Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:24:44.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cereal rye cover crop and herbicide application method affect cotton stand, Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control, and cotton yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2019

Lavesta C. Hand Open the ORCID record for Lavesta C. Hand [Opens in a new window] ,
Robert L. Nichols ,
Theodore M. Webster  and
A. Stanley Culpepper
Lavesta C. Hand*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
Robert L. Nichols
Affiliation:
Senior Director of Agronomy, Weed Control, Nematology, and Pathology, Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC, USA
Theodore M. Webster
Affiliation:
Deceased, Supervisory Research Agronomist, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Tifton, GA, USA
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Lavesta C. Hand, University of Georgia, Coastal Plains Research Station, 2356 Rainwater Road, NESPAL Building, Tifton, GA 31794. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six on-farm studies determined the effects of a rolled rye cover crop, herbicide program, and planting technique on cotton stand, weed control, and cotton yield in Georgia. Treatments included: (1) rye drilled broadcast with 19-cm row spacing and a broadcast-herbicide program (2) rye drilled with a 25-cm rye-free zone in the cotton row and a broadcast-herbicide program (3) rye drilled with a 25-cm rye-free zone in the cotton row with PPI and PRE herbicides banded in the cotton planting row, and (4) no cover crop (i.e., weedy cover) with broadcast herbicides. At two locations, cotton stand was lowest with rye drilled broadcast; at these sites the rye-free zone maximized stand equal to the no-cover system. At a third location, cover crop systems resulted in greater stand, due to enhanced soil moisture preservation compared with the no-cover system. Treatments did not influence cotton stand at the other three locations and did not differ in the control of weeds other than Palmer amaranth at any location. Treatments controlled Palmer amaranth equally at three locations; however, differences were observed at the three locations having the greatest glyphosate-resistant plant densities. For these locations, when broadcasting herbicides, Palmer amaranth populations were reduced 82% to 86% in the broadcast rye and rye-free zone systems compared with the no-cover system at harvest. The system with banded herbicides was nearly 21 times less effective than the similar system broadcasting herbicides. At these locations, yields in the rye broadcast and rye-free zone systems with broadcast herbicides were increased 9% to 16% compared with systems with no cover or a rye-free zone with PPI and PRE herbicides banded. A rolled rye cover crop can lessen weed emergence and selection pressure while improving weed control and cotton yield, but herbicides should be broadcast in fields heavily infested with glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth.

Keywords

Jason Bond, Mississippi State Universitycereal ryeSecale cereale L.Palmer amaranthAmaranthus palmeri S. Watson AMAPAcottonGossypium hirsutum L.Blowoutconservation tillagerye-free zonestrip tillage
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 794 - 799
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aulakh, JS, Saini, M, Price, AJ, Faircloth, WH, van Santen, E, Wehtje, GR, Kelton, AJ (2015) Herbicide and rye cover crop residue integration affect weed control and yield in strip-tillage peanut. Peanut Sci 42:30–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, JP, Putnam, AR (1987) Role of benzoxazinones in allelopathy by rye (Secale cereale L.). J Chem Ecol 13:889–906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, IC, Troxler, SC, Wilcut, JW, Smith, WD (2008) Purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) response to postemergence herbicides in cotton. Weed Technol 22:615–621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushuk, W, ed (1976) Rye: Production, Chemistry, and Technology. St. Paul, MN: American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc. p 22 Google Scholar
[CAST] Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (2012) Herbicide-Resistant Weeds Threaten Soil Conservation Gains: Finding a Balance for Soil and Farm Sustainability. Issue Paper 49. Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620–626 Google Scholar
Evans, JA, Tranel, PJ, Hager, AG, Schutte, B, Wu, C, Chatham, LA, Davis, AS (2015) Managing the evolution of herbicide resistance. Pest Manag Sci 72:74–80 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everman, WJ, Burke, IC, Allen, JR, Collins, J, Wilcut, JW (2007) Weed control and yield with glufosinate-resistant cotton weed management systems. Weed Technol 21:695–701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, JA, Bradley, KW, Young, BG, Steckel, LE, Johnson, WG, Norsworthy, JK, Davis, VM, Loux, MM (2017) Influence of tillage method on management of Amaranthus species in soybean. Weed Technol 31:10–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flitcroft, I (2015) Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network. Griffin, GA: University of Georgia. http://www.georgiaweather.net. Accessed: October 1, 2018Google Scholar
Gallagher, RS, Cardina, J (1998a) Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination I: effect of seed burial and germination temperature. Weed Sci 46:48–52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, RS, Cardina, J (1998b) Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination II: development of very low fluence sensitivity. Weed Sci 46:53–58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasnam (1985) Plant and yield responses to skips in upland cotton. Indones J Crop Sci 1:29–42 Google Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199–204 Google Scholar
Knight, IA, Rains, GC, Culbreath, AK, Toews, MD (2017) Thrips counts and disease incidence in response to reflective particle films and conservation tillage in cotton and peanut cropping systems. Entomol Exp Appl 162:19–29 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornecki, TS (2016) The effects of combined cover crop termination and planting in a cotton no-till system. Appl Eng Agric 32:551–560 Google Scholar
Kornecki, TS, Raper, RL, Arriaga, FJ, Schwab, EB, Bergtold, JS (2009) Impact of rye rolling direction and different no-till row cleaners on cotton emergence and yield. T ASABE 52:383–391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menalled, FD, Peterson, RKD, Smith, RG, Curran, WS, Paez, DJ, Maxwell, BD (2016) The eco-evolutionary imperative: revisiting weed management in the midst of an herbicide resistance crisis. Sustainability 8:1297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsky, SB, Ryan, MR, Curran, WS, Teasdale, JR, Maul, J, Spargo, JT, Moyer, J, Grantham, AM, Weber, D, Way, TR, Camargo, GG (2012) Conservation tillage issues: cover crop-based organic rotational no-till grain production in the mid-Atlantic region, USA. Renew Agr Food Syst 27:31–40 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Duzy, LM, Kelton, JA (2012) Herbicide and cover crop residue integration for Amaranthus control in conservation agriculture cotton and implications for resistance management. Weed Technol 26:490–498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, AJ, Monks, CD, Culpepper, AS, Duzy, LM, Kelton, JA, Marshall, MW, Steckel, LE, Sosnoskie, LM, Nichols, RL (2016) High-residue cover crops alone or with strategic tillage to manage glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in southeastern cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J Soil Water Conserv 71:1–11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, DW, Price, AJ, Patterson, MG (2005) Evaluation of three winter cereals for weed control in conservation-tillage nontransgenic cotton. Weed Technol 19:731–736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, B (2015) Herbicide-resistance in weeds and crops: interaction and impact on farming sustainability. Page 29 in Proc 25th Asian-Pacific Weed Sci Soc Conf. Hyderabad, India: Indian Society of Weed ScienceGoogle Scholar
Sanders, CH, Joseph, DD, Marshall, MW (2017) Efficacy of selected herbicide programs in 2,4-D tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agric Sci 8:1157–1167 Google Scholar
Shergill, LS, Bish, MD, Jugulam, M, Bradley, KW (2018) Molecular and physiological characterization of six-way resistance in an Amaranthus tuberculatus var.rudis biotype from Missouri. Pest Manag Sci 74:2688–2698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR (1996) Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agriculture systems. J Prod Agric 9:431–479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Mohler, CL (1993) Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron J 85:673–680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tehranchian, P, Nandula, V, Jugulam, M, Putta, K, Jasieniuk, M (2018) Multiple resistance to glyphosate, paraquat and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in Italian ryegrass populations from California: confirmation and mechanisms of resistance. Pest Manag Sci 74:868–877 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:12–27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Simmons, DB, Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Bridges, DC, Scully, BT (2016) Factors affecting potential for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) suppression by winter rye in Georgia, USA. Field Crop Res 192:103–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, JH, Charudattan, R, Duke, SO, Fennimore, SA, Marrone, P, Slaughter, DC, Swanton, C, Zollinger, R (2018) Weed management in 2050: perspectives on the future of weed science. Weed Sci 66:275–285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, J, Culpepper, AS, Freeman, M, Harris, G, Kemerait, B, Perry, C, Porter, W, Roberts, P, Shurley, D, Smith, A (2017) 2017 Georgia Cotton Production Guide. Publication No. CSS-17-01 Tifton, GA: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 9–140 Google Scholar
Wiggins, MS, Hayes, RM, Steckel, LE (2016) Evaluating cover crops and herbicides for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in cotton. Weed Technol 30:415–422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, MS, McClure, MA, Hayes, RM, Steckel, LE (2015) Integrating cover crops and POST herbicides for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in corn. Weed Technol 29:412–418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, PW, Vigil, MF (1998) Cover crop effects on soil water relationships. J Soil Water Conserv 53:200–207 Google Scholar
Yu, Q, Powles, S (2014) Metabolism-based herbicide resistance and cross-resistance in crop weeds: a threat to herbicide sustainability and global crop production. Plant Phys 166:1106–1118 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed