Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:47:26.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cattle Foraging Behavior in Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula)-Infested Rangeland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rodney G. Lym  and
Donald R. Kirby
Rodney G. Lym
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron, N.D. State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Donald R. Kirby
Affiliation:
Dep. Anim. Range Sci., N.D. State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leafy spurge causes economic loss by reducing both herbage production and use. Herbage use by grazing cattle in various densities of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L. #3 EPHES) was evaluated over a 3-yr period in North Dakota. Forage production and disappearance were estimated in four density classes of leafy spurge. Use of cool- and warm-season graminoids, forbs, and leafy spurge was estimated during the middle and the end of each grazing season. Cattle used 20 and 2% of the herbage in the zero and low density infestations, respectively, by mid-season. Moderate and high density infestations were avoided until the milky latex in leafy spurge disappeared in early fall, and herbage availability in zero and low density infestations declined. Herbage use in moderate and high density infestations increased to an average of 46% by the end of the grazing season compared to 61% in zero and low density infestations. An annual herbage loss of at least 35% occurred in pasture infested with 50% density or more of leafy spurge.

Keywords

Cattleherbage useeconomic lossEPHES
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , October 1987 , pp. 314 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alley, H. P., Humburg, N. E., Fornstrom, J. K., and Ferrell, M. 1984. Leafy spurge repetitive herbicide treatments. Res. Weed Sci. Wyo. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. J. 192:90–93.Google Scholar
2. Allison, C. D. 1985. Factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants: A review. J. Range Manage. 38:305–311.Google Scholar
3. Best, K. F., Bowes, G. G., Thomas, A. G., and Maw, M. G. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 39. Euphorbia esula L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dunn, P. H. 1979. The distribution of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) and other weedy Euphorbia spp. in the United States. Weed Sci. 27:509–516.Google Scholar
5. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Univ. Kans. Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
6. Johnston, A., and Peake, R. W. 1960. Effect of selective grazing by sheep on the control of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.). J. Range Manage. 13:192–195.Google Scholar
7. Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Landgraf, B. K., Fay, P. K., and Havstad, K. M. 1984. Utilization of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) by sheep. Weed Sci. 32: 348–352.Google Scholar
9. Lym, R. G., and Messersmith, C. G. 1983. Control of leafy spurge with herbicides. N. D. Farm Res. 40(5): 16–19, 26.Google Scholar
10. Lym, R. G., and Messersmith, C. G. 1985. Leafy spurge control and improved forage production with herbicides. J. Range Manage. 38:386–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lym, R. G., and Messersmith, C. G. 1987. Leafy spurge control with resulting forage production from several herbicide treatments. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci., p. 19–20.Google Scholar
12. Messersmith, C. G. 1983. The leafy spurge plant. N. D. Farm Res. 40(5):3–7.Google Scholar
13. Messersmith, C. G., and Lym, R. G. 1983. Distribution and economic impacts of leafy spurge in North Dakota. N. D. Farm Res. 40(5):8–13.Google Scholar
14. Nielsen, D. B. 1978. The economic impact of poisonous plants on the range livestock industry in the 17 western states. J. Range Manage. 31:325–328.Google Scholar
15. Reilly, W., and Kaufman, K. R. 1979. The social and economic impact of leafy spurge in Montana. Pages 21–24 in Proceedings: Leafy spurge symposium. N. D. State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv., unnumbered publication.Google Scholar
16. Selleck, G. W., Coupland, R. T., and Frankton, C. 1962. Leafy spurge in Saskatchewan. Ecol. Monogr. 32:1–29.Google Scholar
17. Soil Conservation Service. 1984. Range Site Technical Guide Notice ND–35. Bismarck, ND.Google Scholar
18. Statistical Analysis System Institute. 1982. SAS Users' Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
19. Vavra, M., Rice, R. W., and Bement, R. E. 1973. Chemical composition of the diet, intake, and gain of yearling cattle on different grazing intensities. J. Anim. Sci. 36:411–414.Google Scholar