Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-16T01:50:50.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broadleaf Weed Control in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) with Sulfonylurea Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Randy L. Anderson
Randy L. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Akron, CO 80720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L. ‘Hartman’) in the rosette growth stage or early bolting stage tolerated thiameturon {3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] amino] sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acid} at 5, 10, and 15 g ai/ha. Safflower also tolerated chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} at 18 g/ha if safflower was taller than 15 cm at time of application. The fresh weight of above-ground biomass of common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. #3 HELAN), treated at two plant sizes with thiameturon, was reduced more than 88%. Soil activity of thiameturon also reduced the seedling vigor of common sunflower, but thiameturon in soil was not as lethal to common sunflower as were foliar applications.

Keywords

Helianthus annuusSolanum triflorumchlorsulfuronmetsulfuronthiameturoncanopy closureHELANSOLTR.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 1987 , pp. 242 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. L. 1985. Chlorsulfuron for weed control in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Weed Sci. 33:840–842.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1983. Herbicides for chemical fallow in northeastern Colorado. Colorado State Univ. Exp. Stn. Bull. 586S. p. 1–4.Google Scholar
3. Good, L. G., and Smika, D. E. 1978. Chemical fallow for soil and water conservation in the Great Plains. J. Soil Water Conserv. 33:89–91.Google Scholar
4. Greb, B. W., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Ecofallow comes of age in the Central Great Plains. J. Soil Water Conserv. 35:230–233.Google Scholar
5. Leavitt, G. 1983. Sulfonylureas: new high potency herbicides. Pages 243–250 in Miyamoto, J. et al., eds. IUPAC Pesticide Chemistry. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
6. Martin, J. H., Leonard, W. H., and Stamp, D. L. 1976. Safflower. Pages 977–980 in Principles of Field Crop Production. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
7. Mukhopadhyay, S. K., and Ghosh, D. C. 1981. Weeds and their control in oil seed crops. Pesticides 15:6–11.Google Scholar
8. Nelson, E. W., and Burnside, O. 1975. Common sunflower. Page 220 in Nebraska Weeds. Nebraska Dep. Agric., Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
9. Viste, K. L., Crovetti, A. J., and Horrom, B. W. 1970. Dimethylpropynylbenzamides: A new group of herbicides. Science 167:280–281.Google Scholar
10. Zimmerman, L. H. 1973. Effect of photoperiod and temperature on rosette habit in safflower. Crop Sci. 13:80–81.Google Scholar