regions affecting seed shattering and seed dormancy in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:840–846.Google Scholar
Capinpin, M. M. 1964. Studies on first generation crosses between Indica and Japonica groups of Oryza. Aranea J. Agric. 11:1–18.Google Scholar
Cartwright, R. D. and Lee, F. N. 2005. Management of rice diseases. in Slowdown, N. A., ed. Rice Production Handbook. Little Rock, AK: Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas. Pp 87–100.Google Scholar
Do Lago, A. A. 1982. Characterization of red rice (Oryza sativa L.) phenotypes in Mississippi. Ph.D. Dissertation. Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 143 p.Google Scholar
Dunand, R. T., Webster, E. P., and Linscombe, S. D. 2002. Gibberellic acid and crop injury in Clearfield rice. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:117.Google Scholar
Ellstrand, N. C. 2001. When transgenes wander, should we worry? Plant Physiol. 125:1543–1545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellstrand, N. C. and Hoffman, C. A. 1990. Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. Bioscience 40:438–442.Google Scholar
Gealy, D. R. and Dilday, R. H. 1997. Biology of red rice (Oryza sativa L.) accessions and their susceptibility to glufosinate and other herbicides. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 37:34.Google Scholar
[IRRI] International Rice Research Institute. 1980. Descriptors for Rice (Oryza sativa L.) by IBPGR-IRRI Rice Advisory Committee. Manila, Philippines: The International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Langevin, S. A., Clay, K., and Grace, J. B. 1990. The incidence and effects of hybridization between cultivated rice and its related weed rice (Oryza sativa L). Evolution 44:1000–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, R. J. 2004. Imidazolinone-tolerant rice: weed control, crop response, and environmental impact. Ph.D. Dissertation. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA. 66 p.Google Scholar
Malik, M. S., Talbert, R. E., Scherder, E. F., and Lovelace, M. L. 2002. Use of imazethapyr for barnyardgrass control in conventional and stale seedbed production in Clearfield rice. Proc. Rice Tech. Working Group 29:167.Google Scholar
Messeguer, J. 2003. Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 73:201–212.Google Scholar
Messeguer, J., Marfa, V., Catala, M. M., Guiderdoni, E., and Mele, E. 2004. A field study of pollen-mediated gene flow from Mediterranean GM rice to conventional rice and the red rice weed. Mol. Breed 13:103–112.Google Scholar
Noldin, J. A., Yokoyama, S., Antunes, P., and Luzzardi, R. 2002. Outcrossing potential of glufosinate-resistant rice to red rice. Planta Daninha 20:243–251.Google Scholar
Oard, J., Cohn, M. A., Linscombe, S., Gealy, D. R., and Gravois, K. 2000. Field evaluation of seed production, shattering, and dormancy in hybrid populations of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) and the weed, red rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Sci. 157:13–22.Google Scholar
Oka, H. I. and Chang, W. T. 1961. Hybrid swarms between wild and cultivated rice species, Oryza perennis and O. sativa . Evolution 21:418–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2005. SAS OnlineDoc, Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sankula, S., Braverman, M. P., and Oard, J. H. 1998. Genetic analysis of glufosinate resistance in crosses between transformed rice (Oryza sativa) and red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 12:209–214.Google Scholar
Snow, A. A., Pilson, D., Rieseberg, L. H., Paulsen, M. J., Pleskac, N., Reagon, M. R., Wolf, D. E., and Selbo, S. M. 2003. A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecol. Appl. 13:279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, A. A., Uthus, K. L., and Culley, T. M. 2001. Fitness of hybrids between weedy and cultivated radish: implications for weed evolution. Ecol. Appl. 11:934–943.Google Scholar
Song, Z., Lu, B., Zhu, Y., and Chen, J. 2002. Pollen competition between cultivated and wild rice species (Oryza sativa and O. rufipogon). New Phytol. 153:289–296.Google Scholar
Song, Z. P., Lu, B. R., Zhu, Y. G., and Chen, J. K. 2003. Gene flow from cultivated rice to the wild species Oryza rufipogon under experimental field conditions. New Phytol. 157:657–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Z. P., Lu, B. R., Wang, B., and Chen, J. K. 2004. Fitness estimation through performance comparison of F1 hybrids with their parental species Oryza rufipogon and O. sativa . Ann. Bot. 93:1–6.Google Scholar
Volenberg, D. S. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 2002. Inheritance of resistance in eastern black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) to acetolactate synthase inhibitors. Weed Sci. 50:731–736.Google Scholar
Volenberg, D. S., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Boerboom, C. M. 2001. Biochemical mechanism and inheritance of cross-resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors in giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 49:635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. H. 1993. Invaders, weeds and the risk from genetically manipulated organisms. Experientia (Basel) 49:219–224.Google Scholar
Zhang, N., Linscombe, S., Oard, J., and Zhang, N. Y. 2003. Outcrossing frequency and genetic analysis of hybrids between transgenic glufosinate herbicide-resistant rice and the weed, red rice. Euphytica 130:35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Linscombe, S., Webster, E., and Oard, J. 2004. Risk assessment and genetic analysis of natural outcrossing in Louisiana commercial fields between Clearfield rice and the weed, red rice. Proc. Rice Tech. Working Group 30:195.Google Scholar