Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:27:48.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus) Response to Herbicides and Burning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Twain J. Butler ,
Jim F. Stritzke ,
Larry A. Redmon  and
Carla L. Goad
Twain J. Butler*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University Research & Extension Center, 1229 N. HW 281 Stephenville, TX 76401
Jim F. Stritzke
Affiliation:
277 Agriculture Hall, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Larry A. Redmon
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Research & Extension Center, 1710 N. HW 3053, P.O. Box 200, Overton, TX 75684
Carla L. Goad
Affiliation:
301 Mathematic Sciences, Department of Statistics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Broomsedge control studies were conducted on six broomsedge-infested pastures in southeastern Oklahoma from 1995 to 1997. Glyphosate applied in spring at 2.24 kg ai/ha decreased broomsedge plant density by 58% 3 mo after treatment (MAT), on areas where the previous year's forage was grazed, and by 95% 3 MAT, where spring fire had removed the old top-growth before glyphosate application. Broomsedge plant density was not affected where glyphosate was applied in spring to sites with old-standing top-growth. Paraquat applied in spring at 0.56 kg ai/ha and spring burning without a herbicide treatment had no effect on broomsedge plant density. Glyphosate at 0.56 and 1.12 kg ai/ha applied in late summer reduced the number of broomsedge stems 1 yr after treatment (YAT) by an average of 65 and 80%, respectively. Paraquat at 0.56 kg/ha applied in late summer of 1995, followed by burning 1 wk after treatment (WAT), decreased broomsedge stem density by more than 60% 1 YAT at four of six locations when compared with mowing in late summer. Burning in November after an October frost decreased broomsedge stem density by more than 47% 1 YAT at four locations. Two consecutive years of burning after frost and paraquat applied in late summer followed by burning 1 WAT reduced broomsedge dry matter production by 68 and 96%, respectively, when compared with mowing in late summer. These data suggest that good to excellent control of established broomsedge is possible with herbicides alone, with a combination of herbicides and late-summer burning, and with fall burning after an early frost in a dry fall. However, broomsedge control was short-lived with all the treatments because of the establishment of new broomsedge seedlings. Thus, it will be important to integrate the destruction of broomsedge plants with proper fertility and grazing management in order to provide satisfactory broomsedge control.

Keywords

Glyphosateparaquatbroomsedge, Andropogon virginicus L. #3 ANOVICYNDA, Cynodon dactylon, mowing, prescribed fireDM, dry matterMAT, months after treatmentWAT, weeks after treatmentYAT, years after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 18 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Albert, W. B. 1965. Control of little barley in coastal bermudagrass with atrazine and paraquat. Weeds 13: 375–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, D. M., Stritzke, J. F., Bidwell, T. G., and Claypool, P. L. 1993. Late-summer fire and follow-up herbicide treatments in tallgrass prairie. J. Range Manag. 46: 542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. L. and Engle, D. M. 1988. Effects of late summer fire on tallgrass prairie microclimate and community composition. Am. Midl. Nat. 120 (1): 212–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. and Ware, G. O. 1978. Dates of glyphosate treatment on weeds and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 26: 523–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. J. and Lowance, S. A. 1974. Fertility and management treatments to control broomsedge in pastures. Weed Sci. 22 (3): 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurman, C. W. 1969. Broomsedge as influenced by differential preparations, defoliations, and fertilization practices. Ph.D. dissertation. Mississippi State University, State College, Mississippi. Diss. Abstr. 69-19809.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems. 1996. Version 6.11. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Steel, R. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vaught, H. C., Witt, W. W., and Herron, J. W. 1977. Broomsedge control with glyphosate. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:59.Google Scholar