Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:16:51.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bromoxynil-Resistant Common Groundsel (Senecio vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Carol Mallory-Smith
Carol Mallory-Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Resistance to bromoxynil and terbacil was confirmed in common groundsel collected from peppermint (Mentha piperita) fields in Oregon. This is the first reported case of a bromoxynil-resistant weed selected under field conditions. The bromoxynil rate required to reduce growth by 50% was 10 times higher for the resistant biotype than for the susceptible biotype. The bromoxynil-resistant biotype also was resistant to terbacil.

Keywords

Bromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrileterbacil, 5-chloro-3-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-methyl-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedionecommon groundsel, Senecio vulgaris L. #3 SENVUHerbicide resistancepeppermintSENVUGR50, herbicide rate that reduced growth 50%R, resistantS, susceptible
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 322 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Fuller, T. C. and McClintock, E. 1986. Poisonous Plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. pp. 94–96.Google Scholar
Gronwald, J. W. 1994. Resistance to photosystem II inhibiting herbicides. In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. pp. 27–60.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 1997. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:96.Google Scholar
Jepson, R. and Mason, R. G. 1996. Survey of Pesticide Applications on Oregon Mint Fields. Special Rep. 958. Corvallis, OR: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University. 42 p.Google Scholar
LeBaron, H. M. 1991. Distribution and seriousness of herbicide-resistant weed infestations worldwide. In Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614–616.Google Scholar
Sardar, F. M. and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1997. Survey of terbacil resistant common lambsquarters and pigweed. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 50:34.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT® User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed., Volume 2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 846 p.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–225.Google Scholar
Trebst, A. and Draber, W. 1979. Structure activity correlations of recent herbicides in photosynthetic reactions. In Geissbuhler, H., Brooks, G. T., and Kearney, P. C., eds. Advances in Pesticide Science. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press. pp. 223–234.Google Scholar